Cole Jetton, Matthew I. Campbell, Christopher Hoyle
{"title":"考虑用户反馈的贝叶斯优化中可行设计空间的约束","authors":"Cole Jetton, Matthew I. Campbell, Christopher Hoyle","doi":"10.1115/1.4063906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper develops a method to integrate user knowledge into the optimization process by simultaneously modelling feasible design space and optimizing an objective function. In engineering, feasible design space is a constraint similar to those in optimization problems. However, not all constraints can be explicitly written as mathematical functions. This includes manufacturing concerns, ergonomic issues, complex geometric considerations, or exploring material options for a particular application. There needs to be a way to integrate designer knowledge into the design process and, preferably, use that to guide an optimization problem. In this research, these constraints are modeled using classification surrogate models and incorporated with Bayesian optimization. By suggesting design options to a user and allowing them to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, the method models both the feasible design space and an objective function probability of new design targets that are more optimal and have a high probability of being feasible. This proposed method is first proven with test optimization problems to show viability then is extended to include user feedback. This paper shows that by allowing users to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, it can effectively guide the optimization process to a feasible solution.","PeriodicalId":50137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Design","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constraining the Feasible Design Space in Bayesian Optimization with User Feedback\",\"authors\":\"Cole Jetton, Matthew I. Campbell, Christopher Hoyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper develops a method to integrate user knowledge into the optimization process by simultaneously modelling feasible design space and optimizing an objective function. In engineering, feasible design space is a constraint similar to those in optimization problems. However, not all constraints can be explicitly written as mathematical functions. This includes manufacturing concerns, ergonomic issues, complex geometric considerations, or exploring material options for a particular application. There needs to be a way to integrate designer knowledge into the design process and, preferably, use that to guide an optimization problem. In this research, these constraints are modeled using classification surrogate models and incorporated with Bayesian optimization. By suggesting design options to a user and allowing them to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, the method models both the feasible design space and an objective function probability of new design targets that are more optimal and have a high probability of being feasible. This proposed method is first proven with test optimization problems to show viability then is extended to include user feedback. This paper shows that by allowing users to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, it can effectively guide the optimization process to a feasible solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063906\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constraining the Feasible Design Space in Bayesian Optimization with User Feedback
Abstract This paper develops a method to integrate user knowledge into the optimization process by simultaneously modelling feasible design space and optimizing an objective function. In engineering, feasible design space is a constraint similar to those in optimization problems. However, not all constraints can be explicitly written as mathematical functions. This includes manufacturing concerns, ergonomic issues, complex geometric considerations, or exploring material options for a particular application. There needs to be a way to integrate designer knowledge into the design process and, preferably, use that to guide an optimization problem. In this research, these constraints are modeled using classification surrogate models and incorporated with Bayesian optimization. By suggesting design options to a user and allowing them to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, the method models both the feasible design space and an objective function probability of new design targets that are more optimal and have a high probability of being feasible. This proposed method is first proven with test optimization problems to show viability then is extended to include user feedback. This paper shows that by allowing users to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, it can effectively guide the optimization process to a feasible solution.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.
Scope: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.