考虑用户反馈的贝叶斯优化中可行设计空间的约束

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Mechanical Design Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1115/1.4063906
Cole Jetton, Matthew I. Campbell, Christopher Hoyle
{"title":"考虑用户反馈的贝叶斯优化中可行设计空间的约束","authors":"Cole Jetton, Matthew I. Campbell, Christopher Hoyle","doi":"10.1115/1.4063906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper develops a method to integrate user knowledge into the optimization process by simultaneously modelling feasible design space and optimizing an objective function. In engineering, feasible design space is a constraint similar to those in optimization problems. However, not all constraints can be explicitly written as mathematical functions. This includes manufacturing concerns, ergonomic issues, complex geometric considerations, or exploring material options for a particular application. There needs to be a way to integrate designer knowledge into the design process and, preferably, use that to guide an optimization problem. In this research, these constraints are modeled using classification surrogate models and incorporated with Bayesian optimization. By suggesting design options to a user and allowing them to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, the method models both the feasible design space and an objective function probability of new design targets that are more optimal and have a high probability of being feasible. This proposed method is first proven with test optimization problems to show viability then is extended to include user feedback. This paper shows that by allowing users to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, it can effectively guide the optimization process to a feasible solution.","PeriodicalId":50137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Design","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constraining the Feasible Design Space in Bayesian Optimization with User Feedback\",\"authors\":\"Cole Jetton, Matthew I. Campbell, Christopher Hoyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper develops a method to integrate user knowledge into the optimization process by simultaneously modelling feasible design space and optimizing an objective function. In engineering, feasible design space is a constraint similar to those in optimization problems. However, not all constraints can be explicitly written as mathematical functions. This includes manufacturing concerns, ergonomic issues, complex geometric considerations, or exploring material options for a particular application. There needs to be a way to integrate designer knowledge into the design process and, preferably, use that to guide an optimization problem. In this research, these constraints are modeled using classification surrogate models and incorporated with Bayesian optimization. By suggesting design options to a user and allowing them to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, the method models both the feasible design space and an objective function probability of new design targets that are more optimal and have a high probability of being feasible. This proposed method is first proven with test optimization problems to show viability then is extended to include user feedback. This paper shows that by allowing users to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, it can effectively guide the optimization process to a feasible solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063906\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文提出了一种将可行设计空间建模和目标函数优化同时进行的方法,将用户知识整合到优化过程中。在工程中,可行设计空间是一个类似于优化问题的约束。然而,并不是所有的约束都可以显式地写成数学函数。这包括制造问题,人体工程学问题,复杂的几何考虑,或探索特定应用的材料选择。需要有一种方法将设计师的知识整合到设计过程中,最好是用它来指导优化问题。在本研究中,使用分类代理模型对这些约束进行建模,并结合贝叶斯优化。通过向用户建议设计选项,并允许他们将可行和不可行的设计区域框起来,该方法既建立了可行设计空间的模型,也建立了新设计目标的目标函数概率的模型,这些目标是更优的,具有较高的可行性。首先用测试优化问题证明了该方法的可行性,然后扩展到包括用户反馈。本文表明,通过允许用户将可行和不可行的设计区域框起来,可以有效地引导优化过程得到可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constraining the Feasible Design Space in Bayesian Optimization with User Feedback
Abstract This paper develops a method to integrate user knowledge into the optimization process by simultaneously modelling feasible design space and optimizing an objective function. In engineering, feasible design space is a constraint similar to those in optimization problems. However, not all constraints can be explicitly written as mathematical functions. This includes manufacturing concerns, ergonomic issues, complex geometric considerations, or exploring material options for a particular application. There needs to be a way to integrate designer knowledge into the design process and, preferably, use that to guide an optimization problem. In this research, these constraints are modeled using classification surrogate models and incorporated with Bayesian optimization. By suggesting design options to a user and allowing them to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, the method models both the feasible design space and an objective function probability of new design targets that are more optimal and have a high probability of being feasible. This proposed method is first proven with test optimization problems to show viability then is extended to include user feedback. This paper shows that by allowing users to box off areas of feasible and infeasible designs, it can effectively guide the optimization process to a feasible solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mechanical Design
Journal of Mechanical Design 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials. Scope: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.
期刊最新文献
Joint Special Issue on Advances in Design and Manufacturing for Sustainability Optimization of Tooth Profile Modification Amount and Manufacturing Tolerance Allocation for RV Reducer under Reliability Constraint Critical thinking assessment in engineering education: A Scopus-based literature review Accounting for Machine Learning Prediction Errors in Design Thinking Beyond the Default User: The Impact of Gender, Stereotypes, and Modality on Interpretation of User Needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1