Meryl C. Nath, Blake Frey, Joycelyn Atchison, Jessica A. Schmitt
{"title":"青少年1型糖尿病与高科技使用在血糖结局上的差异持续存在","authors":"Meryl C. Nath, Blake Frey, Joycelyn Atchison, Jessica A. Schmitt","doi":"10.1155/2023/6646582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Racial disparities are well described in glycemic outcomes in youth with Type 1 diabetes mellites (T1D). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has some limitations in comparing glycemia across patient groups as there are individual variations in mean glucose and HbA1c. Objective. This study aimed to compare glycemic metrics obtained from (Dexcom G6) continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device with HbA1c levels controlling for race, age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin pump use with glycemic control. Subjects and Methods. Data analyzed included 188 patients, majority non-Hispanic White (NHW) (n = 147, 78.2%) and majority privately insured (n = 147, 78.2%). Half of the patients were using insulin pumps, (n = 94, 50.0%) and approximately half were female. Median age was 16.6 (interquartile range: 14.2–18.2) years old with a median age of diabetes diagnosis at 9.3-years old. Results. Significant differences were observed between NHW and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients in terms of HbA1c, 90-day mean glucose, and 90-day time >250 mg/dL (>13.9 mmol/L) (7.6% vs. 9.2%, 181 mg/dL vs. 220 mg/dL, and 16.3% vs. 34.7%, respectively, <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M1\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> for all comparisons). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to predict the influence of age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin administration on glycemic outcomes. Regression analysis revealed significant equations for all glycemic outcomes, demonstrating a strong correlation ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M2\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M3\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn> </math> , and <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M4\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn> </math> , respectively). However, after controlling for these variables, only race and duration of diabetes remained independently associated with glycemic outcomes, suggesting that these factors strongly influence glycemic control independent of age, sex, insurance, and pump use. Conclusion. Even in a subset of youth with T1D using CGM with high rates of insulin pump use, disparities in glycemic outcomes persist. When evaluating glycemic outcomes, race remained a significant cofactor despite controlling for age, duration of diabetes, sex, insurance status, and insulin administration type. These results add to the existing literature, and demonstrate race remains strong predictor of glycemic outcomes.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Glycemic Outcomes Persist in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and High-Technology Use\",\"authors\":\"Meryl C. Nath, Blake Frey, Joycelyn Atchison, Jessica A. Schmitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/6646582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Racial disparities are well described in glycemic outcomes in youth with Type 1 diabetes mellites (T1D). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has some limitations in comparing glycemia across patient groups as there are individual variations in mean glucose and HbA1c. Objective. This study aimed to compare glycemic metrics obtained from (Dexcom G6) continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device with HbA1c levels controlling for race, age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin pump use with glycemic control. Subjects and Methods. Data analyzed included 188 patients, majority non-Hispanic White (NHW) (n = 147, 78.2%) and majority privately insured (n = 147, 78.2%). Half of the patients were using insulin pumps, (n = 94, 50.0%) and approximately half were female. Median age was 16.6 (interquartile range: 14.2–18.2) years old with a median age of diabetes diagnosis at 9.3-years old. Results. Significant differences were observed between NHW and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients in terms of HbA1c, 90-day mean glucose, and 90-day time >250 mg/dL (>13.9 mmol/L) (7.6% vs. 9.2%, 181 mg/dL vs. 220 mg/dL, and 16.3% vs. 34.7%, respectively, <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M1\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> for all comparisons). