审判于2008年10月15日开始,并于2008年10月15日结束。333.195/MS由高等法院:不正当行为原则是否适用于根据第333.195/MS号法律所犯的刑事罪行?11.340/06 (Maria da Penha law),如果夫妻随后和解?

Elenita Araújo e Silva Neta
{"title":"审判于2008年10月15日开始,并于2008年10月15日结束。333.195/MS由高等法院:不正当行为原则是否适用于根据第333.195/MS号法律所犯的刑事罪行?11.340/06 (Maria da Penha law),如果夫妻随后和解?","authors":"Elenita Araújo e Silva Neta","doi":"10.29327/2193997.5.2-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work has as its central problem the identification if the principle of improper bagatela can be applied to criminal offenses committed under Law No. 11.340/06, if the subsequent reconciliation of the couple occurs, according to the judgment of HC No. 333.195/MS by the Superior Court of Justice. Therefore, the objective of the article is to analyze whether the reconciliation of the couple would be an authorizing requirement that allows the incidence of this principle or not. Thus, a deductive method was used (starting from a general analysis of the theme, with the study of the Maria da Penha Law to later deal with the judgment of the aforementioned habeas corpus filed by the Public Defender's Office of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul) and the main works of the authors who deal with the theme, such as Luigi Ferrajoli and Roberto Barroso.","PeriodicalId":34528,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O Julgamento do habeas corpus nº. 333.195/MS pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça: pode o princípio da bagatela imprópria ser aplicado às infrações penais cometidas no âmbito da Lei nº. 11.340/06 (Lei Maria da Penha), caso ocorra a reconciliação posterior do casal?\",\"authors\":\"Elenita Araújo e Silva Neta\",\"doi\":\"10.29327/2193997.5.2-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The work has as its central problem the identification if the principle of improper bagatela can be applied to criminal offenses committed under Law No. 11.340/06, if the subsequent reconciliation of the couple occurs, according to the judgment of HC No. 333.195/MS by the Superior Court of Justice. Therefore, the objective of the article is to analyze whether the reconciliation of the couple would be an authorizing requirement that allows the incidence of this principle or not. Thus, a deductive method was used (starting from a general analysis of the theme, with the study of the Maria da Penha Law to later deal with the judgment of the aforementioned habeas corpus filed by the Public Defender's Office of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul) and the main works of the authors who deal with the theme, such as Luigi Ferrajoli and Roberto Barroso.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29327/2193997.5.2-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/2193997.5.2-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的中心问题是,根据高等法院第333.195/MS号最高法院的判决,确定是否可以将不当离婚原则适用于根据第11.340/06号法律所犯的刑事犯罪,如果夫妇随后和解。因此,本文的目的是分析夫妻的和解是否会成为允许这一原则发生的授权要求。因此,采用了演绎的方法(从对主题的一般分析开始,通过对Maria da Penha法的研究,后来处理上述由南马托格罗索州公设辩护人办公室提出的人身保护令的判决)和处理主题的作者的主要作品,如Luigi Ferrajoli和Roberto Barroso。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O Julgamento do habeas corpus nº. 333.195/MS pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça: pode o princípio da bagatela imprópria ser aplicado às infrações penais cometidas no âmbito da Lei nº. 11.340/06 (Lei Maria da Penha), caso ocorra a reconciliação posterior do casal?
The work has as its central problem the identification if the principle of improper bagatela can be applied to criminal offenses committed under Law No. 11.340/06, if the subsequent reconciliation of the couple occurs, according to the judgment of HC No. 333.195/MS by the Superior Court of Justice. Therefore, the objective of the article is to analyze whether the reconciliation of the couple would be an authorizing requirement that allows the incidence of this principle or not. Thus, a deductive method was used (starting from a general analysis of the theme, with the study of the Maria da Penha Law to later deal with the judgment of the aforementioned habeas corpus filed by the Public Defender's Office of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul) and the main works of the authors who deal with the theme, such as Luigi Ferrajoli and Roberto Barroso.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial (RDPDF, vol. 5, n. 2, 2023) Teorias legitimadoras da pena: ciência ou ideologia? Uma análise crítica dos discursos penais dominantes à luz do conceito de ideologia em Marx e Engels Benefícios assistenciais e o critério de renda; um estudo quanto a necessidade de flexibilização das exigências legais para concessão O populismo como democracia-limite a partir da obra "O Século do Populismo": história, teoria e crítica de Pierre Rosanvallon Contra a mediocridade, contra o identitarismo: uma contribuição para o debate público e acadêmico nacional
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1