卡伦·沃伦伦理学中的生态女性主义本体论

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY Ethics and the Environment Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.2979/een.2023.a899188
M. Laurel-Leigh Meierdiercks
{"title":"卡伦·沃伦伦理学中的生态女性主义本体论","authors":"M. Laurel-Leigh Meierdiercks","doi":"10.2979/een.2023.a899188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In this paper I argue that ecofeminist theory needs a clearly stated ontological grounding in order to strengthen its ethical framework. In Karen Warren's work, she proposes an ecofeminist ethic delineated by \"boundary conditions\" which determine the approaches that cohere to ecofeminist concerns. One such condition is a reconceptualization of \"what it is to be human.\" Here I trace the ontological assumptions present in Karen Warren's work in order to argue for the acceptance of a feminist, relational and context-dependent ontology as a boundary condition of an ecofeminist ethic. I propose that Karen Warren's approach to ontology functions similarly to her ethic in that she allows for a pluralistic approach to ontology and presents a number of boundary conditions that limit which ontologies can be deemed \"ecofeminist ontologies.\" I conclude that Warren's ethic and ontology are closely intertwined and suggest that further ontological analysis of ecofeminist work could strengthen the growing field of ecofeminist ethics.","PeriodicalId":54127,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and the Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecofeminist Ontology in Karen Warren's Ethic\",\"authors\":\"M. Laurel-Leigh Meierdiercks\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/een.2023.a899188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: In this paper I argue that ecofeminist theory needs a clearly stated ontological grounding in order to strengthen its ethical framework. In Karen Warren's work, she proposes an ecofeminist ethic delineated by \\\"boundary conditions\\\" which determine the approaches that cohere to ecofeminist concerns. One such condition is a reconceptualization of \\\"what it is to be human.\\\" Here I trace the ontological assumptions present in Karen Warren's work in order to argue for the acceptance of a feminist, relational and context-dependent ontology as a boundary condition of an ecofeminist ethic. I propose that Karen Warren's approach to ontology functions similarly to her ethic in that she allows for a pluralistic approach to ontology and presents a number of boundary conditions that limit which ontologies can be deemed \\\"ecofeminist ontologies.\\\" I conclude that Warren's ethic and ontology are closely intertwined and suggest that further ontological analysis of ecofeminist work could strengthen the growing field of ecofeminist ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics and the Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/een.2023.a899188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/een.2023.a899188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文认为生态女性主义理论需要一个明确的本体论基础,以加强其伦理框架。在卡伦·沃伦(Karen Warren)的著作中,她提出了一种由“边界条件”界定的生态女性主义伦理,它决定了与生态女性主义关注的问题相一致的方法。其中一个条件是对“作为人是什么”的重新概念化。在这里,我追溯了卡伦·沃伦(Karen Warren)作品中的本体论假设,以论证接受女权主义、关系和上下文依赖的本体论作为生态女性主义伦理的边界条件。我认为卡伦·沃伦的本体论方法与她的伦理学功能相似,因为她允许对本体论采取多元化的方法,并提出了一些边界条件,限制了哪些本体论可以被视为“生态女性主义本体论”。我的结论是,沃伦的伦理学和本体论是紧密交织在一起的,并建议对生态女性主义作品进行进一步的本体论分析,可以加强生态女性主义伦理学这一不断发展的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecofeminist Ontology in Karen Warren's Ethic
Abstract: In this paper I argue that ecofeminist theory needs a clearly stated ontological grounding in order to strengthen its ethical framework. In Karen Warren's work, she proposes an ecofeminist ethic delineated by "boundary conditions" which determine the approaches that cohere to ecofeminist concerns. One such condition is a reconceptualization of "what it is to be human." Here I trace the ontological assumptions present in Karen Warren's work in order to argue for the acceptance of a feminist, relational and context-dependent ontology as a boundary condition of an ecofeminist ethic. I propose that Karen Warren's approach to ontology functions similarly to her ethic in that she allows for a pluralistic approach to ontology and presents a number of boundary conditions that limit which ontologies can be deemed "ecofeminist ontologies." I conclude that Warren's ethic and ontology are closely intertwined and suggest that further ontological analysis of ecofeminist work could strengthen the growing field of ecofeminist ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mapping Gendered Ecologies: Engaging with and Beyond Ecowomanism and Ecofeminism by K. Melchor Quick Hall and Gwyn Kirk (review) Missing Voices of Ecofeminism in Environmental Governance: Consequences and Future Directions Ecofeminist Ontology in Karen Warren's Ethic 'I am cringe, but I am free': A Reparative Reading of Assuming the Ecosexual Position Karen J. Warren: Her Work in The Making of Ecofeminism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1