加拿大和非洲联盟:实现共同议程

Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1080/00083968.2023.2252532
Rita Abrahamsen, Barbra Chimhandamba
{"title":"加拿大和非洲联盟:实现共同议程","authors":"Rita Abrahamsen, Barbra Chimhandamba","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2023.2252532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, global powers are not only scrambling for Africa’s abundant resources but also jostling for its political attention. In the midst of this new geopolitical environment of heightened tension, Canada is developing its first ever engagement framework for Africa. In light of this, we argue that the African Union (AU) should be central to Canada’s engagement strategy. Canada’s ability to engage bilaterally with fifty-four countries is inevitably limited. At the same time, the AU is increasingly speaking with a stronger, more unified voice on the international stage, seeking to position Africa as an influential global partner. Many of the AU’s founding principles and guiding norms support a rules-based multilateral order, and Canada and the organisation can find common ground in seeking not only to strengthen but also possibly improve and reform what is commonly known as the rules-based liberal international order.RÉSUMÉÀ la suite de l’invasion de l’Ukraine par la Russie, les puissances mondiales se bousculent non seulement pour exploiter les ressources abondantes de l’Afrique, mais aussi pour attirer son attention politique. Dans ce nouvel environnement géopolitique marqué par l’accroissement des tensions, le Canada élabore son tout premier cadre d’engagement en Afrique. À la lumière de cette situation, nous soutenons que l’Union africaine (UA) doit être au cœur de la stratégie d’engagement du Canada. La capacité du Canada à s’engager bilatéralement avec 54 pays est inévitablement limitée. Dans le même temps, l’UA s’exprime de plus en plus d’une voix plus forte et plus unie sur la scène internationale, cherchant à positionner l’Afrique comme un partenaire mondial influent. Beaucoup des principes fondateurs et normes directrices de l’UA soutiennent un ordre multilatéral fondé sur des règles, et le Canada et l’organisation peuvent trouver un terrain d’entente en cherchant non seulement à renforcer, mais aussi à éventuellement améliorer et réformer ce que l’on appelle communément l’ordre international libéral fondé sur des règles.KEYWORDS: CanadaAfricaAfrican Unioninternational cooperationdiplomacyMOTS-CLÉS: CanadaAfriqueUnion africainecoopération internationalediplomatie AcknowledgementsWe gratefully acknowledge the research assistance provided by Dr Farai Chipato and Ms Bucky Badejo.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 This commentary draws on the report Canada and the African Union: Towards a Shared Agenda, published by the Centre for International Policy Studies (CIPS) in February 2023. In preparation of the report, we benefitted from the insights and comments of numerous individuals in the African Union, Global Affairs Canada, diplomatic representatives to the AU, and academic experts in Africa, Canada and beyond.2 The AU does, of course, sometimes fail to live up to its principles, and the same can be said for Canada.Additional informationFundingThe research for this article was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), grant number 611-2021-0196, and by the Alex Trebek Forum for Dialogue’s support for the project Changing Orders: Shaping the Future and Securing Rights in a World in Transformation.Notes on contributorsRita AbrahamsenRita Abrahamsen is a professor in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. She has published widely on African politics, security and international relations.Barbra ChimhandambaBarbra Chimhandamba holds a PhD in political science from Carleton University, with specialisation in comparative politics and international relations. She was an Alex Trebek Fellow at the Centre for International Policy Studies at the University of Ottawa from February 2022 to April 2023 with the project “Changing Orders: Shaping the Future and Security Rights in a World in Transformation.” She previously worked as a foreign service officer and has extensive experience in bilateral and multilateral diplomacy.