无变异、α、δ和欧米克隆变异的COVID-19患者初始胸部CT图像的比较:一项回顾性研究

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.2174/011573398x268050231031112211
Emrah Altuntas, Meltem Ceyhan Bilgici, Muzaffer Elmalı, Arda Onar, Orhan Bas
{"title":"无变异、α、δ和欧米克隆变异的COVID-19患者初始胸部CT图像的比较:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Emrah Altuntas, Meltem Ceyhan Bilgici, Muzaffer Elmalı, Arda Onar, Orhan Bas","doi":"10.2174/011573398x268050231031112211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:: CT findings and Ground glass opacity (GGO) volumes may differ between SARS CoV-2 non-variant, alpha, delta, and omicron variants. Objective:: To compare the thoracic CT findings, GGO volumes, and GGOs’ lung uptake rates among patients with COVID-19 variants. Methods:: Thoracic CT images of 83 patients with non-variant, 78 patients with alpha variant, 93 patients with delta variant, and 73 patients with omicron variant having positive Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test results were analyzed retrospectively. GGO volumes and lung volumes were calculated by using the Cavalieri Principle. Differences in CT findings, ground-glass opacity volumes, and lung involvement rates between non-variant and variant groups were evaluated. Results:: There were significant differences found in the incidence of GGOs (p < 0.001), air bronchogram (p = 0.007), reticulation (p = 0.002) and subpleural lines, and linear opacities (p = 0.034) between non-variant and variant groups. GGO uptake rates (ground glass opacity volumes × 100 ÷ lung volume) were 8.88% in the non-variant, 4.83% in the alpha variant, 3.50% in the delta variant, and 2.02% in the omicron variant. In estimating variant groups, it was determined that the increase in the rate of GGOs in the right lung increased the probability of having an omicron variant, whereas the presence of nodules decreased it. The possibility of the delta variant increased with an increase in the rate of ground glass opacities in the left lung. Conclusion:: Thoracic CT findings solely can be helpful in distinguishing COVID-19 variants. Decreased frequency of uptake rates of GGOs suggested that the severity of COVID-19 disease was gradually decreasing.","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":"73 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Initial Thoracic CT Images of COVID-19 Patients with Non-Variant, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron Variants: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Emrah Altuntas, Meltem Ceyhan Bilgici, Muzaffer Elmalı, Arda Onar, Orhan Bas\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/011573398x268050231031112211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:: CT findings and Ground glass opacity (GGO) volumes may differ between SARS CoV-2 non-variant, alpha, delta, and omicron variants. Objective:: To compare the thoracic CT findings, GGO volumes, and GGOs’ lung uptake rates among patients with COVID-19 variants. Methods:: Thoracic CT images of 83 patients with non-variant, 78 patients with alpha variant, 93 patients with delta variant, and 73 patients with omicron variant having positive Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test results were analyzed retrospectively. GGO volumes and lung volumes were calculated by using the Cavalieri Principle. Differences in CT findings, ground-glass opacity volumes, and lung involvement rates between non-variant and variant groups were evaluated. Results:: There were significant differences found in the incidence of GGOs (p < 0.001), air bronchogram (p = 0.007), reticulation (p = 0.002) and subpleural lines, and linear opacities (p = 0.034) between non-variant and variant groups. GGO uptake rates (ground glass opacity volumes × 100 ÷ lung volume) were 8.88% in the non-variant, 4.83% in the alpha variant, 3.50% in the delta variant, and 2.02% in the omicron variant. In estimating variant groups, it was determined that the increase in the rate of GGOs in the right lung increased the probability of having an omicron variant, whereas the presence of nodules decreased it. The possibility of the delta variant increased with an increase in the rate of ground glass opacities in the left lung. Conclusion:: Thoracic CT findings solely can be helpful in distinguishing COVID-19 variants. Decreased frequency of uptake rates of GGOs suggested that the severity of COVID-19 disease was gradually decreasing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\"73 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573398x268050231031112211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573398x268050231031112211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:CT表现和磨玻璃不透明(GGO)体积在SARS - CoV-2非变异、α、δ和组粒变异之间可能有所不同。目的:比较COVID-19变异体患者的胸部CT表现、GGO体积和GGO肺摄取率。方法:回顾性分析实时聚合酶链反应试验阳性83例无变异、78例α变异、93例δ变异、73例组粒变异的胸部CT图像。采用卡瓦列里原理计算GGO体积和肺体积。评估非变异组和变异组在CT表现、毛玻璃混浊体积和肺部受累率方面的差异。结果:两组间GGOs发生率差异有统计学意义(p <0.001)、支气管空气征(p = 0.007)、网状(p = 0.002)和胸膜下线,以及线状混浊(p = 0.034)。GGO吸收率(磨砂玻璃混浊体积× 100 ÷肺体积)在非变异组中为8.88%,在α变异组中为4.83%,在δ变异组中为3.50%,在组微米变异组中为2.02%。在估计变异组时,确定右肺中GGOs率的增加增加了具有组粒变异的可能性,而结节的存在则降低了这种可能性。随着左肺磨玻璃混浊率的增加,δ型变异的可能性增加。结论:仅胸部CT表现有助于区分COVID-19的变异。GGOs摄取频率的下降表明COVID-19疾病的严重程度正在逐渐降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Initial Thoracic CT Images of COVID-19 Patients with Non-Variant, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron Variants: A Retrospective Study
Background:: CT findings and Ground glass opacity (GGO) volumes may differ between SARS CoV-2 non-variant, alpha, delta, and omicron variants. Objective:: To compare the thoracic CT findings, GGO volumes, and GGOs’ lung uptake rates among patients with COVID-19 variants. Methods:: Thoracic CT images of 83 patients with non-variant, 78 patients with alpha variant, 93 patients with delta variant, and 73 patients with omicron variant having positive Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test results were analyzed retrospectively. GGO volumes and lung volumes were calculated by using the Cavalieri Principle. Differences in CT findings, ground-glass opacity volumes, and lung involvement rates between non-variant and variant groups were evaluated. Results:: There were significant differences found in the incidence of GGOs (p < 0.001), air bronchogram (p = 0.007), reticulation (p = 0.002) and subpleural lines, and linear opacities (p = 0.034) between non-variant and variant groups. GGO uptake rates (ground glass opacity volumes × 100 ÷ lung volume) were 8.88% in the non-variant, 4.83% in the alpha variant, 3.50% in the delta variant, and 2.02% in the omicron variant. In estimating variant groups, it was determined that the increase in the rate of GGOs in the right lung increased the probability of having an omicron variant, whereas the presence of nodules decreased it. The possibility of the delta variant increased with an increase in the rate of ground glass opacities in the left lung. Conclusion:: Thoracic CT findings solely can be helpful in distinguishing COVID-19 variants. Decreased frequency of uptake rates of GGOs suggested that the severity of COVID-19 disease was gradually decreasing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on respiratory diseases and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Lung Function and Quality of Life in COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Study Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Group 1 (Part A): Overview, Classification, Clinical Subsets, and Workup Deteriorating Pulmonary Functions in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis- A Pilot Study From South India COVID-19 Vaccines and the Menstrual Cycle: A Cross-Sectional Study NAT2 Gene Variants as a Provocative Factor for the Severe Course of COVID-19 Pneumonia in Ukrainian Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1