用网络数据包络分析来评估可持续供应链的绩效

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jer.2023.10.003
Masoud Vaseei , Maryam Daneshmand-Mehr , Morteza Bazrafshan , Armin Ghane Kanafi
{"title":"用网络数据包络分析来评估可持续供应链的绩效","authors":"Masoud Vaseei ,&nbsp;Maryam Daneshmand-Mehr ,&nbsp;Morteza Bazrafshan ,&nbsp;Armin Ghane Kanafi","doi":"10.1016/j.jer.2023.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric method to calculate the efficiency of decision-making units (DMU) under evaluation that perform the same activity. The frontier obtained by this method is a relative frontier accessible in the real world. Due to the uncertainty of the population distribution, the accuracy of the achieved efficiency is questioned. Therefore, this research aims to present a network data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the performance of a sustainable supply chain using bootstrap simulation. In this research, using the two-step approach of data envelopment analysis and the bootstrap method, the information collected from 25 tomato paste companies for the year 2021 has been analyzed. To illustrate the proposed method, a real case study is considered in the Iranian tomato paste supply chain network. The findings showed that using definitive data, 16 companies are efficient and 9 companies are inefficient, and using bootstrap simulation data, 4 companies are efficient and 21 companies are inefficient. Using the proposed framework, the overall efficiency value has been calculated in two cases using DEA and the bootstrap model. In addition, the efficiency of the stage is calculated separately. Based on the calculated results, if a DMU is considered efficient, its efficiency score is equal to 1 in each of the stages. Otherwise, the cause of the inefficiency of each DMU is identified. Also, based on the comparisons made between the proposed model and the basic models based on sensitivity analysis, the accuracy of the proposed bootstrap-based model in introducing the number of efficient units has been better than the basic models. Therefore, the accuracy of the used method can be concluded.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research","volume":"12 4","pages":"Pages 904-915"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A network data envelopment analysis to evaluate the performance of a sustainable supply chain using bootstrap simulation\",\"authors\":\"Masoud Vaseei ,&nbsp;Maryam Daneshmand-Mehr ,&nbsp;Morteza Bazrafshan ,&nbsp;Armin Ghane Kanafi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jer.2023.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric method to calculate the efficiency of decision-making units (DMU) under evaluation that perform the same activity. The frontier obtained by this method is a relative frontier accessible in the real world. Due to the uncertainty of the population distribution, the accuracy of the achieved efficiency is questioned. Therefore, this research aims to present a network data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the performance of a sustainable supply chain using bootstrap simulation. In this research, using the two-step approach of data envelopment analysis and the bootstrap method, the information collected from 25 tomato paste companies for the year 2021 has been analyzed. To illustrate the proposed method, a real case study is considered in the Iranian tomato paste supply chain network. The findings showed that using definitive data, 16 companies are efficient and 9 companies are inefficient, and using bootstrap simulation data, 4 companies are efficient and 21 companies are inefficient. Using the proposed framework, the overall efficiency value has been calculated in two cases using DEA and the bootstrap model. In addition, the efficiency of the stage is calculated separately. Based on the calculated results, if a DMU is considered efficient, its efficiency score is equal to 1 in each of the stages. Otherwise, the cause of the inefficiency of each DMU is identified. Also, based on the comparisons made between the proposed model and the basic models based on sensitivity analysis, the accuracy of the proposed bootstrap-based model in introducing the number of efficient units has been better than the basic models. Therefore, the accuracy of the used method can be concluded.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Research\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 904-915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723002638\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723002638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据包络分析(DEA)是一种计算被评价决策单元(DMU)执行相同活动的效率的非参数方法。该方法得到的边界是现实世界中可达的相对边界。由于人口分布的不确定性,使得所得效率的准确性受到质疑。因此,本研究旨在提出一个网络数据包络分析模型,利用bootstrap模拟来评估可持续供应链的绩效。本研究采用数据包络分析的两步方法和自举法,对25家番茄酱公司收集的2021年信息进行了分析。为了说明所提出的方法,以伊朗番茄酱供应链网络为例进行了实际案例研究。研究结果表明,使用确定性数据,16家公司是高效的,9家公司是低效的;使用bootstrap模拟数据,4家公司是高效的,21家公司是低效的。在此框架下,利用DEA和bootstrap模型计算了两种情况下的总效率值。此外,还单独计算了该阶段的效率。根据计算结果,如果认为某个DMU是高效的,则其在每个阶段的效率得分为1。否则,将识别每个DMU效率低下的原因。通过与基于灵敏度分析的基本模型的比较,发现基于自举的模型在引入有效机组数方面的准确性优于基本模型。由此可以得出所采用方法的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A network data envelopment analysis to evaluate the performance of a sustainable supply chain using bootstrap simulation
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric method to calculate the efficiency of decision-making units (DMU) under evaluation that perform the same activity. The frontier obtained by this method is a relative frontier accessible in the real world. Due to the uncertainty of the population distribution, the accuracy of the achieved efficiency is questioned. Therefore, this research aims to present a network data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the performance of a sustainable supply chain using bootstrap simulation. In this research, using the two-step approach of data envelopment analysis and the bootstrap method, the information collected from 25 tomato paste companies for the year 2021 has been analyzed. To illustrate the proposed method, a real case study is considered in the Iranian tomato paste supply chain network. The findings showed that using definitive data, 16 companies are efficient and 9 companies are inefficient, and using bootstrap simulation data, 4 companies are efficient and 21 companies are inefficient. Using the proposed framework, the overall efficiency value has been calculated in two cases using DEA and the bootstrap model. In addition, the efficiency of the stage is calculated separately. Based on the calculated results, if a DMU is considered efficient, its efficiency score is equal to 1 in each of the stages. Otherwise, the cause of the inefficiency of each DMU is identified. Also, based on the comparisons made between the proposed model and the basic models based on sensitivity analysis, the accuracy of the proposed bootstrap-based model in introducing the number of efficient units has been better than the basic models. Therefore, the accuracy of the used method can be concluded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Research
Journal of Engineering Research ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering Research (JER) is a international, peer reviewed journal which publishes full length original research papers, reviews, case studies related to all areas of Engineering such as: Civil, Mechanical, Industrial, Electrical, Computer, Chemical, Petroleum, Aerospace, Architectural, Biomedical, Coastal, Environmental, Marine & Ocean, Metallurgical & Materials, software, Surveying, Systems and Manufacturing Engineering. In particular, JER focuses on innovative approaches and methods that contribute to solving the environmental and manufacturing problems, which exist primarily in the Arabian Gulf region and the Middle East countries. Kuwait University used to publish the Journal "Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering" (ISSN: 1024-8684), which included Science and Engineering articles since 1974. In 2011 the decision was taken to split KJSE into two independent Journals - "Journal of Engineering Research "(JER) and "Kuwait Journal of Science" (KJS).
期刊最新文献
Investigation of optimal feature for milling chatter identification using supervised machine learning techniques Prediction of tensile strength of biochar filled polylactic acid composites via box-behnken design Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube (SWCNT) thin films via automatic spray coating and nitric acid vapor treatment Experimental studies on performance and emission measures of a 4-stroke compression ignition engine using palm bio-diesel blended with N-butanol Performance evaluation of turbulent circular heat exchanger with a novel flow deflector-type baffle plate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1