贾坎德邦旱雨生态不同作物管理方式下水稻品种评价

Verma BC, Saha S, Singh CV, Srivastava AK, Prasad SM, Roy S, Banerjee A, Priyamedha -, Bhagat S, Mandal NP
{"title":"贾坎德邦旱雨生态不同作物管理方式下水稻品种评价","authors":"Verma BC, Saha S, Singh CV, Srivastava AK, Prasad SM, Roy S, Banerjee A, Priyamedha -, Bhagat S, Mandal NP","doi":"10.58297/fthr4599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rice is the life and livelihood of Indians and the fact is more appropriate to the eastern part of the country. Rainfed and drought prone upland rice contributes a significant part of the total rice cultivation not only in India but also at the global level. However, the productivity is very low as compared to other rice-ecosystems. Hybrids were released from many institutions having several advantages and limitations. Comparative evaluation of rice hybrids and high yielding varieties (HYVs) under transplanting and direct seeding conditions is necessary to obtain a comparative picture. A field trial was conducted for three consecutive years to compare HYVs and popular hybrids under integrated crop management in drought prone rainfed ecology. Results of the experiment revealed that higher number of tillers were noted under wet-direct seeding, whereas increased application of fertilizer dose did not influence tillering under both direct seeding (DSR) and transplanting methods of crop establishment. Number of panicles per unit area also showed similar trend as tiller number and it was found that number of panicles were more in DSR as compared to transplanted rice. Grain yield between the transplanted and DSR is comparable, however, reduction in yield was higher in case of hybrids when switched from transplanted to DSR as compared to HYVs. Hence, it can be concluded that, in the drought prone rainfed areas HYVs should be preferred for cultivation over hybrids under DSR as there is diminishing scope of transplanted rice cultivation.","PeriodicalId":17022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rice Research and Developments","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Rice Varieties Under Different Crop Management Options in Rainfed and Drought Prone Ecology of Jharkhand\",\"authors\":\"Verma BC, Saha S, Singh CV, Srivastava AK, Prasad SM, Roy S, Banerjee A, Priyamedha -, Bhagat S, Mandal NP\",\"doi\":\"10.58297/fthr4599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rice is the life and livelihood of Indians and the fact is more appropriate to the eastern part of the country. Rainfed and drought prone upland rice contributes a significant part of the total rice cultivation not only in India but also at the global level. However, the productivity is very low as compared to other rice-ecosystems. Hybrids were released from many institutions having several advantages and limitations. Comparative evaluation of rice hybrids and high yielding varieties (HYVs) under transplanting and direct seeding conditions is necessary to obtain a comparative picture. A field trial was conducted for three consecutive years to compare HYVs and popular hybrids under integrated crop management in drought prone rainfed ecology. Results of the experiment revealed that higher number of tillers were noted under wet-direct seeding, whereas increased application of fertilizer dose did not influence tillering under both direct seeding (DSR) and transplanting methods of crop establishment. Number of panicles per unit area also showed similar trend as tiller number and it was found that number of panicles were more in DSR as compared to transplanted rice. Grain yield between the transplanted and DSR is comparable, however, reduction in yield was higher in case of hybrids when switched from transplanted to DSR as compared to HYVs. Hence, it can be concluded that, in the drought prone rainfed areas HYVs should be preferred for cultivation over hybrids under DSR as there is diminishing scope of transplanted rice cultivation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rice Research and Developments\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rice Research and Developments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58297/fthr4599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rice Research and Developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58297/fthr4599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大米是印度人的生活和生计,这一事实更适合印度东部地区。旱作水稻不仅在印度,而且在全球范围内都占水稻种植总量的很大一部分。然而,与其他水稻生态系统相比,其生产力非常低。许多机构推出的混合动力车具有一些优点和局限性。在移栽和直播条件下对水稻杂交种和高产品种进行比较评价是获得比较概况的必要条件。在干旱易发的雨养生态区,连续3年进行了杂交品种和普通杂交品种综合管理的田间试验。试验结果表明,湿法直播能显著提高分蘖数,而在直播和移栽两种作物建立方式下,施肥量的增加对分蘖没有影响。单位面积的穗数与分蘖数也有相似的变化趋势,并且发现DSR的穗数比移栽水稻多。移栽和DSR之间的籽粒产量相当,但是,与hyv相比,从移栽转DSR的杂交种产量下降幅度更高。因此,在干旱易发的雨养地区,由于移栽水稻的种植范围缩小,在DSR下,hyv比杂交种更适合种植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Rice Varieties Under Different Crop Management Options in Rainfed and Drought Prone Ecology of Jharkhand
Rice is the life and livelihood of Indians and the fact is more appropriate to the eastern part of the country. Rainfed and drought prone upland rice contributes a significant part of the total rice cultivation not only in India but also at the global level. However, the productivity is very low as compared to other rice-ecosystems. Hybrids were released from many institutions having several advantages and limitations. Comparative evaluation of rice hybrids and high yielding varieties (HYVs) under transplanting and direct seeding conditions is necessary to obtain a comparative picture. A field trial was conducted for three consecutive years to compare HYVs and popular hybrids under integrated crop management in drought prone rainfed ecology. Results of the experiment revealed that higher number of tillers were noted under wet-direct seeding, whereas increased application of fertilizer dose did not influence tillering under both direct seeding (DSR) and transplanting methods of crop establishment. Number of panicles per unit area also showed similar trend as tiller number and it was found that number of panicles were more in DSR as compared to transplanted rice. Grain yield between the transplanted and DSR is comparable, however, reduction in yield was higher in case of hybrids when switched from transplanted to DSR as compared to HYVs. Hence, it can be concluded that, in the drought prone rainfed areas HYVs should be preferred for cultivation over hybrids under DSR as there is diminishing scope of transplanted rice cultivation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Plant's Role in Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Furrow-irrigated Rice Missed Nursing Care in a Second-Level Surgical Care Area in Northern Italy: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Study of the Effect of Sowing Date and Sowing Method on Yield of New Rice Varieties in the Senegal River Valley under Low Temperatures Flood-Irrigated Rice Response to Fertilizer-Phosphorus Sources in a Phosphorus-Deficient Silt-Loam Soil Evaluation of Rice Varieties Under Different Crop Management Options in Rainfed and Drought Prone Ecology of Jharkhand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1