不同材料激光金属沉积中单轨包层质量的预测:基于机器学习方法的比较

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Laser Applications Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.2351/7.0001108
Pascal Paulus, Yannick Ruppert, Michael Vielhaber, Juergen Griebsch
{"title":"不同材料激光金属沉积中单轨包层质量的预测:基于机器学习方法的比较","authors":"Pascal Paulus, Yannick Ruppert, Michael Vielhaber, Juergen Griebsch","doi":"10.2351/7.0001108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Powder-based laser metal deposition (LMD) offers a promising additive manufacturing process, given the large number of available materials for cladding or generative applications. In laser cladding of dissimilar materials, it is necessary to control the mixing of substrate and additive in the interaction zone to ensure safe metallurgical bonding while avoiding critical chemical compositions that lead to undesired phase precipitation. However, the generation of empirical data for LMD process development is very challenging and time-consuming. In this context, different machine learning models are examined to identify whether they can converge with a small amount of empirical data. In this work, the prediction accuracy of back propagation neural network (BPNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was compared using mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). A hyperparameter optimization was performed for each model. The materials used are 316L as the substrate and VDM Alloy 780 as the additive. The dataset used consists of 40 empirically determined values. The input parameters are laser power, feed rate, and powder mass flow rate. The quality characteristics of height, width, dilution, Fe-amount, and seam contour are defined as outputs. As a result, the predictions were compared with retained validation data and described as MSE and MAPE to determine the prediction accuracy for the models. BPNN achieved a prediction accuracy of 0.0072 MSE and 4.37% MAPE and XGBoost of 0.0084 MSE and 6.34% MAPE. The most accurate prediction was achieved by LSTM with 0.0053 MSE and 3.75% MAPE.","PeriodicalId":50168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laser Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of single track clad quality in laser metal deposition using dissimilar materials: Comparison of machine learning-based approaches\",\"authors\":\"Pascal Paulus, Yannick Ruppert, Michael Vielhaber, Juergen Griebsch\",\"doi\":\"10.2351/7.0001108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Powder-based laser metal deposition (LMD) offers a promising additive manufacturing process, given the large number of available materials for cladding or generative applications. In laser cladding of dissimilar materials, it is necessary to control the mixing of substrate and additive in the interaction zone to ensure safe metallurgical bonding while avoiding critical chemical compositions that lead to undesired phase precipitation. However, the generation of empirical data for LMD process development is very challenging and time-consuming. In this context, different machine learning models are examined to identify whether they can converge with a small amount of empirical data. In this work, the prediction accuracy of back propagation neural network (BPNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was compared using mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). A hyperparameter optimization was performed for each model. The materials used are 316L as the substrate and VDM Alloy 780 as the additive. The dataset used consists of 40 empirically determined values. The input parameters are laser power, feed rate, and powder mass flow rate. The quality characteristics of height, width, dilution, Fe-amount, and seam contour are defined as outputs. As a result, the predictions were compared with retained validation data and described as MSE and MAPE to determine the prediction accuracy for the models. BPNN achieved a prediction accuracy of 0.0072 MSE and 4.37% MAPE and XGBoost of 0.0084 MSE and 6.34% MAPE. The most accurate prediction was achieved by LSTM with 0.0053 MSE and 3.75% MAPE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laser Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laser Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2351/7.0001108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laser Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2351/7.0001108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粉末基激光金属沉积(LMD)提供了一种很有前途的增材制造工艺,因为有大量可用的材料用于包层或生成应用。在异种材料激光熔覆过程中,必须控制基体和添加剂在相互作用区内的混合,以确保安全的冶金熔接,同时避免导致不良相析出的关键化学成分。然而,为LMD工艺开发生成经验数据是非常具有挑战性和耗时的。在这种情况下,检查不同的机器学习模型,以确定它们是否可以与少量经验数据收敛。在这项工作中,使用均方误差(MSE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)比较了反向传播神经网络(BPNN)、长短期记忆(LSTM)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)的预测精度。对每个模型进行超参数优化。所采用的材料是316L作为基体,VDM Alloy 780作为添加剂。使用的数据集由40个经验确定的值组成。输入参数为激光功率、进给速率和粉末质量流量。将高度、宽度、贫化度、铁量、煤层轮廓等质量特征定义为产出。结果,将预测结果与保留的验证数据进行比较,并将其描述为MSE和MAPE,以确定模型的预测精度。BPNN的预测精度为0.0072 MSE和4.37% MAPE, XGBoost的预测精度为0.0084 MSE和6.34% MAPE。LSTM预测最准确,MSE为0.0053,MAPE为3.75%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of single track clad quality in laser metal deposition using dissimilar materials: Comparison of machine learning-based approaches
Powder-based laser metal deposition (LMD) offers a promising additive manufacturing process, given the large number of available materials for cladding or generative applications. In laser cladding of dissimilar materials, it is necessary to control the mixing of substrate and additive in the interaction zone to ensure safe metallurgical bonding while avoiding critical chemical compositions that lead to undesired phase precipitation. However, the generation of empirical data for LMD process development is very challenging and time-consuming. In this context, different machine learning models are examined to identify whether they can converge with a small amount of empirical data. In this work, the prediction accuracy of back propagation neural network (BPNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was compared using mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). A hyperparameter optimization was performed for each model. The materials used are 316L as the substrate and VDM Alloy 780 as the additive. The dataset used consists of 40 empirically determined values. The input parameters are laser power, feed rate, and powder mass flow rate. The quality characteristics of height, width, dilution, Fe-amount, and seam contour are defined as outputs. As a result, the predictions were compared with retained validation data and described as MSE and MAPE to determine the prediction accuracy for the models. BPNN achieved a prediction accuracy of 0.0072 MSE and 4.37% MAPE and XGBoost of 0.0084 MSE and 6.34% MAPE. The most accurate prediction was achieved by LSTM with 0.0053 MSE and 3.75% MAPE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laser Applications (JLA) is the scientific platform of the Laser Institute of America (LIA) and is published in cooperation with AIP Publishing. The high-quality articles cover a broad range from fundamental and applied research and development to industrial applications. Therefore, JLA is a reflection of the state-of-R&D in photonic production, sensing and measurement as well as Laser safety. The following international and well known first-class scientists serve as allocated Editors in 9 new categories: High Precision Materials Processing with Ultrafast Lasers Laser Additive Manufacturing High Power Materials Processing with High Brightness Lasers Emerging Applications of Laser Technologies in High-performance/Multi-function Materials and Structures Surface Modification Lasers in Nanomanufacturing / Nanophotonics & Thin Film Technology Spectroscopy / Imaging / Diagnostics / Measurements Laser Systems and Markets Medical Applications & Safety Thermal Transportation Nanomaterials and Nanoprocessing Laser applications in Microelectronics.
期刊最新文献
Research on a visual positioning method of paddy field weeding wheels based on laser rangefinder-camera calibration New thermal solver for mitigating surface temperature instability in laser-induced heating Statistical modeling and optimization of clad geometry in laser cladding of Amdry 961 on Inconel 713LC superalloy with response surface methodology Novel path planning algorithm for laser powder bed fusion to improve the scan quality of triply periodic minimal surface structures Laser hazard classification of a line laser with an astigmatic extended source
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1