生物技术行业的风险与回报

Hassan Bruneo, Emanuela Giacomini, Giuliano Iannotta, Anant Murthy, Julien Patris
{"title":"生物技术行业的风险与回报","authors":"Hassan Bruneo, Emanuela Giacomini, Giuliano Iannotta, Anant Murthy, Julien Patris","doi":"10.1108/ijppm-04-2023-0179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Biotech companies stand as key actors in pharmaceutical innovation. The high risk and long timelines inherent with their R&D investments might hinder their access to funding, potentially stifling innovation. This study aims to explore into the appeal of biotech companies to capital market investors, whose financial backing could bolster the growth of the biotechnology sector. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a dataset of 774 US publicly listed biotech firms to investigate their risk and return characteristics by comparing them to pharmaceutical firms and a sample of matched non-biotech R&D-intensive firms over the sample period 1980–2021. Tests show that the conclusions remain consistent across diverse methodological approaches. Findings The paper shows that biotech companies are riskier than the average firm in the market index but outperform on a risk-adjusted basis both the market and a matched group of R&D-intensive firms. This is particularly true for large capitalization biotech, which is also shown to provide a diversification benefit by reducing the downside risk in past crisis periods. Originality/value This paper provides insight relevant to the current debate about the overall performance of the biotech industry in terms of policy changes and their impact on small, early-stage biotech firms. While small and early-stage biotech firms are playing an increasing role in scientific innovation, this study confirms their greater vulnerability to financial risks and the importance of access to capital markets in enabling those companies to survive and evolve into larger biotech.","PeriodicalId":47944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","volume":"36 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk and return in the biotech industry\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Bruneo, Emanuela Giacomini, Giuliano Iannotta, Anant Murthy, Julien Patris\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijppm-04-2023-0179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Biotech companies stand as key actors in pharmaceutical innovation. The high risk and long timelines inherent with their R&D investments might hinder their access to funding, potentially stifling innovation. This study aims to explore into the appeal of biotech companies to capital market investors, whose financial backing could bolster the growth of the biotechnology sector. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a dataset of 774 US publicly listed biotech firms to investigate their risk and return characteristics by comparing them to pharmaceutical firms and a sample of matched non-biotech R&D-intensive firms over the sample period 1980–2021. Tests show that the conclusions remain consistent across diverse methodological approaches. Findings The paper shows that biotech companies are riskier than the average firm in the market index but outperform on a risk-adjusted basis both the market and a matched group of R&D-intensive firms. This is particularly true for large capitalization biotech, which is also shown to provide a diversification benefit by reducing the downside risk in past crisis periods. Originality/value This paper provides insight relevant to the current debate about the overall performance of the biotech industry in terms of policy changes and their impact on small, early-stage biotech firms. While small and early-stage biotech firms are playing an increasing role in scientific innovation, this study confirms their greater vulnerability to financial risks and the importance of access to capital markets in enabling those companies to survive and evolve into larger biotech.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-04-2023-0179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-04-2023-0179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物技术公司是制药创新的关键角色。他们的研发投资固有的高风险和长时间可能会阻碍他们获得资金,潜在地扼杀创新。本研究旨在探讨生物技术公司对资本市场投资者的吸引力,资本市场投资者的资金支持可以促进生物技术部门的增长。设计/方法/方法本文使用了774家美国上市生物技术公司的数据集,通过将它们与制药公司和匹配的非生物技术研发密集型公司的样本进行比较,研究了它们的风险和回报特征。试验表明,结论在不同的方法方法中保持一致。研究发现,生物技术公司在市场指数上的风险高于一般公司,但在风险调整的基础上,其表现优于市场和匹配的研发密集型公司。对于大型资本化的生物技术来说尤其如此,在过去的危机时期,生物技术也被证明可以通过降低下行风险来提供多样化的好处。本文从政策变化及其对小型、早期生物技术公司的影响的角度,提供了与当前关于生物技术行业整体表现的辩论相关的见解。虽然小型和早期的生物技术公司在科学创新中发挥着越来越大的作用,但这项研究证实了它们更容易受到金融风险的影响,以及进入资本市场对于使这些公司生存并发展成为更大的生物技术公司的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk and return in the biotech industry
Purpose Biotech companies stand as key actors in pharmaceutical innovation. The high risk and long timelines inherent with their R&D investments might hinder their access to funding, potentially stifling innovation. This study aims to explore into the appeal of biotech companies to capital market investors, whose financial backing could bolster the growth of the biotechnology sector. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a dataset of 774 US publicly listed biotech firms to investigate their risk and return characteristics by comparing them to pharmaceutical firms and a sample of matched non-biotech R&D-intensive firms over the sample period 1980–2021. Tests show that the conclusions remain consistent across diverse methodological approaches. Findings The paper shows that biotech companies are riskier than the average firm in the market index but outperform on a risk-adjusted basis both the market and a matched group of R&D-intensive firms. This is particularly true for large capitalization biotech, which is also shown to provide a diversification benefit by reducing the downside risk in past crisis periods. Originality/value This paper provides insight relevant to the current debate about the overall performance of the biotech industry in terms of policy changes and their impact on small, early-stage biotech firms. While small and early-stage biotech firms are playing an increasing role in scientific innovation, this study confirms their greater vulnerability to financial risks and the importance of access to capital markets in enabling those companies to survive and evolve into larger biotech.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
9.70%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: ■Organisational design and methods ■Performance management ■Performance measurement tools and techniques ■Process analysis, engineering and re-engineering ■Quality and business excellence management Articles can address these topics theoretically or empirically through either a descriptive or critical approach. The co-Editors support articles that significantly bring new knowledge to the area both for academics and practitioners. The material for publication in IJPPM should be written in a manner which makes it accessible to its entire wide-ranging readership. Submissions of highly technical or mathematically-oriented papers are discouraged.
期刊最新文献
Industry 5.0's pillars and Lean Six Sigma: mapping the current interrelationship and future research directions Exploring the critical drivers of blockchain technology adoption in Indian industries using the best-worst method Process mining-enhanced quality management in food processing industries Enhancing new service development effectiveness: the role of customer participation and the moderating effects of empowerment and satisfaction Emotional intelligence as an antecedent of employees’ job outcomes through knowledge sharing in IT-ITeS firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1