技术意识与隐私侵权的未来

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.60082/2817-5069.3925
Emily Laidlaw
{"title":"技术意识与隐私侵权的未来","authors":"Emily Laidlaw","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates how to develop the tort of privacy to better address technology-facilitated abuse. The central question explored is how explicitly the role and function of technology should be engaged in a legal test. The article argues that technology is constitutive of our society, shaping our social and cultural institutions, which in turn shape the development of technology and together define the everyday ways that our privacy is enjoyed and invaded. A privacy tort should therefore directly engage with the social significance of technology—what this article frames as technology mindfulness. To develop the concept of technology mindfulness, and with the goal of law reform, the article is structured in three parts. In the first part, the current privacy torts are critically analyzed to identify their lack of suitability to address evolving technologies and abuse. In the second part, the article grapples with how to examine technology in a tort, wrestling with the tension between the value of technology neutrality in law making and the need for a technology-mindful lens. In this part, the features of a technology-mindful law are outlined. In the final part, a new tort is sketched, drawing from constitutional principles. The goal is to illustrate how to embed technology mindfulness and overcome some of the weaknesses of current law.","PeriodicalId":45757,"journal":{"name":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","volume":"25 02","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology Mindfulness and the Future of the Tort of Privacy\",\"authors\":\"Emily Laidlaw\",\"doi\":\"10.60082/2817-5069.3925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article investigates how to develop the tort of privacy to better address technology-facilitated abuse. The central question explored is how explicitly the role and function of technology should be engaged in a legal test. The article argues that technology is constitutive of our society, shaping our social and cultural institutions, which in turn shape the development of technology and together define the everyday ways that our privacy is enjoyed and invaded. A privacy tort should therefore directly engage with the social significance of technology—what this article frames as technology mindfulness. To develop the concept of technology mindfulness, and with the goal of law reform, the article is structured in three parts. In the first part, the current privacy torts are critically analyzed to identify their lack of suitability to address evolving technologies and abuse. In the second part, the article grapples with how to examine technology in a tort, wrestling with the tension between the value of technology neutrality in law making and the need for a technology-mindful lens. In this part, the features of a technology-mindful law are outlined. In the final part, a new tort is sketched, drawing from constitutional principles. The goal is to illustrate how to embed technology mindfulness and overcome some of the weaknesses of current law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"25 02\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了如何发展隐私侵权以更好地解决技术促进的滥用问题。所探讨的中心问题是,技术的作用和功能应该如何明确地参与法律测试。这篇文章认为,技术是我们社会的组成部分,塑造了我们的社会和文化机构,而社会和文化机构反过来又塑造了技术的发展,并共同定义了我们的隐私被享受和侵犯的日常方式。因此,隐私侵权应直接涉及技术的社会意义——本文将其定义为技术意识。为了发展技术正念的概念,并以法律改革为目标,本文分为三个部分。在第一部分中,对当前的隐私侵权行为进行批判性分析,以确定其缺乏应对不断发展的技术和滥用的适用性。在第二部分中,本文探讨了如何在侵权行为中审视技术,解决了法律制定中技术中立的价值与对技术关注视角的需求之间的紧张关系。在这一部分中,概述了技术意识法的特征。最后,从宪法原则出发,概述了一种新的侵权行为。目标是说明如何嵌入技术意识并克服现行法律的一些弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technology Mindfulness and the Future of the Tort of Privacy
This article investigates how to develop the tort of privacy to better address technology-facilitated abuse. The central question explored is how explicitly the role and function of technology should be engaged in a legal test. The article argues that technology is constitutive of our society, shaping our social and cultural institutions, which in turn shape the development of technology and together define the everyday ways that our privacy is enjoyed and invaded. A privacy tort should therefore directly engage with the social significance of technology—what this article frames as technology mindfulness. To develop the concept of technology mindfulness, and with the goal of law reform, the article is structured in three parts. In the first part, the current privacy torts are critically analyzed to identify their lack of suitability to address evolving technologies and abuse. In the second part, the article grapples with how to examine technology in a tort, wrestling with the tension between the value of technology neutrality in law making and the need for a technology-mindful lens. In this part, the features of a technology-mindful law are outlined. In the final part, a new tort is sketched, drawing from constitutional principles. The goal is to illustrate how to embed technology mindfulness and overcome some of the weaknesses of current law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Provincial Constitutions, the Amending Formula, and Unilateral Amendments to the Constitution of Canada: An Analysis of Quebec’s Bill 96 Peace and Good Order: The Case for Indigenous Justice in Canada by Harold R. Johnson The Elusive Motive Requirement in Canada’s Terrorism Offences: Defining and Distinguishing Ideology, Religion, and Politics Policing in the Shadow of Legality: Pretext, Leveraging, and Investigation Cascades No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress by Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1