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canada and the African Union: towards a shared agenda\",\"authors\":\"Rita Abrahamsen, Barbra Chimhandamba\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00083968.2023.2252532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTIn the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, global powers are not only scrambling for Africa’s abundant resources but also jostling for its political attention. In the midst of this new geopolitical environment of heightened tension, Canada is developing its first ever engagement framework for Africa. In light of this, we argue that the African Union (AU) should be central to Canada’s engagement strategy. Canada’s ability to engage bilaterally with fifty-four countries is inevitably limited. At the same time, the AU is increasingly speaking with a stronger, more unified voice on the international stage, seeking to position Africa as an influential global partner. Many of the AU’s founding principles and guiding norms support a rules-based multilateral order, and Canada and the organisation can find common ground in seeking not only to strengthen but also possibly improve and reform what is commonly known as the rules-based liberal international order.RÉSUMÉÀ la suite de l’invasion de l’Ukraine par la Russie, les puissances mondiales se bousculent non seulement pour exploiter les ressources abondantes de l’Afrique, mais aussi pour attirer son attention politique. Dans ce nouvel environnement géopolitique marqué par l’accroissement des tensions, le Canada élabore son tout premier cadre d’engagement en Afrique. À la lumière de cette situation, nous soutenons que l’Union africaine (UA) doit être au cœur de la stratégie d’engagement du Canada. La capacité du Canada à s’engager bilatéralement avec 54 pays est inévitablement limitée. Dans le même temps, l’UA s’exprime de plus en plus d’une voix plus forte et plus unie sur la scène internationale, cherchant à positionner l’Afrique comme un partenaire mondial influent. Beaucoup des principes fondateurs et normes directrices de l’UA soutiennent un ordre multilatéral fondé sur des règles, et le Canada et l’organisation peuvent trouver un terrain d’entente en cherchant non seulement à renforcer, mais aussi à éventuellement améliorer et réformer ce que l’on appelle communément l’ordre international libéral fondé sur des règles.KEYWORDS: CanadaAfricaAfrican Unioninternational cooperationdiplomacyMOTS-CLÉS: CanadaAfriqueUnion africainecoopération internationalediplomatie AcknowledgementsWe gratefully acknowledge the research assistance provided by Dr Farai Chipato and Ms Bucky Badejo.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 This commentary draws on the report Canada and the African Union: Towards a Shared Agenda, published by the Centre for International Policy Studies (CIPS) in February 2023. In preparation of the report, we benefitted from the insights and comments of numerous individuals in the African Union, Global Affairs Canada, diplomatic representatives to the AU, and academic experts in Africa, Canada and beyond.2 The AU does, of course, sometimes fail to live up to its principles, and the same can be said for Canada.Additional informationFundingThe research for this article was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), grant number 611-2021-0196, and by the Alex Trebek Forum for Dialogue’s support for the project Changing Orders: Shaping the Future and Securing Rights in a World in Transformation.Notes on contributorsRita AbrahamsenRita Abrahamsen is a professor in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. She has published widely on African politics, security and international relations.Barbra ChimhandambaBarbra Chimhandamba holds a PhD in political science from Carleton University, with specialisation in comparative politics and international relations. She was an Alex Trebek Fellow at the Centre for International Policy Studies at the University of Ottawa from February 2022 to April 2023 with the project “Changing Orders: Shaping the Future and Security Rights in a World in Transformation.” She previously worked as a foreign service officer and has extensive experience in bilateral and multilateral diplomacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2023.2252532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2023.2252532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰之后,全球大国不仅在争夺非洲丰富的资源,还在争夺非洲的政治关注。在这种紧张局势加剧的新地缘政治环境中,加拿大正在制定其有史以来第一个与非洲接触的框架。鉴于此,我们认为非洲联盟(AU)应该是加拿大接触战略的核心。加拿大与54个国家进行双边接触的能力必然是有限的。与此同时,非盟在国际舞台上的声音越来越大,越来越统一,寻求将非洲定位为一个有影响力的全球伙伴。非盟的许多基本原则和指导准则都支持以规则为基础的多边秩序,加拿大和非盟可以找到共同点,不仅寻求加强,而且可能改善和改革通常被称为以规则为基础的自由国际秩序。RÉSUMÉÀ乌克兰入侵事件与俄罗斯有关,资源丰富的非洲事件与资源丰富的非洲事件与资源丰富的非洲事件与资源丰富的非洲事件与资源丰富的非洲事件与资源丰富的非洲事件与资源丰富的非洲事件与资源丰富的非洲事件与资源丰富的非洲事件有关。随着新环境的出现,加拿大与非洲的交往日益紧张,加拿大与非洲的交往日益密切。À关于非洲联盟与非洲联盟(非盟)的关系的报告être au cœur关于加拿大接触战略的报告。加拿大职业技术协会(La capacit du Canada)的雇员双边薪金薪金和薪金薪金是有限的。我们的合作伙伴是même temps、我们的合作伙伴、我们的合作伙伴、我们的合作伙伴、我们的合作伙伴、我们的合作伙伴、我们的合作伙伴、我们的全球影响力。《联合国关于建立和规范的原则公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范的原则公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范的原则公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范国际关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范国际关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范国际关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范国际关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范国际关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范国际关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范国际关于建立和规范的公约》、《联合国关于建立和规范国际关于建立和规范的公约》。