利用调试作为跨学科学习的平台

IF 2.3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Cognition and Instruction Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1080/07370008.2023.2270094
Nicole Panorkou, Toni York, Erell Germia
{"title":"利用调试作为跨学科学习的平台","authors":"Nicole Panorkou, Toni York, Erell Germia","doi":"10.1080/07370008.2023.2270094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn this paper we discuss the types of knowledge used by six middle school students as they engaged with a debugging task designed to integrate ideas from computer science, mathematics and science. Our findings show that the computational thinking practice of debugging is a rich source of opportunities to integrate these different disciplines. The analysis illustrates how the types of knowledge the students did and did not use at each step of the debugging process were related to their ability to succeed at each step. Our work contributes to theory and practice by uncovering implications for studying debugging through two refined frameworks and for designing debugging tasks to support transdisciplinary learning. AcknowledgementsThe data presented, statements made, and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. We would like to thank our earth science colleague Jay Singh for his help in the design of the rock cycle module. The rock cycle diagram used in the George’s Life simulation includes a sediment image from Michael C. Rygel’s \"Ripples\" photo found on Wikipedia in October 2018. All other images used in the diagram are public domain found on Wikipedia in October 2018. Scratch is developed by the Lifelong Kindergarten Group at the MIT Media Lab. See http://scratch.mit.edu. We would also like to thank the editor Pratim Sengupta and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive feedback in earlier versions of this manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation [#1742125].","PeriodicalId":47945,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Instruction","volume":" 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Debugging as a Platform for Transdisciplinary Learning\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Panorkou, Toni York, Erell Germia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07370008.2023.2270094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractIn this paper we discuss the types of knowledge used by six middle school students as they engaged with a debugging task designed to integrate ideas from computer science, mathematics and science. Our findings show that the computational thinking practice of debugging is a rich source of opportunities to integrate these different disciplines. The analysis illustrates how the types of knowledge the students did and did not use at each step of the debugging process were related to their ability to succeed at each step. Our work contributes to theory and practice by uncovering implications for studying debugging through two refined frameworks and for designing debugging tasks to support transdisciplinary learning. AcknowledgementsThe data presented, statements made, and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. We would like to thank our earth science colleague Jay Singh for his help in the design of the rock cycle module. The rock cycle diagram used in the George’s Life simulation includes a sediment image from Michael C. Rygel’s \\\"Ripples\\\" photo found on Wikipedia in October 2018. All other images used in the diagram are public domain found on Wikipedia in October 2018. Scratch is developed by the Lifelong Kindergarten Group at the MIT Media Lab. See http://scratch.mit.edu. We would also like to thank the editor Pratim Sengupta and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive feedback in earlier versions of this manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation [#1742125].\",\"PeriodicalId\":47945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"volume\":\" 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2023.2270094\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2023.2270094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了六名中学生在进行一项旨在整合计算机科学、数学和科学思想的调试任务时所使用的知识类型。我们的研究结果表明,调试的计算思维实践是整合这些不同学科的丰富机会来源。分析说明了学生在调试过程的每个步骤中使用和不使用的知识类型如何与他们在每个步骤中取得成功的能力相关。我们的工作有助于理论和实践,揭示了通过两个改进框架研究调试的含义,并设计调试任务以支持跨学科学习。所提供的数据、所作的陈述和所表达的观点仅由作者负责。我们要感谢我们的地球科学同事Jay Singh在岩石循环模块的设计中提供的帮助。“乔治的生命”模拟中使用的岩石循环图包括2018年10月在维基百科上发现的迈克尔·c·里格尔(Michael C. Rygel)的“涟漪”照片中的沉积物图像。图表中使用的所有其他图像都是2018年10月在维基百科上找到的公共领域。Scratch是由麻省理工学院媒体实验室的终身幼儿园小组开发的。见http://scratch.mit.edu。我们还要感谢编辑Pratim Sengupta和匿名审稿人在本手稿早期版本中提供的宝贵和建设性的反馈。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究得到了国家科学基金会的资助[#1742125]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Debugging as a Platform for Transdisciplinary Learning
AbstractIn this paper we discuss the types of knowledge used by six middle school students as they engaged with a debugging task designed to integrate ideas from computer science, mathematics and science. Our findings show that the computational thinking practice of debugging is a rich source of opportunities to integrate these different disciplines. The analysis illustrates how the types of knowledge the students did and did not use at each step of the debugging process were related to their ability to succeed at each step. Our work contributes to theory and practice by uncovering implications for studying debugging through two refined frameworks and for designing debugging tasks to support transdisciplinary learning. AcknowledgementsThe data presented, statements made, and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. We would like to thank our earth science colleague Jay Singh for his help in the design of the rock cycle module. The rock cycle diagram used in the George’s Life simulation includes a sediment image from Michael C. Rygel’s "Ripples" photo found on Wikipedia in October 2018. All other images used in the diagram are public domain found on Wikipedia in October 2018. Scratch is developed by the Lifelong Kindergarten Group at the MIT Media Lab. See http://scratch.mit.edu. We would also like to thank the editor Pratim Sengupta and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive feedback in earlier versions of this manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation [#1742125].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Among education journals, Cognition and Instruction"s distinctive niche is rigorous study of foundational issues concerning the mental, socio-cultural, and mediational processes and conditions of learning and intellectual competence. For these purposes, both “cognition” and “instruction” must be interpreted broadly. The journal preferentially attends to the “how” of learning and intellectual practices. A balance of well-reasoned theory and careful and reflective empirical technique is typical.
期刊最新文献
Teacher Cultivation of Classroom Statistical Modeling Practice: A Case Study Learning Inside the School, but Outside the Curriculum: An Extreme Case of Interest-Driven Learning in Alternative STEAM Learning Infrastructure for Schools The Intertwining of Children’s Interests and Micro-Practices at a Science Museum: Case Study of Three Children The Problem With Perspective: Students’ and Teachers’ Reasoning About Credibility During Discussions of Online Sources Collaborative Troubleshooting in STEM: A Case Study of High School Students Finding and Fixing Code, Circuit and Craft Challenges in Electronic Textiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1