文学研究中作者理论的发展:过去与现在

G.S. Kambarova, B.D. Zhumakayeva, A.T. Tolysbaeva
{"title":"文学研究中作者理论的发展:过去与现在","authors":"G.S. Kambarova, B.D. Zhumakayeva, A.T. Tolysbaeva","doi":"10.47526/2023-3/2664-0686.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the article is a comprehensive analysis of the problem of the historical development of the concept of «author» in literary studies as a multifaceted category of personality. Attention is drawn to the direction of development of the author's theory in literature in the periods of Romanticism, structuralism, formalism, poststructuralism and postmodernism, a comparative, expert analysis of the fundamental theoretical conclusions and basic principles of authoritative representatives of this period is carried out. In «neorealism», which brought a new impetus to literary criticism, over the same period of time in the USA, Europe, Russia and our country, the author's theory developed and interpreted in different ways. The logical connection of these theories with each other was weak and even had contradictions in some issues. In addition, the analysis reveals that the American-English «new criticism», the European-French «criticism of consciousness» and the Soviet classical paradigms have their own characteristics and differences. The consistency of А. Baitursynov's conclusions in relation to the author with the studies of other scientists in the world literature was analyzed. Modern trends in the development of the author's theory were also identified and an expert analysis of the works of scientists in this field was carried out. As the main components that make up the concept of «Author», the categories are defined – «the image of the author», «the position of the author», «the intention of the author», innovative ideas in this direction are analyzed. The authors of the article, relying on the historical pattern in the development and decline of scientific theories and literary schools, formulate that at present there is a «period of theoretical crisis» in science related to the author's theory.","PeriodicalId":476423,"journal":{"name":"A. Âsaui atyndaġy Halyķaralyķ ķazaķ-tùrìk universitetìnìṇ habaršysy","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Author Theory in Literary Studies: Past and Present\",\"authors\":\"G.S. Kambarova, B.D. Zhumakayeva, A.T. Tolysbaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.47526/2023-3/2664-0686.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relevance of the article is a comprehensive analysis of the problem of the historical development of the concept of «author» in literary studies as a multifaceted category of personality. Attention is drawn to the direction of development of the author's theory in literature in the periods of Romanticism, structuralism, formalism, poststructuralism and postmodernism, a comparative, expert analysis of the fundamental theoretical conclusions and basic principles of authoritative representatives of this period is carried out. In «neorealism», which brought a new impetus to literary criticism, over the same period of time in the USA, Europe, Russia and our country, the author's theory developed and interpreted in different ways. The logical connection of these theories with each other was weak and even had contradictions in some issues. In addition, the analysis reveals that the American-English «new criticism», the European-French «criticism of consciousness» and the Soviet classical paradigms have their own characteristics and differences. The consistency of А. Baitursynov's conclusions in relation to the author with the studies of other scientists in the world literature was analyzed. Modern trends in the development of the author's theory were also identified and an expert analysis of the works of scientists in this field was carried out. As the main components that make up the concept of «Author», the categories are defined – «the image of the author», «the position of the author», «the intention of the author», innovative ideas in this direction are analyzed. The authors of the article, relying on the historical pattern in the development and decline of scientific theories and literary schools, formulate that at present there is a «period of theoretical crisis» in science related to the author's theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":476423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A. Âsaui atyndaġy Halyķaralyķ ķazaķ-tùrìk universitetìnìṇ habaršysy\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A. Âsaui atyndaġy Halyķaralyķ ķazaķ-tùrìk universitetìnìṇ habaršysy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-3/2664-0686.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A. Âsaui atyndaġy Halyķaralyķ ķazaķ-tùrìk universitetìnìṇ habaršysy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-3/2664-0686.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的相关性在于对文学研究中“作者”概念作为一个多面人格范畴的历史发展问题进行全面分析。关注作者的文学理论在浪漫主义、结构主义、形式主义、后结构主义和后现代主义时期的发展方向,对这一时期权威代表的基本理论结论和基本原则进行比较、专业的分析。在为文学批评带来新动力的“新现实主义”中,作者的理论在美国、欧洲、俄罗斯和我国的同一时期得到了不同的发展和解释。这些理论之间的逻辑联系较弱,甚至在某些问题上存在矛盾。此外,分析还表明,美英“新批评”、欧法“意识批评”和苏联经典范式各有特点和差异。А的一致性。拜图尔斯诺夫的结论与作者与世界文献中其他科学家的研究有关。本文还确定了作者理论发展的现代趋势,并对该领域科学家的著作进行了专家分析。作为构成“作者”概念的主要组成部分,界定了“作者形象”、“作者地位”、“作者意图”等范畴,并分析了这一方向的创新思路。本文作者根据科学理论和文学流派兴衰的历史格局,提出了当前与作者理论相关的科学正处于一个“理论危机时期”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of Author Theory in Literary Studies: Past and Present
The relevance of the article is a comprehensive analysis of the problem of the historical development of the concept of «author» in literary studies as a multifaceted category of personality. Attention is drawn to the direction of development of the author's theory in literature in the periods of Romanticism, structuralism, formalism, poststructuralism and postmodernism, a comparative, expert analysis of the fundamental theoretical conclusions and basic principles of authoritative representatives of this period is carried out. In «neorealism», which brought a new impetus to literary criticism, over the same period of time in the USA, Europe, Russia and our country, the author's theory developed and interpreted in different ways. The logical connection of these theories with each other was weak and even had contradictions in some issues. In addition, the analysis reveals that the American-English «new criticism», the European-French «criticism of consciousness» and the Soviet classical paradigms have their own characteristics and differences. The consistency of А. Baitursynov's conclusions in relation to the author with the studies of other scientists in the world literature was analyzed. Modern trends in the development of the author's theory were also identified and an expert analysis of the works of scientists in this field was carried out. As the main components that make up the concept of «Author», the categories are defined – «the image of the author», «the position of the author», «the intention of the author», innovative ideas in this direction are analyzed. The authors of the article, relying on the historical pattern in the development and decline of scientific theories and literary schools, formulate that at present there is a «period of theoretical crisis» in science related to the author's theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Readiness of Future Special Teachers to Improve Professional Activities The Formation of Professionally-based Competence of Future Foreign Language Teachers through Using Digital Technologies Features of Preparing Future Mathematics Teachers for the Implementation of Logical Tasks Effectiveness of Using Elements of Mathematical Analysis in Solving Non-Standard Problems Steam Education is a Model for the Formation of Professional Competencies for Future Technicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1