{"title":"让美国变得不伟大","authors":"Chris Magra","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a911207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making America Not Great Chris Magra (bio) Dane A. Morrison, Eastward of Good Hope: Early America in a Dangerous World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021. xv + 314 pp. Notes, sources, and index. $57.00. There has been much recent interest in interactions between the United States and the rest of the world. America's dependence on Chinese manufacturers and shipping companies, red balloons with spy cameras, and TikTok tech have grabbed the attention of politicians, historians, and the wider public. A United States president and multiple state governors have played on popular xenophobic fears and toxic nationalism in a wild effort to make America great again. Historians have engaged with this public interest in America and the world.1 Dael Norwood in Trading Freedom (2022) and Brian Rouleau in With Sails Whitening Every Sea (2014), for example, have demonstrated that overseas trade and foreign entanglements shaped the course of early American political culture. For Norwood, United States commercial ties with China \"put American merchants and sailors into direct contact with a vast array of new peoples and places, and at critical moments it inspired policymakers and politicians to consider national projects and domestic disputes in global perspective\" (p. 10). In this top-down history, overseas commerce turned early American political leaders into cosmopolitans, and they began to associate world trade with freedom, or post-American-Revolution \"liberation from the mercantilist confines of the British Empire\" (p. 20).2 Rouleau tacks a different course. For him, \"every barroom brawl, stabbing, or other violent incident\" involving American mariners in overseas ports in China and throughout the Pacific Ocean, \"jeopardized connections the United States (and its commercial class) had built with foreign governments (and their own merchants).\" (p. 106) Controlling misbehaving maritime laborers became a means of sustaining global capitalism and America's burgeoning overseas empire. In this bottom-up account, early American maritime laborers were not cosmopolitans. Overseas trade did not foster worldly accommodationist attitudes among motley crews. Instead, they used contemporary notions of savage and civilized to describe themselves and the foreign peoples they encountered. Mariners frequently likened Pacific Islanders to negative stereotypes of American Indians. These [End Page 121] attitudes led at times to physical violence. Such \"racialized vigilantism\" even caused colonization in the case of Hawaii (p. 85). Dane Morrison's prize-winning new book, Eastward of Good Hope, further positions the early history of the United States in a global context. Morrison's book leans more toward Rouleau's bottom-up approach. For Morrison, increased interest in world trade meant greater antipathy among American merchants and mariners toward foreign peoples and places during the Early Republic, when U.S. attitudes were in their most formative state. The winner of the John Lyman Book Award stridently argues that \"Americans had imagined the world as disordered and dangerous, deranged by tyranny or steeped in chaos, often deadly, always uncertain, unpredictable, and unstable . . . This vision of the world, more than anything else, shaped Americans' ideas of their place in the world\" (p. viii). Big, bold arguments make for good discussions in graduate seminars. And Morrison sticks to his guns throughout the book. Greater volumes of direct, long-distance trade between the United States and the world did not shape the contours of American culture in positive ways. Maritime commerce did not produce American cosmopolitans, or citizens of the world. Instead, overseas trade stimulated xenophobia in the early United States. The author has marshalled a great deal of evidence to make his case. Morrison focuses on American attitudes toward four regions: the Ottoman Empire; China; India; and the Great South Sea, which includes the East Indies, Oceania, and