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to predict the influence of age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin administration on glycemic outcomes. Regression analysis revealed significant equations for all glycemic outcomes, demonstrating a strong correlation ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M2\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M3\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn> </math> , and <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M4\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn> </math> , respectively). However, after controlling for these variables, only race and duration of diabetes remained independently associated with glycemic outcomes, suggesting that these factors strongly influence glycemic control independent of age, sex, insurance, and pump use. Conclusion. Even in a subset of youth with T1D using CGM with high rates of insulin pump use, disparities in glycemic outcomes persist. When evaluating glycemic outcomes, race remained a significant cofactor despite controlling for age, duration of diabetes, sex, insurance status, and insulin administration type. These results add to the existing literature, and demonstrate race remains strong predictor of glycemic outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6646582\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6646582","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景。种族差异在青年1型糖尿病患者(T1D)的血糖结局中得到了很好的描述。血红蛋白糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)在比较不同患者组的血糖方面有一定的局限性,因为平均葡萄糖和HbA1c存在个体差异。目标。本研究旨在比较从(Dexcom G6)连续血糖监测仪(CGM)获得的血糖指标与控制HbA1c水平的种族、年龄、糖尿病病程、种族、保险状况和胰岛素泵使用与血糖控制。研究对象和方法。数据分析包括188例患者,大多数是非西班牙裔白人(NHW) (n = 147, 78.2%)和大多数私人保险(n = 147, 78.2%)。半数患者使用胰岛素泵(n = 94, 50.0%),约半数为女性。中位年龄为16.6岁(四分位数间距:14.2-18.2),糖尿病诊断的中位年龄为9.3岁。结果。NHW和非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)患者在HbA1c、90天平均血糖和90天时间>250 mg/dL (>13.9 mmol/L)方面分别观察到显著差异(7.6% vs. 9.2%, 181 mg/dL vs. 220 mg/dL, 16.3% vs. 34.7%, p <0.001为所有比较)。采用多元线性回归分析预测年龄、糖尿病病程、种族、保险状况和胰岛素给药对血糖结局的影响。回归分析揭示了所有血糖结局的显著方程,显示出强相关性(p <0.0001, p = 0.0001, p <分别为0.0001)。然而,在控制了这些变量后,只有种族和糖尿病病程仍然与血糖结局独立相关,这表明这些因素强烈影响血糖控制,而不受年龄、性别、保险和泵使用的影响。结论。即使在使用CGM且胰岛素泵使用率高的青年T1D患者中,血糖结局的差异仍然存在。在评估血糖结局时,种族仍然是一个重要的辅助因素,尽管控制了年龄、糖尿病病程、性别、保险状况和胰岛素给药类型。这些结果补充了现有文献,并证明种族仍然是血糖结局的有力预测因子。
Disparities in Glycemic Outcomes Persist in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and High-Technology Use
Background. Racial disparities are well described in glycemic outcomes in youth with Type 1 diabetes mellites (T1D). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has some limitations in comparing glycemia across patient groups as there are individual variations in mean glucose and HbA1c. Objective. This study aimed to compare glycemic metrics obtained from (Dexcom G6) continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device with HbA1c levels controlling for race, age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin pump use with glycemic control. Subjects and Methods. Data analyzed included 188 patients, majority non-Hispanic White (NHW) (n = 147, 78.2%) and majority privately insured (n = 147, 78.2%). Half of the patients were using insulin pumps, (n = 94, 50.0%) and approximately half were female. Median age was 16.6 (interquartile range: 14.2–18.2) years old with a median age of diabetes diagnosis at 9.3-years old. Results. Significant differences were observed between NHW and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients in terms of HbA1c, 90-day mean glucose, and 90-day time >250 mg/dL (>13.9 mmol/L) (7.6% vs. 9.2%, 181 mg/dL vs. 220 mg/dL, and 16.3% vs. 34.7%, respectively, for all comparisons). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to predict the influence of age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin administration on glycemic outcomes. Regression analysis revealed significant equations for all glycemic outcomes, demonstrating a strong correlation ( , , and , respectively). However, after controlling for these variables, only race and duration of diabetes remained independently associated with glycemic outcomes, suggesting that these factors strongly influence glycemic control independent of age, sex, insurance, and pump use. Conclusion. Even in a subset of youth with T1D using CGM with high rates of insulin pump use, disparities in glycemic outcomes persist. When evaluating glycemic outcomes, race remained a significant cofactor despite controlling for age, duration of diabetes, sex, insurance status, and insulin administration type. These results add to the existing literature, and demonstrate race remains strong predictor of glycemic outcomes.