政治表现与话语民主:政治行动主义解释的特点

Oleksii Anatoliiovych TRETYAK
{"title":"政治表现与话语民主:政治行动主义解释的特点","authors":"Oleksii Anatoliiovych TRETYAK","doi":"10.15421/342317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to clarifying the significance of a political performance, which acts as a theatrical communication action designed to draw society’s attention to the important problems of certain social or political groups. The purpose of the research is to establish the peculiarities of the interpretation of political performance in the paradigmatic and methodological dimensions of modern discursive democracy. The development of political performance under the conditions of the modern Russian-Ukrainian war is characterized. It was found that an important task of modern political science should be considered the identification of paradigmatic dimensions (or “poles”) of analytical judgments regarding the assessment of the significance of political performances. It was emphasized that political performance acts as a postmodern alternative to the realization of the unfinished project of political modernity. The importance of political performance for the discussion of society’s problems at the political level and its dependence on a specific topic and the subjects of its application are analyzed. The importance of public discussion and manifestation as signs of broad involvement of citizens in democratic political activity is revealed. It was found that the ability to express political meaning in a theatrical form is beyond the limits of rational planning and organization. It is revealed that the functionality of political performance stems from its connection with specific social groups. It has been proven that political performances are a form that contradicts the formal procedure of expressing the will and approving the results of the discussion. It has been established that, subject to regulatory support from the state, discussions require voluntary participation and a significant level of competence. It is assumed that political performance can provide certain advantages in political competition due to the imagery and emotionality of the political message. The limited suitability of performance for promoting the values of deliberative democracy has been established, since many cases of the use of performances in the modern period are related to the defense of the right to freedom of speech. It was concluded that in the conditions of political discussions, the importance of political performance consists in creating preliminary conditions for political dialogue.","PeriodicalId":52840,"journal":{"name":"Epistemologichni doslidzhennia u filosofiyi sotsial''nikh i politichnikh naukakh","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLITICAL PERFORMANCE AND DISCURSIVE DEMOCRACY: PECULIARITIES OF THE POLITICAL ACTIONISM`S INTERPRETATION\",\"authors\":\"Oleksii Anatoliiovych TRETYAK\",\"doi\":\"10.15421/342317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to clarifying the significance of a political performance, which acts as a theatrical communication action designed to draw society’s attention to the important problems of certain social or political groups. The purpose of the research is to establish the peculiarities of the interpretation of political performance in the paradigmatic and methodological dimensions of modern discursive democracy. The development of political performance under the conditions of the modern Russian-Ukrainian war is characterized. It was found that an important task of modern political science should be considered the identification of paradigmatic dimensions (or “poles”) of analytical judgments regarding the assessment of the significance of political performances. It was emphasized that political performance acts as a postmodern alternative to the realization of the unfinished project of political modernity. The importance of political performance for the discussion of society’s problems at the political level and its dependence on a specific topic and the subjects of its application are analyzed. The importance of public discussion and manifestation as signs of broad involvement of citizens in democratic political activity is revealed. It was found that the ability to express political meaning in a theatrical form is beyond the limits of rational planning and organization. It is revealed that the functionality of political performance stems from its connection with specific social groups. It has been proven that political performances are a form that contradicts the formal procedure of expressing the will and approving the results of the discussion. It has been established that, subject to regulatory support from the state, discussions require voluntary participation and a significant level of competence. It is assumed that political performance can provide certain advantages in political competition due to the imagery and emotionality of the political message. The limited suitability of performance for promoting the values of deliberative democracy has been established, since many cases of the use of performances in the modern period are related to the defense of the right to freedom of speech. It was concluded that in the conditions of political discussions, the importance of political performance consists in creating preliminary conditions for political dialogue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epistemologichni doslidzhennia u filosofiyi sotsial''nikh i politichnikh naukakh\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epistemologichni doslidzhennia u filosofiyi sotsial''nikh i politichnikh naukakh\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15421/342317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epistemologichni doslidzhennia u filosofiyi sotsial''nikh i politichnikh naukakh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/342317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章致力于澄清政治表演的意义,它作为一种戏剧传播行为,旨在引起社会对某些社会或政治群体的重要问题的关注。本研究的目的是在现代话语民主的范式和方法论维度上确立政治表现解释的独特性。分析了现代俄乌战争条件下政治表演的发展特点。研究发现,现代政治科学的一项重要任务应被视为识别关于评估政治表现重要性的分析判断的范式维度(或“极点”)。强调政治表演作为一种后现代的选择,以实现政治现代性的未完成的工程。分析了政治表现对政治层面讨论社会问题的重要性及其对特定主题和应用主题的依赖。作为公民广泛参与民主政治活动的标志,公共讨论和表现的重要性被揭示出来。人们发现,以戏剧形式表达政治意义的能力超出了理性规划和组织的极限。揭示了政治表演的功能性源于其与特定社会群体的联系。事实证明,政治表演是一种与表达意愿和批准讨论结果的正式程序相矛盾的形式。人们已经确定,在国家监管支持的前提下,讨论需要自愿参与和相当程度的能力。由于政治信息的形象和情感,政治表现可以在政治竞争中提供一定的优势。由于现代许多使用表演的案例都与捍卫言论自由权有关,因此已经确立了表演对促进协商民主价值的有限适用性。会议的结论是,在政治讨论的条件下,政治成绩的重要性在于为政治对话创造初步条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
POLITICAL PERFORMANCE AND DISCURSIVE DEMOCRACY: PECULIARITIES OF THE POLITICAL ACTIONISM`S INTERPRETATION
The article is devoted to clarifying the significance of a political performance, which acts as a theatrical communication action designed to draw society’s attention to the important problems of certain social or political groups. The purpose of the research is to establish the peculiarities of the interpretation of political performance in the paradigmatic and methodological dimensions of modern discursive democracy. The development of political performance under the conditions of the modern Russian-Ukrainian war is characterized. It was found that an important task of modern political science should be considered the identification of paradigmatic dimensions (or “poles”) of analytical judgments regarding the assessment of the significance of political performances. It was emphasized that political performance acts as a postmodern alternative to the realization of the unfinished project of political modernity. The importance of political performance for the discussion of society’s problems at the political level and its dependence on a specific topic and the subjects of its application are analyzed. The importance of public discussion and manifestation as signs of broad involvement of citizens in democratic political activity is revealed. It was found that the ability to express political meaning in a theatrical form is beyond the limits of rational planning and organization. It is revealed that the functionality of political performance stems from its connection with specific social groups. It has been proven that political performances are a form that contradicts the formal procedure of expressing the will and approving the results of the discussion. It has been established that, subject to regulatory support from the state, discussions require voluntary participation and a significant level of competence. It is assumed that political performance can provide certain advantages in political competition due to the imagery and emotionality of the political message. The limited suitability of performance for promoting the values of deliberative democracy has been established, since many cases of the use of performances in the modern period are related to the defense of the right to freedom of speech. It was concluded that in the conditions of political discussions, the importance of political performance consists in creating preliminary conditions for political dialogue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
FEATURES OF MEDIATIZATION OF THE SOCIO-POLITICAL SPHERE IN MODERN UKRAINIAN SOCIETY INNOVATIVE ANALYTICAL AND STATISTICAL TECHNOLOGIES AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING AND COUNTERACTING CORRUPTION PHILOSOPHY OF THE HEART: KAINONIA OF THE UKRAINIAN TRADITION UNDERSTANDING FREEDOM IN THE CREATIVES OF THE REVOLUTION ON THE CRISIS OF CULTURE AND MAN IN THE «FAR-FETCHED» TRADITIONALISM OF R.GUENON
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1