利用鼠标追踪和自我报告研究双语和性别在心理理论中的作用

IF 1.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS International Journal of Bilingualism Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1177/13670069231208120
Rowena J. Xia, Brian W. Haas
{"title":"利用鼠标追踪和自我报告研究双语和性别在心理理论中的作用","authors":"Rowena J. Xia, Brian W. Haas","doi":"10.1177/13670069231208120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and Objectives: Although there exists empirical support for the idea that bilingualism is associated with improved social cognition, the presence and the structure of this link remains inconclusive. There is currently a need to clarify the specific contexts in which these benefits may tend to emerge. Methodology: We sought to advance the field of bilingualism by examining the link between bilingualism and a specific form of social cognition, theory of mind. We measured theory of mind processing in a sample of adult bilinguals and monolinguals and measured patterns of decision-making using several different methods; task performance (accuracy and reaction time), implicit decision-making patterns (mouse-tracking), and self-report. We collected mouse-tracking data during two different tasks (false belief and cognitive–affective theory of mind) and self-report was measured using the perspective-taking (PT) subscale of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Data and Analysis: For each behavioral task, we compared reaction time, accuracy, and both mouse-tracking metrics between language groups. For self-report, we compared PT scores between language groups. We also tested for interactive effects of gender and language group on each dependent variable. Findings: Across all participants, bilingualism was not associated with any statistically significant improvements in theory of mind. However, we did observe that gender interacted with language group to affect maximal deviation values (mouse-tracking) during the false belief task and self-reported PT scores. Bilingualism tended to confer some improvements in self-reported theory of mind (PT subscale of IRI) in men, but not women. Originality: It is currently unknown if bilingualism is associated with improved theory of mind processing when measured using several different types of tasks and using mouse-tracking. Significance/Implications: These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence elucidating the complex relationship that exists between multiple language acquisition and social cognition.","PeriodicalId":47574,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bilingualism","volume":" 947","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the role of bilingualism and gender on theory of mind using mouse-tracking and self-report\",\"authors\":\"Rowena J. Xia, Brian W. Haas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13670069231208120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims and Objectives: Although there exists empirical support for the idea that bilingualism is associated with improved social cognition, the presence and the structure of this link remains inconclusive. There is currently a need to clarify the specific contexts in which these benefits may tend to emerge. Methodology: We sought to advance the field of bilingualism by examining the link between bilingualism and a specific form of social cognition, theory of mind. We measured theory of mind processing in a sample of adult bilinguals and monolinguals and measured patterns of decision-making using several different methods; task performance (accuracy and reaction time), implicit decision-making patterns (mouse-tracking), and self-report. We collected mouse-tracking data during two different tasks (false belief and cognitive–affective theory of mind) and self-report was measured using the perspective-taking (PT) subscale of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Data and Analysis: For each behavioral task, we compared reaction time, accuracy, and both mouse-tracking metrics between language groups. For self-report, we compared PT scores between language groups. We also tested for interactive effects of gender and language group on each dependent variable. Findings: Across all participants, bilingualism was not associated with any statistically significant improvements in theory of mind. However, we did observe that gender interacted with language group to affect maximal deviation values (mouse-tracking) during the false belief task and self-reported PT scores. Bilingualism tended to confer some improvements in self-reported theory of mind (PT subscale of IRI) in men, but not women. Originality: It is currently unknown if bilingualism is associated with improved theory of mind processing when measured using several different types of tasks and using mouse-tracking. Significance/Implications: These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence elucidating the complex relationship that exists between multiple language acquisition and social cognition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bilingualism\",\"volume\":\" 947\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bilingualism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231208120\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231208120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和目标:虽然有经验支持双语与社会认知能力提高有关的观点,但这种联系的存在和结构仍不确定。目前有必要澄清这些好处可能出现的具体情况。方法:我们试图通过研究双语和一种特定形式的社会认知,即心理理论之间的联系来推进双语领域。我们测量了成年双语者和单语者的心智加工理论,并使用几种不同的方法测量了决策模式;任务表现(准确性和反应时间)、隐式决策模式(鼠标跟踪)和自我报告。我们在两个不同的任务(错误信念和认知情感理论)中收集了小鼠跟踪数据,并使用人际反应指数(IRI)的换位思考(PT)子量表对自我报告进行了测量。数据和分析:对于每个行为任务,我们比较了不同语言组的反应时间、准确性和鼠标跟踪指标。对于自我报告,我们比较了语言组之间的PT分数。我们还测试了性别和语言群体对每个因变量的交互影响。研究发现:在所有的参与者中,双语与心智理论的任何统计学上的显著改善没有关联。然而,我们确实观察到性别与语言组的相互作用会影响错误信念任务中的最大偏差值(鼠标跟踪)和自我报告的PT分数。双语倾向于使男性的自我报告心理理论(IRI的PT分量表)有所改善,而女性则没有。原创性:目前尚不清楚,当使用几种不同类型的任务和鼠标跟踪来测量时,双语能力是否与心智处理理论的改进有关。意义/启示:这些发现为阐明多语言习得与社会认知之间存在的复杂关系提供了越来越多的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the role of bilingualism and gender on theory of mind using mouse-tracking and self-report
Aims and Objectives: Although there exists empirical support for the idea that bilingualism is associated with improved social cognition, the presence and the structure of this link remains inconclusive. There is currently a need to clarify the specific contexts in which these benefits may tend to emerge. Methodology: We sought to advance the field of bilingualism by examining the link between bilingualism and a specific form of social cognition, theory of mind. We measured theory of mind processing in a sample of adult bilinguals and monolinguals and measured patterns of decision-making using several different methods; task performance (accuracy and reaction time), implicit decision-making patterns (mouse-tracking), and self-report. We collected mouse-tracking data during two different tasks (false belief and cognitive–affective theory of mind) and self-report was measured using the perspective-taking (PT) subscale of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Data and Analysis: For each behavioral task, we compared reaction time, accuracy, and both mouse-tracking metrics between language groups. For self-report, we compared PT scores between language groups. We also tested for interactive effects of gender and language group on each dependent variable. Findings: Across all participants, bilingualism was not associated with any statistically significant improvements in theory of mind. However, we did observe that gender interacted with language group to affect maximal deviation values (mouse-tracking) during the false belief task and self-reported PT scores. Bilingualism tended to confer some improvements in self-reported theory of mind (PT subscale of IRI) in men, but not women. Originality: It is currently unknown if bilingualism is associated with improved theory of mind processing when measured using several different types of tasks and using mouse-tracking. Significance/Implications: These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence elucidating the complex relationship that exists between multiple language acquisition and social cognition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bilingualism is an international forum for the dissemination of original research on the linguistic, psychological, neurological, and social issues which emerge from language contact. While stressing interdisciplinary links, the focus of the Journal is on the language behavior of the bi- and multilingual individual.
期刊最新文献
Predicting language dominance in Spanish/English bilingual adults based on relative speech-in-speech recognition scores. Limited input and the acquisition of Finnish: The evolution of a child speaker in a multilingual environment Relative clause attachment preferences of late bilinguals Relations among degree of bilingualism and bilateral information processing in children and adults Dual drivers of bilingual semantic accent: Semantic relations and input limitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1