对个别罚款的没收效应

ISVALDO LOPES DE SALES
{"title":"对个别罚款的没收效应","authors":"ISVALDO LOPES DE SALES","doi":"10.35265/2236-6717-238-12792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Limitations on the power to tax are fundamental guarantees for taxpayers, and among them is the principle of prohibition of confiscation, with explicit constitutional provision. The prohibition of confiscation also encompasses tax fines and must pay special attention to their quantification regarding isolated fines for non-compliance with ancillary obligations that do not imply a detriment to the collection or determination of the amount of taxes due. Through doctrinal bibliographical research, analysis of current legislation, and decisions of higher courts, this study seeks, through the deductive method, to determine how the incidence of the prohibition of confiscation principle occurs in isolated fines, with special attention to the calculation basis. This analysis will demonstrate that disproportionality in the amount of pecuniary sanction and the confiscatory effect occurs in isolated fines when widely expanded calculation bases are used, such as the transaction value or the amount of the tax, proposing that fixed values of fines be used for such sanctions, which do not imply losses to tax collection, scaled in progressive ranges, which may be based on the transaction value, tax due, or company revenue. The study also shows that decisions of higher courts have been contrary to the position advocated here, but since the topic is currently under new analysis in the highest court, it is hoped and awaited that the understanding of this court will evolve to adopt a stance in favor of protecting the fundamental rights of taxpayers, especially proportionality and the prohibition of confiscation.","PeriodicalId":21289,"journal":{"name":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFEITO CONFISCATÓRIO EM MULTAS ISOLADAS\",\"authors\":\"ISVALDO LOPES DE SALES\",\"doi\":\"10.35265/2236-6717-238-12792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Limitations on the power to tax are fundamental guarantees for taxpayers, and among them is the principle of prohibition of confiscation, with explicit constitutional provision. The prohibition of confiscation also encompasses tax fines and must pay special attention to their quantification regarding isolated fines for non-compliance with ancillary obligations that do not imply a detriment to the collection or determination of the amount of taxes due. Through doctrinal bibliographical research, analysis of current legislation, and decisions of higher courts, this study seeks, through the deductive method, to determine how the incidence of the prohibition of confiscation principle occurs in isolated fines, with special attention to the calculation basis. This analysis will demonstrate that disproportionality in the amount of pecuniary sanction and the confiscatory effect occurs in isolated fines when widely expanded calculation bases are used, such as the transaction value or the amount of the tax, proposing that fixed values of fines be used for such sanctions, which do not imply losses to tax collection, scaled in progressive ranges, which may be based on the transaction value, tax due, or company revenue. The study also shows that decisions of higher courts have been contrary to the position advocated here, but since the topic is currently under new analysis in the highest court, it is hoped and awaited that the understanding of this court will evolve to adopt a stance in favor of protecting the fundamental rights of taxpayers, especially proportionality and the prohibition of confiscation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-238-12792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-238-12792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对征税权的限制是对纳税人的基本保障,其中包括禁止没收的原则,并有明确的宪法规定。禁止没收也包括罚款,必须特别注意对不遵守附属义务的单独罚款的量化,这些罚款并不意味着损害征收或确定应缴税款。通过理论文献研究、现行立法分析和高等法院的判决,本研究试图通过演绎法确定禁止没收原则在孤立罚款中是如何发生的,并特别注意计算依据。这一分析将表明,当使用广泛扩展的计算基础时,例如交易价值或税收数额,在孤立的罚款中会出现不成比例的经济制裁金额和没收效果,建议将固定的罚款值用于此类制裁,这并不意味着税收损失,在累进范围内按比例缩放,这可能基于交易价值、应缴税款或公司收入。这项研究还表明,高等法院的决定与这里所主张的立场相反,但由于这个问题目前正在最高法院进行新的分析,希望并等待着最高法院的理解将演变为采取有利于保护纳税人基本权利的立场,特别是相称性和禁止没收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EFEITO CONFISCATÓRIO EM MULTAS ISOLADAS
Limitations on the power to tax are fundamental guarantees for taxpayers, and among them is the principle of prohibition of confiscation, with explicit constitutional provision. The prohibition of confiscation also encompasses tax fines and must pay special attention to their quantification regarding isolated fines for non-compliance with ancillary obligations that do not imply a detriment to the collection or determination of the amount of taxes due. Through doctrinal bibliographical research, analysis of current legislation, and decisions of higher courts, this study seeks, through the deductive method, to determine how the incidence of the prohibition of confiscation principle occurs in isolated fines, with special attention to the calculation basis. This analysis will demonstrate that disproportionality in the amount of pecuniary sanction and the confiscatory effect occurs in isolated fines when widely expanded calculation bases are used, such as the transaction value or the amount of the tax, proposing that fixed values of fines be used for such sanctions, which do not imply losses to tax collection, scaled in progressive ranges, which may be based on the transaction value, tax due, or company revenue. The study also shows that decisions of higher courts have been contrary to the position advocated here, but since the topic is currently under new analysis in the highest court, it is hoped and awaited that the understanding of this court will evolve to adopt a stance in favor of protecting the fundamental rights of taxpayers, especially proportionality and the prohibition of confiscation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
QUALIDADE DA ENERGIA ELÉTRICA EM UMA MICRORREDE TRIFÁSICA ISOLADA FORMADA POR INVERSORES BIDIRECIONAIS AGREGANDO GERAÇÃO FOTOVOLTAICA DISTRIBUÍDA ESTRATÉGIAS E DESAFIOS NA GESTÃO DE PESSOAS NO SERVIÇO PÚBLICO FEDERAL UMA REVISÃO BIBLIOGRÁFICA SEGURANÇA CIBERNÉTICA - ESTUDO DAS TÉCNICAS DE ATAQUES CIBERNÉTICOS (PHISHING, RANSMWARE, DDOS) DE ENGENHARIA SOCIAL E MEDIDAS DE PREVENÇÃO FATORES DE RISCO PARA SÍNDROME METABÓLICA EM ADULTOS NO BRASIL PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE FORTALECIMENTO DOS CONSELHOS ESCOLARES: A POLÍTICA DE FORMAÇÃO PARA CONSELHEIROS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1