环境和地理在对抗电磁场和风水压力对睡眠的有害影响中的功效

{"title":"环境和地理在对抗电磁场和风水压力对睡眠的有害影响中的功效","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/bscr.02.03.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The aim of this research is to determine the efficacy of Enviroglobe and Geomat in enhancing sleep and other related parameters of a person sleeping in an environment surrounded with natural and manmade sources of EMF. Materials and Methods Sixty-six healthy subjects (44 subjects for Enviroglobe and 22 subjects for Geomat), between 18-60 years were enrolled for this interventional study. The study was conducted at the Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India. Result The comparison of sleep data with and without Enviroglobe in terms of Deep Sleep (78.8 ±53.9) vs (85.3 ±30.5), (p<0.030) was found to be statistically significant. There was a trend towards significance in sleep efficiency score and REM sleep as well. We did not find any statistically significant difference between light sleep and awake time. There was a statistically significant difference between the sleep data with Geomat in terms of Sleep efficiency score (67.4 ±9.7) vs (73.8 ±7.6), p< 0.028 and awake time (61.3 ±15.4) vs (51.0 ±11.5), p<0.021. We did not find any statistically significant difference between REM, deep sleep, and light sleep. Discussion The World Health Organization (WHO) / International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.","PeriodicalId":72393,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical science and clinical research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Enviroglobe and Geomat in Combating the Deleterious Effect of Electromagnetic Fields and Geopathic Stress on Sleep\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/bscr.02.03.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The aim of this research is to determine the efficacy of Enviroglobe and Geomat in enhancing sleep and other related parameters of a person sleeping in an environment surrounded with natural and manmade sources of EMF. Materials and Methods Sixty-six healthy subjects (44 subjects for Enviroglobe and 22 subjects for Geomat), between 18-60 years were enrolled for this interventional study. The study was conducted at the Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India. Result The comparison of sleep data with and without Enviroglobe in terms of Deep Sleep (78.8 ±53.9) vs (85.3 ±30.5), (p<0.030) was found to be statistically significant. There was a trend towards significance in sleep efficiency score and REM sleep as well. We did not find any statistically significant difference between light sleep and awake time. There was a statistically significant difference between the sleep data with Geomat in terms of Sleep efficiency score (67.4 ±9.7) vs (73.8 ±7.6), p< 0.028 and awake time (61.3 ±15.4) vs (51.0 ±11.5), p<0.021. We did not find any statistically significant difference between REM, deep sleep, and light sleep. Discussion The World Health Organization (WHO) / International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical science and clinical research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical science and clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/bscr.02.03.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical science and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/bscr.02.03.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定Enviroglobe和Geomat在改善睡眠和其他相关参数方面的功效,这些参数是一个人在被自然和人为电磁场包围的环境中睡眠的。材料与方法本研究纳入66名年龄在18-60岁之间的健康受试者(Enviroglobe 44名,Geomat 22名)。这项研究是在印度新德里的阿波罗医院进行的。结果使用和不使用Enviroglobe的睡眠数据在深度睡眠方面的比较有统计学意义(78.8±53.9)vs(85.3±30.5),(p<0.030)。睡眠效率评分和快速眼动睡眠也有显著性的趋势。我们没有发现轻度睡眠和清醒时间之间有统计学上的显著差异。睡眠效率评分(67.4±9.7)vs(73.8±7.6),与Geomat的睡眠数据有统计学差异;0.028,清醒时间(61.3±15.4)vs(51.0±11.5);0.021。我们没有发现快速眼动睡眠、深度睡眠和浅睡眠之间有统计学上的显著差异。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)/国际癌症研究机构(国际癌症研究机构)已将射频电磁场列为可能对人类致癌的物质(2B组),其依据是与使用无线电话相关的神经胶质瘤(一种恶性脑癌)的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Enviroglobe and Geomat in Combating the Deleterious Effect of Electromagnetic Fields and Geopathic Stress on Sleep
Introduction The aim of this research is to determine the efficacy of Enviroglobe and Geomat in enhancing sleep and other related parameters of a person sleeping in an environment surrounded with natural and manmade sources of EMF. Materials and Methods Sixty-six healthy subjects (44 subjects for Enviroglobe and 22 subjects for Geomat), between 18-60 years were enrolled for this interventional study. The study was conducted at the Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India. Result The comparison of sleep data with and without Enviroglobe in terms of Deep Sleep (78.8 ±53.9) vs (85.3 ±30.5), (p<0.030) was found to be statistically significant. There was a trend towards significance in sleep efficiency score and REM sleep as well. We did not find any statistically significant difference between light sleep and awake time. There was a statistically significant difference between the sleep data with Geomat in terms of Sleep efficiency score (67.4 ±9.7) vs (73.8 ±7.6), p< 0.028 and awake time (61.3 ±15.4) vs (51.0 ±11.5), p<0.021. We did not find any statistically significant difference between REM, deep sleep, and light sleep. Discussion The World Health Organization (WHO) / International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Enviroglobe and Geomat in Combating the Deleterious Effect of Electromagnetic Fields and Geopathic Stress on Sleep C-Reactive Protein Levels in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease Visiting the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria Assessment of the Seasonal Variations of Lakes Water Quality in Bangladesh Natural Killer Cells: Flare Amidst the Grim Skeletal Effect of Modified Twin Block with Clear Plates Versus Conventional Twin Block in Class II Malocclusions – a Randomized Controlled Trial of Functional Appliances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1