the Pacific Northwest portion of North America. Scholars young and old will no doubt enjoy debating the extent to which these four regions constitute \"the world\"3 (p. viii). Morrison principally relies on mariners' news reports, ships' logs, journals, captivity and travel narratives, and correspondence between merchants to document the formation of American fears of peoples and places in these four regions. Morrison is as theoretically oriented as he is meticulous in his research methods. He uses Lorgia Garcia-Pena's postcolonial theories on archival silences to unpack the ways in which eighteenth...","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making America Not Great\",\"authors\":\"Chris Magra\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rah.2023.a911207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Making America Not Great Chris Magra (bio) Dane A. Morrison, Eastward of Good Hope: Early America in a Dangerous World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021. xv + 314 pp. Notes, sources, and index. $57.00. There has been much recent interest in interactions between the United States and the rest of the world. America's dependence on Chinese manufacturers and shipping companies, red balloons with spy cameras, and TikTok tech have grabbed the attention of politicians, historians, and the wider public. A United States president and multiple state governors have played on popular xenophobic fears and toxic nationalism in a wild effort to make America great again. Historians have engaged with this public interest in America and the world.1 Dael Norwood in Trading Freedom (2022) and Brian Rouleau in With Sails Whitening Every Sea (2014), for example, have demonstrated that overseas trade and foreign entanglements shaped the course of early American political culture. For Norwood, United States commercial ties with China \\\"put American merchants and sailors into direct contact with a vast array of new peoples and places, and at critical moments it inspired policymakers and politicians to consider national projects and domestic disputes in global perspective\\\" (p. 10). In this top-down history, overseas commerce turned early American political leaders into cosmopolitans, and they began to associate world trade with freedom, or post-American-Revolution \\\"liberation from the mercantilist confines of the British Empire\\\" (p. 20).2 Rouleau tacks a different course. For him, \\\"every barroom brawl, stabbing, or other violent incident\\\" involving American mariners in overseas ports in China and throughout the Pacific Ocean, \\\"jeopardized connections the United States (and its commercial class) had built with foreign governments (and their own merchants).\\\" (p. 106) Controlling misbehaving maritime laborers became a means of sustaining global capitalism and America's burgeoning overseas empire. In this bottom-up account, early American maritime laborers were not cosmopolitans. Overseas trade did not foster worldly accommodationist attitudes among motley crews. Instead, they used contemporary notions of savage and civilized to describe themselves and the foreign peoples they encountered. Mariners frequently likened Pacific Islanders to negative stereotypes of American Indians. These [End Page 121] attitudes led at times to physical violence. Such \\\"racialized vigilantism\\\" even caused colonization in the case of Hawaii (p. 85). Dane Morrison's prize-winning new book, Eastward of Good Hope, further positions the early history of the United States in a global context. Morrison's book leans more toward Rouleau's bottom-up approach. For Morrison, increased interest in world trade meant greater antipathy among American merchants and mariners toward foreign peoples and places during the Early Republic, when U.S. attitudes were in their most formative state. The winner of the John Lyman Book Award stridently argues that \\\"Americans had imagined the world as disordered and dangerous, deranged by tyranny or steeped in chaos, often deadly, always uncertain, unpredictable, and unstable . . . This vision of the world, more than anything else, shaped