形式的危机。现代逻辑悖论及其对现象学的意义

IF 0.8 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY HUSSERL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-07 DOI:10.1007/s10743-023-09337-5
Gabriele Baratelli
{"title":"形式的危机。现代逻辑悖论及其对现象学的意义","authors":"Gabriele Baratelli","doi":"10.1007/s10743-023-09337-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The goal of this paper is to provide an account of the role played by logic in the context of what Husserl names the “crisis of European sciences.” Presupposing the analyses offered in the Krisis , I look at Formale und Transzendentale Logik to demonstrate that the crisis of logic stems from the deviation of its original meaning as a “theory of science” and from its restriction to a mere “theoretical technique.” Through a comparison between Aristotelian syllogistic and modern logic, I show why the modern discovery of the purely formal dimension of knowledge which makes possible such a mathematical technization is a positive achievement that hinders at the same time the disclosure of the truly philosophical nature of logic. The correct appraisal of this ambiguous phenomenon will explain why the rise of modern logic represents a decisive challenge for the success of Husserl’s late phenomenological project.","PeriodicalId":44408,"journal":{"name":"HUSSERL STUDIES","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Crisis of the Form. The Paradox of Modern Logic and its Meaning for Phenomenology\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Baratelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10743-023-09337-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The goal of this paper is to provide an account of the role played by logic in the context of what Husserl names the “crisis of European sciences.” Presupposing the analyses offered in the Krisis , I look at Formale und Transzendentale Logik to demonstrate that the crisis of logic stems from the deviation of its original meaning as a “theory of science” and from its restriction to a mere “theoretical technique.” Through a comparison between Aristotelian syllogistic and modern logic, I show why the modern discovery of the purely formal dimension of knowledge which makes possible such a mathematical technization is a positive achievement that hinders at the same time the disclosure of the truly philosophical nature of logic. The correct appraisal of this ambiguous phenomenon will explain why the rise of modern logic represents a decisive challenge for the success of Husserl’s late phenomenological project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HUSSERL STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HUSSERL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-023-09337-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUSSERL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-023-09337-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文的目的是提供逻辑在胡塞尔所称的“欧洲科学危机”的背景下所扮演的角色的说明。假设《危机》中所提供的分析,我考察了形式与超越逻辑,以证明逻辑的危机源于其作为“科学理论”的原始意义的偏离,以及它对纯粹的“理论技术”的限制。通过对亚里士多德三段论和现代逻辑的比较,我说明了为什么现代对知识的纯粹形式维度的发现使这种数学技术化成为可能,这是一项积极的成就,同时也阻碍了对逻辑的真正哲学本质的揭示。对这一模棱两可现象的正确评价将解释为什么现代逻辑的兴起对胡塞尔晚期现象学计划的成功构成了决定性的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Crisis of the Form. The Paradox of Modern Logic and its Meaning for Phenomenology
Abstract The goal of this paper is to provide an account of the role played by logic in the context of what Husserl names the “crisis of European sciences.” Presupposing the analyses offered in the Krisis , I look at Formale und Transzendentale Logik to demonstrate that the crisis of logic stems from the deviation of its original meaning as a “theory of science” and from its restriction to a mere “theoretical technique.” Through a comparison between Aristotelian syllogistic and modern logic, I show why the modern discovery of the purely formal dimension of knowledge which makes possible such a mathematical technization is a positive achievement that hinders at the same time the disclosure of the truly philosophical nature of logic. The correct appraisal of this ambiguous phenomenon will explain why the rise of modern logic represents a decisive challenge for the success of Husserl’s late phenomenological project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HUSSERL STUDIES
HUSSERL STUDIES PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
30.80%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Husserl Studies is an international forum for the presentation, discussion, criticism, and development of Husserl''s philosophy. It also publishes papers devoted to systematic investigations in the various philosophical sub-areas of phenomenological research (e.g., theory of intentionality, theory of meaning, ethics and action theory, etc.), where such work is oriented toward the development, adaptation, and/or criticism of Husserlian phenomenology. Husserl Studies also invites contributions dealing with phenomenology in relation to other directions in philosophy such as hermeneutics, critical theory, and the various modes of analytic philosophy. The aim, in keeping with Husserl''s own philosophical self-understanding, is to demonstrate that phenomenology is a reflective and methodologically disciplined form of philosophical inquiry that can and must prove itself through its handling of concrete problems. Thus Husserl Studies provides a venue for careful textual work on Husserl''s published and unpublished writings and for historical, systematic, and problem-oriented phenomenological inquiry. It also publishes critical reviews of current work on Husserl, and reviews of other philosophical literature that has a direct bearing on the themes and areas of interest to Husserl Studies.
期刊最新文献
An Affect “That Shudders Me”: An Approach to Husserl’s Phenomenology of Joy The ludic praxis. Phenomenological perspectives The Ethical Attitude: A Husserlian Account of Striving to Be a Good Person Husserl and Disjunctivism Revisited The Role of Self-Movement in the Constitution of the Shared World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1