Heather A. Swienton, Alberto Giordano, Ronald R. Hagelman III
{"title":"当让孩子画地图时,他们会画什么?心理地图实验的结果","authors":"Heather A. Swienton, Alberto Giordano, Ronald R. Hagelman III","doi":"10.3138/cart-2022-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When asked to draw a map reflecting on their experience, what do children draw? The authors offer possible answers through the eyes of children aged 6 to 14 who visited the Meadows Center for Water and the Environment on the campus of Texas State University; the 332 maps children were asked to draw after their visit are the focus. Results indicate that according to children, a map can be qualitatively understood as a graphic representation of the child’s experience that includes people and animals, places, and events, and natural and built environments. Children use both mimetic and abstract symbols that vary in shape, are often used repeatedly to create texture or patterns, and can vary in colour that often—but not always—abide by traditional colour denotations. Cartographic scales, legends, or north arrows are rarely used. The abundant use of written labels or descriptive words on their maps suggests that children understand maps as an expressive form that blends symbols and text. In efforts to contribute to the ultimate questioning of what makes a map a map, this study provides a strong empirical case for the what and how of children’s map-making processes concentrating on traditional cartographic conventions and elements.","PeriodicalId":46104,"journal":{"name":"Cartographica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Do Children Draw When Asked to Draw a Map? Results of a Mental Map Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Heather A. Swienton, Alberto Giordano, Ronald R. Hagelman III\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/cart-2022-0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When asked to draw a map reflecting on their experience, what do children draw? The authors offer possible answers through the eyes of children aged 6 to 14 who visited the Meadows Center for Water and the Environment on the campus of Texas State University; the 332 maps children were asked to draw after their visit are the focus. Results indicate that according to children, a map can be qualitatively understood as a graphic representation of the child’s experience that includes people and animals, places, and events, and natural and built environments. Children use both mimetic and abstract symbols that vary in shape, are often used repeatedly to create texture or patterns, and can vary in colour that often—but not always—abide by traditional colour denotations. Cartographic scales, legends, or north arrows are rarely used. The abundant use of written labels or descriptive words on their maps suggests that children understand maps as an expressive form that blends symbols and text. In efforts to contribute to the ultimate questioning of what makes a map a map, this study provides a strong empirical case for the what and how of children’s map-making processes concentrating on traditional cartographic conventions and elements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cartographica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cartographica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/cart-2022-0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cartographica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cart-2022-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
What Do Children Draw When Asked to Draw a Map? Results of a Mental Map Experiment
When asked to draw a map reflecting on their experience, what do children draw? The authors offer possible answers through the eyes of children aged 6 to 14 who visited the Meadows Center for Water and the Environment on the campus of Texas State University; the 332 maps children were asked to draw after their visit are the focus. Results indicate that according to children, a map can be qualitatively understood as a graphic representation of the child’s experience that includes people and animals, places, and events, and natural and built environments. Children use both mimetic and abstract symbols that vary in shape, are often used repeatedly to create texture or patterns, and can vary in colour that often—but not always—abide by traditional colour denotations. Cartographic scales, legends, or north arrows are rarely used. The abundant use of written labels or descriptive words on their maps suggests that children understand maps as an expressive form that blends symbols and text. In efforts to contribute to the ultimate questioning of what makes a map a map, this study provides a strong empirical case for the what and how of children’s map-making processes concentrating on traditional cartographic conventions and elements.
期刊介绍:
Cartographica is dedicated to publishing articles on all aspects of cartographic and geovisualization research while maintaining its tradition of publishing material on cartographic thought, the history of cartography, and cartography and society. Cartographica also plans to consolidate its trend towards publishing research contributions that focus primarily on geographic information. Each volume of Cartographica is comprised of four issues: two or three regular issues and one or two single-topic monographs. These special monograph issues, accommodating book-length manuscripts, provide an extensive look at one particular area of cartography.