Americans' ideas of their place in the world\\\" (p. viii). Big, bold arguments make for good discussions in graduate seminars. And Morrison sticks to his guns throughout the book. Greater volumes of direct, long-distance trade between the United States and the world did not shape the contours of American culture in positive ways. Maritime commerce did not produce American cosmopolitans, or citizens of the world. Instead, overseas trade stimulated xenophobia in the early United States. The author has marshalled a great deal of evidence to make his case. Morrison focuses on American attitudes toward four regions: the Ottoman Empire; China; India; and the Great South Sea, which includes the East Indies, Oceania, and the Pacific Northwest portion of North America. Scholars young and old will no doubt enjoy debating the extent to which these four regions constitute \\\"the world\\\"3 (p. viii). Morrison principally relies on mariners' news reports, ships' logs, journals, captivity and travel narratives, and correspondence between merchants to document the formation of American fears of peoples and places in these four regions. Morrison is as theoretically oriented as he is meticulous in his research methods. He uses Lorgia Garcia-Pena's postcolonial theories on archival silences to unpack the ways in which eighteenth...\",\"PeriodicalId\":43597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a911207\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a911207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
克里斯·麦格拉(传记)戴恩·a·莫里森,《美好希望的东方:危险世界中的早期美国》。巴尔的摩:约翰霍普金斯大学出版社,2021。xv + 314页。注释,来源和索引。57.00美元。最近,人们对美国与世界其他地区的互动产生了浓厚的兴趣。美国对中国制造商和航运公司的依赖、带有间谍摄像头的红气球以及TikTok技术已经引起了政治家、历史学家和更广泛公众的注意。一位美国总统和多位州长利用民众的仇外恐惧和有害的民族主义,疯狂地试图让美国再次伟大。历史学家一直致力于研究美国和世界的这种公众利益例如,达尔·诺伍德在《贸易自由》(2022)和布莱恩·鲁罗在《风帆泛白每一片海洋》(2014)中表明,海外贸易和外国纠纷战塑造了早期美国政治文化的进程。对诺伍德来说,美国与中国的商业关系“使美国商人和水手与大量新的民族和地方直接接触,并在关键时刻激励决策者和政治家从全球视角考虑国家项目和国内争端”(第10页)。在这段自上而下的历史中,海外贸易把早期的美国政治领导人变成了世界主义者,他们开始把世界贸易与自由联系起来,或者美国革命后“从大英帝国的重商主义束缚中解放出来”(第20页)鲁罗采取了不同的做法。在他看来,在中国和整个太平洋的海外港口,涉及美国水手的“每一次酒吧斗殴、刺伤或其他暴力事件”,“都破坏了美国(及其商业阶层)与外国政府(及其本国商人)建立的联系”。控制行为不端的海上劳工成为维持全球资本主义和美国迅速发展的海外帝国的一种手段。在这种自下而上的叙述中,早期的美国海上劳工并不是世界主义者。海外贸易并没有在形形色色的船员中培养世俗的迁就主义态度。相反,他们用野蛮和文明的当代概念来描述自己和他们遇到的外国民族。水手们经常把太平洋岛民比作对美洲印第安人的负面刻板印象。这些态度有时会导致身体暴力。这种“种族化的警戒主义”甚至导致了夏威夷的殖民化(第85页)。戴恩·莫里森(Dane Morrison)的获奖新书《好望角的东方》(east of Good Hope)进一步将美国的早期历史置于全球背景下。莫里森的书更倾向于鲁罗自下而上的方法。对莫里森来说,在共和早期,美国人的态度处于最形成的状态,对世界贸易的兴趣增加意味着美国商人和水手对外国人民和地方的更大反感。这位约翰·莱曼图书奖得主尖锐地指出,“美国人想象的世界是无序和危险的,被暴政搞得精神错乱,或者沉浸在混乱之中,往往是致命的,总是不确定的,不可预测的,不稳定的……这种世界观,比其他任何东西都更能塑造美国人对自己在世界上的地位的看法”(第8页)。在研究生研讨会上,宏大而大胆的论点会促成良好的讨论。莫里森在整本书中都坚持自己的观点。美国与世界之间大量的直接、长途贸易并没有以积极的方式塑造美国文化的轮廓。海上贸易并没有产生美国的世界主义者或世界公民。相反,海外贸易刺激了美国早期的仇外情绪。作者整理了大量的证据来证明他的观点。莫里森着重分析了美国人对四个地区的态度:奥斯曼帝国;中国;印度;以及包括东印度群岛、大洋洲和北美太平洋西北部分的大南海。毫无疑问,年轻和年老的学者们会喜欢讨论这四个地区在多大程度上构成了“世界”3(第viii页)。莫里森主要依靠水手的新闻报道、船只的日志、日记、囚禁和旅行的叙述,以及商人之间的通信来记录美国人对这四个地区的人民和地方的恐惧的形成。莫里森在研究方法上既注重理论,又一丝不苟。他利用洛吉亚·加西亚-佩纳关于档案沉默的后殖民理论来揭示十八世纪……
Making America Not Great Chris Magra (bio) Dane A. Morrison, Eastward of Good Hope: Early America in a Dangerous World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021. xv + 314 pp. Notes, sources, and index. $57.00. There has been much recent interest in interactions between the United States and the rest of the world. America's dependence on Chinese manufacturers and shipping companies, red balloons with spy cameras, and TikTok tech have grabbed the attention of politicians, historians, and the wider public. A United States president and multiple state governors have played on popular xenophobic fears and toxic nationalism in a wild effort to make America great again. Historians have engaged with this public interest in America and the world.1 Dael Norwood in Trading Freedom (2022) and Brian Rouleau in With Sails Whitening Every Sea (2014), for example, have demonstrated that overseas trade and foreign entanglements shaped the course of early American political culture. For Norwood, United States commercial ties with China "put American merchants and sailors into direct contact with a vast array of new peoples and places, and at critical moments it inspired policymakers and politicians