在辩论之外:非洲的非殖民化、非殖民化和重新规划发展

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politikon Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1080/02589346.2023.2280388
Edlyne E. Anugwom
{"title":"在辩论之外:非洲的非殖民化、非殖民化和重新规划发展","authors":"Edlyne E. Anugwom","doi":"10.1080/02589346.2023.2280388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe paper argues that the current quest for decolonisation and decoloniality struggles are primarily embodiments of disenchantment with the development doldrums in the continent after decades of political independence. While both decolonisation and decoloniality sound like intellectual pursuits concerned with knowledge production, they are in essence efforts towards recasting and rebooting development in the continent. Despite ingrained differences both decolonisation and decoloniality, aspire towards unmasking the futility and incompleteness of Euro-American epistemological traditions and worldviews. Despite differences in the usage of concepts, both decolonisation and decoloniality reframe the notion of ‘delinking’ made popular by Samir Amin. In effect, Amin may rightly be conceived as a precursor of the decolonisation struggle. Apart from agitating for a pluriversality of epistemic traditions and ‘ways of knowing’, both decolonisation and decoloniality seek to reposition Africa in global relations of power and politics and from the above engender sustainable development. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Given the vastness of his writings and expansive but articulate span of his ideas I am only going to systematically excerpt those aspects of his writings with direct bearing on the theme of this paper and the discussion pursued thus far. In other words, this is neither a comprehensive rehash nor a thorough-going evaluation or critique of Amin. I would leave such chores to those who are better equipped for them.","PeriodicalId":45047,"journal":{"name":"Politikon","volume":"123 21","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the debate: decolonisation, decoloniality and the reframing of development in Africa\",\"authors\":\"Edlyne E. Anugwom\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589346.2023.2280388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe paper argues that the current quest for decolonisation and decoloniality struggles are primarily embodiments of disenchantment with the development doldrums in the continent after decades of political independence. While both decolonisation and decoloniality sound like intellectual pursuits concerned with knowledge production, they are in essence efforts towards recasting and rebooting development in the continent. Despite ingrained differences both decolonisation and decoloniality, aspire towards unmasking the futility and incompleteness of Euro-American epistemological traditions and worldviews. Despite differences in the usage of concepts, both decolonisation and decoloniality reframe the notion of ‘delinking’ made popular by Samir Amin. In effect, Amin may rightly be conceived as a precursor of the decolonisation struggle. Apart from agitating for a pluriversality of epistemic traditions and ‘ways of knowing’, both decolonisation and decoloniality seek to reposition Africa in global relations of power and politics and from the above engender sustainable development. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Given the vastness of his writings and expansive but articulate span of his ideas I am only going to systematically excerpt those aspects of his writings with direct bearing on the theme of this paper and the discussion pursued thus far. In other words, this is neither a comprehensive rehash nor a thorough-going evaluation or critique of Amin. I would leave such chores to those who are better equipped for them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politikon\",\"volume\":\"123 21\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politikon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2023.2280388\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politikon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2023.2280388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文认为,当前对非殖民化和非殖民化斗争的追求主要体现了对几十年政治独立后非洲大陆发展低迷的觉醒。虽然非殖民化和非殖民化听起来像是与知识生产有关的智力追求,但它们实质上是为重塑和重新启动非洲大陆的发展而作出的努力。尽管非殖民化和非殖民化之间存在着根深蒂固的差异,但我们仍致力于揭露欧美认识论传统和世界观的无用和不完整。尽管概念的使用有所不同,但非殖民化和非殖民化都重新定义了萨米尔·阿明(Samir Amin)流行的“脱钩”概念。实际上,阿明可能被正确地视为非殖民化斗争的先驱。除了鼓动认识传统和“认识方式”的多元性之外,非殖民化和非殖民化都寻求在全球权力和政治关系中重新定位非洲,并由此产生可持续发展。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1鉴于他著作的广泛性和他思想的广博而清晰的跨度,我只打算系统地摘录他著作中与本文主题和迄今为止所进行的讨论直接相关的那些方面。换句话说,这既不是对阿明的全面重述,也不是彻底的评价或批判。我会把这些琐事留给那些更有能力的人去做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond the debate: decolonisation, decoloniality and the reframing of development in Africa
ABSTRACTThe paper argues that the current quest for decolonisation and decoloniality struggles are primarily embodiments of disenchantment with the development doldrums in the continent after decades of political independence. While both decolonisation and decoloniality sound like intellectual pursuits concerned with knowledge production, they are in essence efforts towards recasting and rebooting development in the continent. Despite ingrained differences both decolonisation and decoloniality, aspire towards unmasking the futility and incompleteness of Euro-American epistemological traditions and worldviews. Despite differences in the usage of concepts, both decolonisation and decoloniality reframe the notion of ‘delinking’ made popular by Samir Amin. In effect, Amin may rightly be conceived as a precursor of the decolonisation struggle. Apart from agitating for a pluriversality of epistemic traditions and ‘ways of knowing’, both decolonisation and decoloniality seek to reposition Africa in global relations of power and politics and from the above engender sustainable development. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Given the vastness of his writings and expansive but articulate span of his ideas I am only going to systematically excerpt those aspects of his writings with direct bearing on the theme of this paper and the discussion pursued thus far. In other words, this is neither a comprehensive rehash nor a thorough-going evaluation or critique of Amin. I would leave such chores to those who are better equipped for them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politikon
Politikon POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Politikon focuses primarily on South African politics, but not exclusively so. Over the years the journal has published articles by some of the world" leading political scientists, including Arend Lijphart, Samuel Huntingdon, and Philippe Schmitter. It has also featured important contributions from South Africa"s leading political philosophers, political scientists and international relations experts. It has proved an influential journal, particularly in debates over the merits of South Africa"s constitutional reforms (in 1983 and 1994). In the last few years special issues have focused on women and politics in South Africa, and the South African election of 1999.
期刊最新文献
Combatants in African conflicts, professionals, praetorians, militias, insurgents and mercenaries Combatants in African conflicts, professionals, praetorians, militias, insurgents and mercenaries , by, Simon David Taylor, London, Routledge, May 2022, 248pp., £130.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781351065467 Amin’s progressive internationalism EU sanctions on Zimbabwe: rethinking Africa’s economic and political security in the global age Beyond the debate: decolonisation, decoloniality and the reframing of development in Africa Between Samir Amin and Claude Ake: towards a roadmap for Africa’s development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1