Erick Mejia Uzeda, Mohamed A. Hafez, Mireille E. Broucke
{"title":"系统神经科学中的学习与遗忘:控制视角","authors":"Erick Mejia Uzeda, Mohamed A. Hafez, Mireille E. Broucke","doi":"10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.100912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A longstanding open problem of systems neuroscience is to understand how the brain calibrates thousands of reflexes to achieve near instantaneous disturbance rejection. While reflexes typically act locally at the site of sensory measurements, the adaptation of reflex gains is the result of an ingenious architecture in which knowledge of disturbances is transferred from the cerebellum to the deep cerebellar nuclei or the brainstem. This paper investigates the use of control theory as the mathematical foundation to explain the mechanisms by which such forms of learning, as well as forgetting, manifest themselves in systems neuroscience. Particularly, we use adaptive control and averaging theory to model the computations performed in learning appropriate reflex gains. While forgetting is perceived as counter-productive to learning, we show that if incorporated correctly, it can endow the much needed robustness to train thousands of reflexes without interfering with their adaptation. This is accomplished using the <span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>-modification which achieves robustness of adaptive schemes through the estimation of exciting subspaces. Our techniques are combined in a comprehensive model, with simulations illustrating their effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50750,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reviews in Control","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100912"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning and forgetting in systems neuroscience: A control perspective\",\"authors\":\"Erick Mejia Uzeda, Mohamed A. Hafez, Mireille E. Broucke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.100912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A longstanding open problem of systems neuroscience is to understand how the brain calibrates thousands of reflexes to achieve near instantaneous disturbance rejection. While reflexes typically act locally at the site of sensory measurements, the adaptation of reflex gains is the result of an ingenious architecture in which knowledge of disturbances is transferred from the cerebellum to the deep cerebellar nuclei or the brainstem. This paper investigates the use of control theory as the mathematical foundation to explain the mechanisms by which such forms of learning, as well as forgetting, manifest themselves in systems neuroscience. Particularly, we use adaptive control and averaging theory to model the computations performed in learning appropriate reflex gains. While forgetting is perceived as counter-productive to learning, we show that if incorporated correctly, it can endow the much needed robustness to train thousands of reflexes without interfering with their adaptation. This is accomplished using the <span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>-modification which achieves robustness of adaptive schemes through the estimation of exciting subspaces. Our techniques are combined in a comprehensive model, with simulations illustrating their effectiveness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Reviews in Control\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Reviews in Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578823000767\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reviews in Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578823000767","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Learning and forgetting in systems neuroscience: A control perspective
A longstanding open problem of systems neuroscience is to understand how the brain calibrates thousands of reflexes to achieve near instantaneous disturbance rejection. While reflexes typically act locally at the site of sensory measurements, the adaptation of reflex gains is the result of an ingenious architecture in which knowledge of disturbances is transferred from the cerebellum to the deep cerebellar nuclei or the brainstem. This paper investigates the use of control theory as the mathematical foundation to explain the mechanisms by which such forms of learning, as well as forgetting, manifest themselves in systems neuroscience. Particularly, we use adaptive control and averaging theory to model the computations performed in learning appropriate reflex gains. While forgetting is perceived as counter-productive to learning, we show that if incorporated correctly, it can endow the much needed robustness to train thousands of reflexes without interfering with their adaptation. This is accomplished using the -modification which achieves robustness of adaptive schemes through the estimation of exciting subspaces. Our techniques are combined in a comprehensive model, with simulations illustrating their effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
The field of Control is changing very fast now with technology-driven “societal grand challenges” and with the deployment of new digital technologies. The aim of Annual Reviews in Control is to provide comprehensive and visionary views of the field of Control, by publishing the following types of review articles:
Survey Article: Review papers on main methodologies or technical advances adding considerable technical value to the state of the art. Note that papers which purely rely on mechanistic searches and lack comprehensive analysis providing a clear contribution to the field will be rejected.
Vision Article: Cutting-edge and emerging topics with visionary perspective on the future of the field or how it will bridge multiple disciplines, and
Tutorial research Article: Fundamental guides for future studies.