{"title":"探索一线员工在服务中幽默风格的相互作用","authors":"Eduardo Oliveira","doi":"10.1080/0267257x.2023.2279154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTOne question that needs to be asked in understanding the consequences of humour in service encounters is whether the prevalent bivariate approaches capture the full range of humour consequences. Therefore, this study examines the influence of frontline employees’ (FLEs) combined use of affiliative and self-defeating humour on customers’ perceptions of service quality in 268 service encounters. Bivariate results show that the positive effect of affiliative humour is much stronger than the negative effect of self-defeating humour. On the contrary, response surface analyses show that bad may be stronger than good. FLEs’ humour use is particularly advantageous with customers who appreciate humour, while for those who do not, there is an optimal margin effect when affiliative humour exceeds self-defeating humour.KEYWORDS: Affiliative humourself-defeating humourperceived service qualityresponse surface analysisfrontline employees' (FLEs) AcknowledgmentsThe author wishes to thank Sandra dos Santos Amaral for her contribution at the data collection stage.Disclosure statementNo potential conflicts of interest were reported by the author.Notes1. Chiew et al. (Citation2019) operationalised other-directed humour with three affiliative humour items, and self-directed humour with three self-defeating items and one self-enhancing item – all items were adapted from Martin et al. (Citation2003).2. X1 and X2 refer to the affiliative humour and self-defeating humour variables, respectively.3. Level 2 refers to the participant level (between-person) and Level 1 to the observation level (within-person).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UIDB/04105/2020].Notes on contributorsEduardo OliveiraEduardo Oliveira is the current director of the Economics and HRM Master Course Director at University of Porto. He teaches organisational behaviour and HRM courses at the Faculty of Economics and at Porto Business School. His research focuses on ageing workforces, decision making, and humor in organisational settings.","PeriodicalId":51383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Management","volume":"32 46","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the interplay between frontline employees’ humour styles in service encounters\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0267257x.2023.2279154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTOne question that needs to be asked in understanding the consequences of humour in service encounters is whether the prevalent bivariate approaches capture the full range of humour consequences. Therefore, this study examines the influence of frontline employees’ (FLEs) combined use of affiliative and self-defeating humour on customers’ perceptions of service quality in 268 service encounters. Bivariate results show that the positive effect of affiliative humour is much stronger than the negative effect of self-defeating humour. On the contrary, response surface analyses show that bad may be stronger than good. FLEs’ humour use is particularly advantageous with customers who appreciate humour, while for those who do not, there is an optimal margin effect when affiliative humour exceeds self-defeating humour.KEYWORDS: Affiliative humourself-defeating humourperceived service qualityresponse surface analysisfrontline employees' (FLEs) AcknowledgmentsThe author wishes to thank Sandra dos Santos Amaral for her contribution at the data collection stage.Disclosure statementNo potential conflicts of interest were reported by the author.Notes1. Chiew et al. (Citation2019) operationalised other-directed humour with three affiliative humour items, and self-directed humour with three self-defeating items and one self-enhancing item – all items were adapted from Martin et al. (Citation2003).2. X1 and X2 refer to the affiliative humour and self-defeating humour variables, respectively.3. Level 2 refers to the participant level (between-person) and Level 1 to the observation level (within-person).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UIDB/04105/2020].Notes on contributorsEduardo OliveiraEduardo Oliveira is the current director of the Economics and HRM Master Course Director at University of Porto. He teaches organisational behaviour and HRM courses at the Faculty of Economics and at Porto Business School. His research focuses on ageing workforces, decision making, and humor in organisational settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing Management\",\"volume\":\"32 46\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2023.2279154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2023.2279154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要在理解服役中幽默的后果时,需要问的一个问题是,流行的双变量方法是否捕捉到了幽默的全部后果。因此,本研究在268次服务遭遇中考察了一线员工联合使用亲和幽默和自我挫败幽默对顾客服务质量感知的影响。双变量结果表明,亲和式幽默的积极效应远大于自我挫败式幽默的消极效应。相反,响应面分析表明,坏可能比好更强。对于那些喜欢幽默的顾客来说,乐士的幽默使用特别有利,而对于那些不喜欢幽默的顾客来说,当亲近的幽默超过自我挫败的幽默时,存在最佳边际效应。关键词:附属幽默、自残幽默、感知服务质量、响应面分析、一线员工致谢作者要感谢Sandra dos Santos Amaral在数据收集阶段的贡献。披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。Chiew等人(Citation2019)用三个附属幽默项目操作化了他人导向幽默,用三个自我挫败项目和一个自我提升项目操作化了自我导向幽默——所有项目都改编自Martin等人(Citation2003)。X1和X2分别为亲和式幽默和自我挫败式幽默变量。第2级是参与者级别(人与人之间),第1级是观察级别(人与人之间)。本研究得到了联合国技术与发展基金会[UIDB/04105/2020]的支持。eduardo Oliveira是波尔图大学经济学和人力资源管理硕士课程主任。他在经济学院和波尔图商学院教授组织行为学和人力资源管理课程。他的研究重点是老龄化的劳动力、决策和组织环境中的幽默。
Exploring the interplay between frontline employees’ humour styles in service encounters
ABSTRACTOne question that needs to be asked in understanding the consequences of humour in service encounters is whether the prevalent bivariate approaches capture the full range of humour consequences. Therefore, this study examines the influence of frontline employees’ (FLEs) combined use of affiliative and self-defeating humour on customers’ perceptions of service quality in 268 service encounters. Bivariate results show that the positive effect of affiliative humour is much stronger than the negative effect of self-defeating humour. On the contrary, response surface analyses show that bad may be stronger than good. FLEs’ humour use is particularly advantageous with customers who appreciate humour, while for those who do not, there is an optimal margin effect when affiliative humour exceeds self-defeating humour.KEYWORDS: Affiliative humourself-defeating humourperceived service qualityresponse surface analysisfrontline employees' (FLEs) AcknowledgmentsThe author wishes to thank Sandra dos Santos Amaral for her contribution at the data collection stage.Disclosure statementNo potential conflicts of interest were reported by the author.Notes1. Chiew et al. (Citation2019) operationalised other-directed humour with three affiliative humour items, and self-directed humour with three self-defeating items and one self-enhancing item – all items were adapted from Martin et al. (Citation2003).2. X1 and X2 refer to the affiliative humour and self-defeating humour variables, respectively.3. Level 2 refers to the participant level (between-person) and Level 1 to the observation level (within-person).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UIDB/04105/2020].Notes on contributorsEduardo OliveiraEduardo Oliveira is the current director of the Economics and HRM Master Course Director at University of Porto. He teaches organisational behaviour and HRM courses at the Faculty of Economics and at Porto Business School. His research focuses on ageing workforces, decision making, and humor in organisational settings.