增强工程教育中的用户体验和可用性:多功能和有形用户界面的比较分析

Manjit Singh Sidhu, Jee Geak Ying
{"title":"增强工程教育中的用户体验和可用性:多功能和有形用户界面的比较分析","authors":"Manjit Singh Sidhu, Jee Geak Ying","doi":"10.1177/03064190231205415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students’ preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach within a controlled environment to analyse the difference in rankings of engineering applications. The study also measured learnability and assessed the software quality using questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction. The multiple function UI was found to be statistically significant more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. The study provides reliable evidence that multiple function UI is a better option in engineering education than TUI.","PeriodicalId":75028,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of mechanical engineering education","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces\",\"authors\":\"Manjit Singh Sidhu, Jee Geak Ying\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03064190231205415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students’ preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach within a controlled environment to analyse the difference in rankings of engineering applications. The study also measured learnability and assessed the software quality using questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction. The multiple function UI was found to be statistically significant more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. The study provides reliable evidence that multiple function UI is a better option in engineering education than TUI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of mechanical engineering education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of mechanical engineering education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190231205415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of mechanical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190231205415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Tenaga国立大学进行了一项研究,比较了工科学生在使用增强现实技术用户界面(UI)应用程序解决选定工程问题时的偏好。该研究在受控环境中采用了横断面设计和Wilcoxon符号秩检验方法来分析工程应用排名的差异。研究还测量了可学习性,并使用用户交互满意度问卷评估了软件质量。对工科学生来说,多功能UI比有形用户界面(TUI)更有效。该研究提供了可靠的证据,证明多功能用户界面是工程教育中比用户界面更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces
A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students’ preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach within a controlled environment to analyse the difference in rankings of engineering applications. The study also measured learnability and assessed the software quality using questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction. The multiple function UI was found to be statistically significant more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. The study provides reliable evidence that multiple function UI is a better option in engineering education than TUI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation and benefits of hybrid methodology: Flipped classroom and project-based learning in mechanical engineering courses An integrated e-learning approach for teaching statics to undergraduate engineering students Active learning modules for a numerical methods course Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces Impact of 3D-printed laboratory equipment in vibrations and controls courses on student engineering identity, motivation, and mindset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1