关键词:加拿大非洲非洲联盟国际cooperationdiplomacyMOTS-CLÉS:加拿大非洲联盟非洲经济与社会组织国际外交感谢我们感谢Farai Chipato博士和Bucky Badejo女士提供的研究协助。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1本评论摘自国际政策研究中心(CIPS)于2023年2月发表的报告《加拿大和非洲联盟:迈向共同议程》。在编写报告的过程中,我们听取了非洲联盟、加拿大全球事务部、驻非盟外交代表以及非洲、加拿大和其他地区的学术专家的见解和评论当然,非盟有时也会违背自己的原则,加拿大也是如此。本文的研究得到了加拿大社会科学与人文研究理事会(SSHRC)的资助,资助号为611-2021-0196,并得到了亚历克斯·特雷贝克对话论坛对“改变秩序:在转型的世界中塑造未来和保障权利”项目的支持。作者简介丽塔·亚伯拉罕森丽塔·亚伯拉罕森是渥太华大学公共与国际事务研究生院的教授。她在非洲政治、安全和国际关系方面发表了大量文章。巴巴拉·钦汉丹巴,卡尔顿大学政治学博士,主修比较政治学和国际关系。2022年2月至2023年4月,她在渥太华大学国际政策研究中心担任亚历克斯·特雷贝克研究员,研究项目为“变化的秩序:塑造转型世界中的未来和安全权利”。她曾担任外交官员,在双边和多边外交方面拥有丰富的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Canada and the African Union: towards a shared agenda
ABSTRACTIn the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, global powers are not only scrambling for Africa’s abundant resources but also jostling for its political attention. In the midst of this new geopolitical environment of heightened tension, Canada is developing its first ever engagement framework for Africa. In light of this, we argue that the African Union (AU) should be central to Canada’s engagement strategy. Canada’s ability to engage bilaterally with fifty-four countries is inevitably limited. At the same time, the AU is increasingly speaking with a stronger, more unified voice on the international stage, seeking to position Africa as an influential global partner. Many of the AU’s founding principles and guiding norms support a rules-based multilateral order, and Canada and the organisation can find common ground in seeking not only to strengthen but also possibly improve and reform what is commonly known as the rules-based liberal international order.RÉSUMÉÀ la suite de l’invasion de l’Ukraine par la Russie, les puissances mondiales se bousculent non seulement pour exploiter les ressources abondantes de l’Afrique, mais aussi pour attirer son attention politique. Dans ce nouvel environnement géopolitique marqué par l’accroissement des tensions, le Canada élabore son tout premier cadre d’engagement en Afrique. À la lumière de cette situation, nous soutenons que l’Union africaine (UA) doit être au cœur de la stratégie d’engagement du Canada. La capacité du Canada à s’engager bilatéralement avec 54 pays est inévitablement limitée. Dans le même temps, l’UA s’exprime de plus en plus d’une voix plus forte et plus unie sur la scène internationale, cherchant à positionner l’Afrique comme un partenaire mondial influent. Beaucoup des principes fondateurs et normes directrices de l’UA soutiennent un ordre multilatéral fondé sur des règles, et le Canada et l’organisation peuvent trouver un terrain d’entente en cherchant non seulement à renforcer, mais aussi à éventuellement améliorer et réformer ce que l’on appelle communément l’ordre international libéral fondé sur des règles.KEYWORDS: CanadaAfricaAfrican Unioninternational cooperationdiplomacyMOTS-CLÉS: CanadaAfriqueUnion africainecoopération internationalediplomatie AcknowledgementsWe gratefully acknowledge the research assistance provided by Dr Farai Chipato and Ms Bucky Badejo.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 This commentary draws on the report Canada and the African Union: Towards a Shared Agenda, published by the Centre for International Policy Studies (CIPS) in February 2023. In preparation of the report, we benefitted from the insights and comments of numerous individuals in the African Union, Global Affairs Canada, diplomatic representatives to the AU, and academic experts in Africa, Canada and beyond.2 The AU does, of course, sometimes fail to live up to its principles, and the same can be said for Canada.Additional informationFundingThe research for this article was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), grant number 611-2021-0196, and by the Alex Trebek Forum for Dialogue’s support for the project Changing Orders: Shaping the Future and Securing Rights in a World in Transformation.Notes on contributorsRita AbrahamsenRita Abrahamsen is a professor in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. She has published widely on African politics, security and international relations.Barbra ChimhandambaBarbra Chimhandamba holds a PhD in political science from Carleton University, with specialisation in comparative politics and international relations. She was an Alex Trebek Fellow at the Centre for International Policy Studies at the University of Ottawa from February 2022 to April 2023 with the project “Changing Orders: Shaping the Future and Security Rights in a World in Transformation.” She previously worked as a foreign service officer and has extensive experience in bilateral and multilateral diplomacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1