{"title":"组合:用机器学习探索艺术创作的美学与技术维度","authors":"Artemi-Maria Gioti, Aaron Einbond, Georgina Born","doi":"10.1162/comj_a_00658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article we address the role of machine learning (ML) in the composition of two new musical works for acoustic instruments and electronics through autoethnographic reflection on the experience. Our study poses the key question of how ML shapes, and is in turn shaped by, the aesthetic commitments characterizing distinctive compositional practices. Further, we ask how artistic research in these practices can be informed by critical themes from humanities scholarship on material engagement and critical data studies. Through these frameworks, we consider in what ways the interaction with ML algorithms as part of the compositional process differs from that with other music technology tools. Rather than focus on narrowly conceived ML algorithms, we take into account the heterogeneous assemblage brought into play: from composers, performers, and listeners to loudspeakers, microphones, and audio descriptors. Our analysis focuses on a deconstructive critique of data as being contingent on the decisions and material conditions involved in the data creation process. It also explores how interaction among the human and nonhuman collaborators in the ML assemblage has significant similarities to—as well as differences from—existing models of material engagement. Tracking the creative process of composing these works, we uncover the aesthetic implications of the many nonlinear collaborative decisions involved in composing the assemblage.","PeriodicalId":50639,"journal":{"name":"Computer Music Journal","volume":"57 24","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Composing the Assemblage: Probing Aesthetic and Technical Dimensions of Artistic Creation with Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Artemi-Maria Gioti, Aaron Einbond, Georgina Born\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/comj_a_00658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article we address the role of machine learning (ML) in the composition of two new musical works for acoustic instruments and electronics through autoethnographic reflection on the experience. Our study poses the key question of how ML shapes, and is in turn shaped by, the aesthetic commitments characterizing distinctive compositional practices. Further, we ask how artistic research in these practices can be informed by critical themes from humanities scholarship on material engagement and critical data studies. Through these frameworks, we consider in what ways the interaction with ML algorithms as part of the compositional process differs from that with other music technology tools. Rather than focus on narrowly conceived ML algorithms, we take into account the heterogeneous assemblage brought into play: from composers, performers, and listeners to loudspeakers, microphones, and audio descriptors. Our analysis focuses on a deconstructive critique of data as being contingent on the decisions and material conditions involved in the data creation process. It also explores how interaction among the human and nonhuman collaborators in the ML assemblage has significant similarities to—as well as differences from—existing models of material engagement. Tracking the creative process of composing these works, we uncover the aesthetic implications of the many nonlinear collaborative decisions involved in composing the assemblage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Music Journal\",\"volume\":\"57 24\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Music Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/comj_a_00658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Music Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/comj_a_00658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Composing the Assemblage: Probing Aesthetic and Technical Dimensions of Artistic Creation with Machine Learning
Abstract In this article we address the role of machine learning (ML) in the composition of two new musical works for acoustic instruments and electronics through autoethnographic reflection on the experience. Our study poses the key question of how ML shapes, and is in turn shaped by, the aesthetic commitments characterizing distinctive compositional practices. Further, we ask how artistic research in these practices can be informed by critical themes from humanities scholarship on material engagement and critical data studies. Through these frameworks, we consider in what ways the interaction with ML algorithms as part of the compositional process differs from that with other music technology tools. Rather than focus on narrowly conceived ML algorithms, we take into account the heterogeneous assemblage brought into play: from composers, performers, and listeners to loudspeakers, microphones, and audio descriptors. Our analysis focuses on a deconstructive critique of data as being contingent on the decisions and material conditions involved in the data creation process. It also explores how interaction among the human and nonhuman collaborators in the ML assemblage has significant similarities to—as well as differences from—existing models of material engagement. Tracking the creative process of composing these works, we uncover the aesthetic implications of the many nonlinear collaborative decisions involved in composing the assemblage.
期刊介绍:
Computer Music Journal is published quarterly with an annual sound and video anthology containing curated music¹. For four decades, it has been the leading publication about computer music, concentrating fully on digital sound technology and all musical applications of computers. This makes it an essential resource for musicians, composers, scientists, engineers, computer enthusiasts, and anyone exploring the wonders of computer-generated sound.
Edited by experts in the field and featuring an international advisory board of eminent computer musicians, issues typically include:
In-depth articles on cutting-edge research and developments in technology, methods, and aesthetics of computer music
Reports on products of interest, such as new audio and MIDI software and hardware
Interviews with leading composers of computer music
Announcements of and reports on conferences and courses in the United States and abroad
Publication, event, and recording reviews
Tutorials, letters, and editorials
Numerous graphics, photographs, scores, algorithms, and other illustrations.