to consider national projects and domestic disputes in global perspective" (p. 10). In this top-down history, overseas commerce turned early American political leaders into cosmopolitans, and they began to associate world trade with freedom, or post-American-Revolution "liberation from the mercantilist confines of the British Empire" (p. 20).2 Rouleau tacks a different course. For him, "every barroom brawl, stabbing, or other violent incident" involving American mariners in overseas ports in China and throughout the Pacific Ocean, "jeopardized connections the United States (and its commercial class) had built with foreign governments (and their own merchants)." (p. 106) Controlling misbehaving maritime laborers became a means of sustaining global capitalism and America's burgeoning overseas empire. In this bottom-up account, early American maritime laborers were not cosmopolitans. Overseas trade did not foster worldly accommodationist attitudes among motley crews. Instead, they used contemporary notions of savage and civilized to describe themselves and the foreign peoples they encountered. Mariners frequently likened Pacific Islanders to negative stereotypes of American Indians. These [End Page 121] attitudes led at times to physical violence. Such "racialized vigilantism" even caused colonization in the case of Hawaii (p. 85). Dane Morrison's prize-winning new book, Eastward of Good Hope, further positions the early history of the United States in a global context. Morrison's book leans more toward Rouleau's bottom-up approach. For Morrison, increased interest in world trade meant greater antipathy among American merchants and mariners toward foreign peoples and places during the Early Republic, when U.S. attitudes were in their most formative state. The winner of the John Lyman Book Award stridently argues that "Americans had imagined the world as disordered and dangerous, deranged by tyranny or steeped in chaos, often deadly, always uncertain, unpredictable, and unstable . . . This vision of the world, more than anything else, shaped Americans' ideas of their place in the world" (p. viii). Big, bold arguments make for good discussions in graduate seminars. And Morrison sticks to his guns throughout the book. Greater volumes of direct, long-distance trade between the United States and the world did not shape the contours of American culture in positive ways. Maritime commerce did not produce American cosmopolitans, or citizens of the world. Instead, overseas trade stimulated xenophobia in the early United States. The author has marshalled a great deal of evidence to make his case. Morrison focuses on American attitudes toward four regions: the Ottoman Empire; China; India; and the Great South Sea, which includes the East Indies, Oceania, and the Pacific Northwest portion of North America. Scholars young and old will no doubt enjoy debating the extent to which these four regions constitute "the world"3 (p. viii). Morrison principally relies on mariners' news reports, ships' logs, journals, captivity and travel narratives, and correspondence between merchants to document the formation of American fears of peoples and places in these four regions. Morrison is as theoretically oriented as he is meticulous in his research methods. He uses Lorgia Garcia-Pena's postcolonial theories on archival silences to unpack the ways in which eighteenth...
期刊介绍:
Reviews in American History provides an effective means for scholars and students of American history to stay up to date in their discipline. Each issue presents in-depth reviews of over thirty of the newest books in American history. Retrospective essays examining landmark works by major historians are also regularly featured. The journal covers all areas of American history including economics, military history, women in history, law, political history and philosophy, religion, social history, intellectual history, and cultural history. Readers can expect continued coverage of both traditional and new subjects of American history, always blending the recognition of recent developments with the ongoing importance of the core matter of the field.