Mitchell Tindall, Beth Atkinson, Jordan Sanders, Sarah Beadle, James Pharmer
{"title":"以人为本的人工智能在海军航空中的应用","authors":"Mitchell Tindall, Beth Atkinson, Jordan Sanders, Sarah Beadle, James Pharmer","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The doubling of artificial intelligence (AI) performance every six months (Sevilla et al., 2022) during the last decade necessitates that the application of these capabilities in high stakes settings not be done arbitrarily. Defining a structured, human-centered process increases the likelihood that the application of AI is done safely, effectively, and efficiently. Such a process, which considers both AI and automation, should start by identifying clear definitions to guide categorization of capabilities. A recent literature review identified 28 definitions for AI (Collins et al., 2021), to include AI being “…the ability of a machine to perform cognitive functions…problem solving, [and] decision-making.” Due to their complexity, investments in developing models can reach the millions (Maslej et al., 2023). Alternatively, automation can be defined as “…something which runs itself with little to no human interaction…” and guided by specific rules (GeeksforGeeks, 2022). Unique to AI is the ability to learn and evolve (GeeksforGeeks, 2022). With these definitions, the next step should focus on a comprehensive review of targeted domain tasks. This would include understanding the associated knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs), as well as the tasks’ criticality, frequency, and difficulty. Such information is generally a product of (cognitive) task analysis and/or front end analysis and is valuable when building criteria for the appropriateness of AI/automation. A recommended next step should include reengagement with experienced end-users, which is imperative for ensuring a comprehensive understanding of tasks and for yielding valuable insight into AI applications. This poster will provide an overview of the steps undertaken for initial consideration of AI and automation within a Navy domain, to include exclusion criteria and lessons learned with regard to applying this process. Finally, results will include estimated applicability of AI/automation technologies as related to current tasking in relevant aviation platforms.","PeriodicalId":470195,"journal":{"name":"AHFE international","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Human-Centered Approach to Artificial Intelligence Applications in Naval Aviation\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell Tindall, Beth Atkinson, Jordan Sanders, Sarah Beadle, James Pharmer\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1004216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The doubling of artificial intelligence (AI) performance every six months (Sevilla et al., 2022) during the last decade necessitates that the application of these capabilities in high stakes settings not be done arbitrarily. Defining a structured, human-centered process increases the likelihood that the application of AI is done safely, effectively, and efficiently. Such a process, which considers both AI and automation, should start by identifying clear definitions to guide categorization of capabilities. A recent literature review identified 28 definitions for AI (Collins et al., 2021), to include AI being “…the ability of a machine to perform cognitive functions…problem solving, [and] decision-making.” Due to their complexity, investments in developing models can reach the millions (Maslej et al., 2023). Alternatively, automation can be defined as “…something which runs itself with little to no human interaction…” and guided by specific rules (GeeksforGeeks, 2022). Unique to AI is the ability to learn and evolve (GeeksforGeeks, 2022). With these definitions, the next step should focus on a comprehensive review of targeted domain tasks. This would include understanding the associated knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs), as well as the tasks’ criticality, frequency, and difficulty. Such information is generally a product of (cognitive) task analysis and/or front end analysis and is valuable when building criteria for the appropriateness of AI/automation. A recommended next step should include reengagement with experienced end-users, which is imperative for ensuring a comprehensive understanding of tasks and for yielding valuable insight into AI applications. This poster will provide an overview of the steps undertaken for initial consideration of AI and automation within a Navy domain, to include exclusion criteria and lessons learned with regard to applying this process. Finally, results will include estimated applicability of AI/automation technologies as related to current tasking in relevant aviation platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":470195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AHFE international\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AHFE international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AHFE international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在过去十年中,人工智能(AI)性能每六个月翻一番(Sevilla等人,2022年),这就要求不能随意地在高风险环境中应用这些功能。定义一个结构化的、以人为中心的流程增加了安全、有效和高效地完成人工智能应用的可能性。这样一个同时考虑人工智能和自动化的过程,应该从确定明确的定义开始,以指导能力的分类。最近的一篇文献综述确定了人工智能的28种定义(Collins et al., 2021),其中包括“……机器执行认知功能……解决问题和决策的能力”。由于它们的复杂性,开发模型的投资可以达到数百万美元(Maslej et al., 2023)。另外,自动化可以被定义为“……在很少或没有人类交互的情况下自行运行的东西……”,并由特定规则指导(GeeksforGeeks, 2022)。人工智能的独特之处在于学习和进化的能力(GeeksforGeeks, 2022)。有了这些定义,下一步应该关注目标领域任务的全面回顾。这将包括理解相关的知识、技能和能力(KSAs),以及任务的重要性、频率和难度。这些信息通常是(认知)任务分析和/或前端分析的产物,在构建人工智能/自动化的适当性标准时很有价值。建议的下一步应该包括与有经验的最终用户重新接触,这对于确保对任务的全面理解以及对人工智能应用产生有价值的见解是必不可少的。这张海报将概述在海军领域内初步考虑人工智能和自动化所采取的步骤,包括排除标准和应用这一过程的经验教训。最后,结果将包括与相关航空平台当前任务相关的人工智能/自动化技术的估计适用性。
A Human-Centered Approach to Artificial Intelligence Applications in Naval Aviation
The doubling of artificial intelligence (AI) performance every six months (Sevilla et al., 2022) during the last decade necessitates that the application of these capabilities in high stakes settings not be done arbitrarily. Defining a structured, human-centered process increases the likelihood that the application of AI is done safely, effectively, and efficiently. Such a process, which considers both AI and automation, should start by identifying clear definitions to guide categorization of capabilities. A recent literature review identified 28 definitions for AI (Collins et al., 2021), to include AI being “…the ability of a machine to perform cognitive functions…problem solving, [and] decision-making.” Due to their complexity, investments in developing models can reach the millions (Maslej et al., 2023). Alternatively, automation can be defined as “…something which runs itself with little to no human interaction…” and guided by specific rules (GeeksforGeeks, 2022). Unique to AI is the ability to learn and evolve (GeeksforGeeks, 2022). With these definitions, the next step should focus on a comprehensive review of targeted domain tasks. This would include understanding the associated knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs), as well as the tasks’ criticality, frequency, and difficulty. Such information is generally a product of (cognitive) task analysis and/or front end analysis and is valuable when building criteria for the appropriateness of AI/automation. A recommended next step should include reengagement with experienced end-users, which is imperative for ensuring a comprehensive understanding of tasks and for yielding valuable insight into AI applications. This poster will provide an overview of the steps undertaken for initial consideration of AI and automation within a Navy domain, to include exclusion criteria and lessons learned with regard to applying this process. Finally, results will include estimated applicability of AI/automation technologies as related to current tasking in relevant aviation platforms.