日照毛条虫在中国引起日本麦冬叶枯病

Fungal systematics and evolution Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3114/fuse.2023.11.03-supp

{"title":"日照毛条虫在中国引起日本麦冬叶枯病","authors":"","doi":"10.3114/fuse.2023.11.03-supp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Suppplementary information: Fig. S1. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using ITS sequence data of Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553) and B. obtusa (CMW 8232). Ex-type strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue. Fig. S2. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using LSU sequence data of the Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553). Ex-type strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue. Fig. S3. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using tef sequence data of the Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria obtusa (CMW 8232). Ex-type strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue. Fig. S4. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using act sequence data of the Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553) and B. obtusa (CMW 8232). Extype strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue. Table S1. Morphological comparison of species in the P. concentrica species complex.","PeriodicalId":73121,"journal":{"name":"Fungal systematics and evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phyllosticta rizhaoensis sp. nov. causing leaf blight of Ophiopogon japonicus in China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.3114/fuse.2023.11.03-supp\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Suppplementary information: Fig. S1. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using ITS sequence data of Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553) and B. obtusa (CMW 8232). Ex-type strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue. Fig. S2. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using LSU sequence data of the Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553). Ex-type strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue. Fig. S3. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using tef sequence data of the Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria obtusa (CMW 8232). Ex-type strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue. Fig. S4. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using act sequence data of the Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553) and B. obtusa (CMW 8232). Extype strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue. Table S1. Morphological comparison of species in the P. concentrica species complex.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fungal systematics and evolution\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fungal systematics and evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2023.11.03-supp\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal systematics and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2023.11.03-supp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

补充信息: 图S1。利用集中毛竹种复合体ITS序列数据进行ML分析得到系统发育树。分支上方的数字表示ML自举(左，ML≥50%)和贝叶斯后验概率(右，BPP≥0.9)。该树的根是Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553)和B. obtusa (CMW 8232)。前型菌株以粗体表示。本研究分离的菌株用蓝色标记。 图S2。利用集中毛竹种复合体LSU序列数据进行ML分析得到系统发育树。分支上方的数字表示ML自举(左，ML≥50%)和贝叶斯后验概率(右，BPP≥0.9)。这棵树的根是Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553)。前型菌株以粗体表示。本研究分离的菌株用蓝色标记。 图S3。利用集中毛竹种复合体的tef序列数据进行ML分析得到系统发育树。分支上方的数字表示ML自举(左，ML≥50%)和贝叶斯后验概率(右，BPP≥0.9)。这棵树的根是Botryosphaeria obtusa (CMW 8232)。前型菌株以粗体表示。本研究分离的菌株用蓝色标记。 图S4。利用集中毛竹种复合体的动作序列数据进行ML分析得到系统发育树。分支上方的数字表示ML自举(左，ML≥50%)和贝叶斯后验概率(右，BPP≥0.9)。该树的根是Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553)和B. obtusa (CMW 8232)。外型菌株以粗体表示。本研究分离的菌株用蓝色标记。 表S1。同心木种复合体中种的形态比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Phyllosticta rizhaoensis sp. nov. causing leaf blight of Ophiopogon japonicus in China

Suppplementary information:
Fig. S1. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using ITS sequence data of Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553) and B. obtusa (CMW 8232). Ex-type strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue.
Fig. S2. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using LSU sequence data of the Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553). Ex-type strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue.
Fig. S3. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using tef sequence data of the Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria obtusa (CMW 8232). Ex-type strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue.
Fig. S4. Phylogenetic tree obtained by ML analyses using act sequence data of the Phyllosticta concentrica species complex. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML ≥ 50 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Botryosphaeria stevensii (CBS 112553) and B. obtusa (CMW 8232). Extype strains are indicated in bold. Isolates from the present study are marked in blue.
Table S1. Morphological comparison of species in the P. concentrica species complex.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Fungal systematics and evolution

CiteScore

7.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量