即兴创作会自相矛盾吗?学习者定位和临时数字中断

IF 2.8 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Management Learning Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1177/13505076231197908
Shehla R Arifeen, Farooq Mughal
{"title":"即兴创作会自相矛盾吗?学习者定位和临时数字中断","authors":"Shehla R Arifeen, Farooq Mughal","doi":"10.1177/13505076231197908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the case of the COVID-19 lockdown as a disruptive event, this article aims to show the paradox of improvisation by investigating students’ experiences of transitioning from in-person to digital learning spaces across three select business schools in Pakistan. Using Foucault, we analyse the discursive strategies deployed by students as they oscillate between different subject positions under improvised digital conditions. Our analysis reveals contradictory views about the agency of the improvised subjects which is often considered as enterprising in the sense that individuals are willing agents of change. Findings suggest that improvisation can also be paradoxically experienced as it misaligns with predispositions of agents. We show this through the struggles of students in getting to grips with the digital move, giving rise to uncertainty. This study, therefore, makes three distinct, yet interrelated, contributions to the literature on management learning by identifying: the risks of taming embodied subjectivities, the changing positionality of learners and the paradox of improvisation. Our work has implications for understanding improvisation in business schools during disruptive events, as overlooking the predispositions of students can lead to an enterprising agency of a different kind (e.g. resistance) that forfeits the purpose of improvisation.","PeriodicalId":47925,"journal":{"name":"Management Learning","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can improvisation be paradoxical? Learner positionality and the improvised digital disruption\",\"authors\":\"Shehla R Arifeen, Farooq Mughal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13505076231197908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the case of the COVID-19 lockdown as a disruptive event, this article aims to show the paradox of improvisation by investigating students’ experiences of transitioning from in-person to digital learning spaces across three select business schools in Pakistan. Using Foucault, we analyse the discursive strategies deployed by students as they oscillate between different subject positions under improvised digital conditions. Our analysis reveals contradictory views about the agency of the improvised subjects which is often considered as enterprising in the sense that individuals are willing agents of change. Findings suggest that improvisation can also be paradoxically experienced as it misaligns with predispositions of agents. We show this through the struggles of students in getting to grips with the digital move, giving rise to uncertainty. This study, therefore, makes three distinct, yet interrelated, contributions to the literature on management learning by identifying: the risks of taming embodied subjectivities, the changing positionality of learners and the paradox of improvisation. Our work has implications for understanding improvisation in business schools during disruptive events, as overlooking the predispositions of students can lead to an enterprising agency of a different kind (e.g. resistance) that forfeits the purpose of improvisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Learning\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076231197908\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076231197908","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以2019冠状病毒病疫情封锁为例,通过调查巴基斯坦三所精选商学院的学生从面对面学习空间过渡到数字学习空间的经历,旨在展示即兴创作的悖论。利用福柯,我们分析了学生在临时数字条件下在不同主体位置之间摇摆时所采用的话语策略。我们的分析揭示了关于即兴主体的代理的矛盾观点,这种代理通常被认为是进取的,因为个人是愿意改变的代理人。研究结果表明,即兴表演也可能是矛盾的体验,因为它与代理人的倾向不一致。我们通过学生在掌握数字移动过程中的挣扎来展示这一点,这带来了不确定性。因此,本研究通过识别:驯服具体化主体性的风险、学习者位置的变化和即兴的悖论,对管理学习的文献做出了三个不同但又相互关联的贡献。我们的工作对理解商学院在破坏性事件中的即兴发挥具有启示意义,因为忽视学生的倾向可能导致一种不同类型的进取机构(例如抵抗),从而丧失即兴发挥的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can improvisation be paradoxical? Learner positionality and the improvised digital disruption
Using the case of the COVID-19 lockdown as a disruptive event, this article aims to show the paradox of improvisation by investigating students’ experiences of transitioning from in-person to digital learning spaces across three select business schools in Pakistan. Using Foucault, we analyse the discursive strategies deployed by students as they oscillate between different subject positions under improvised digital conditions. Our analysis reveals contradictory views about the agency of the improvised subjects which is often considered as enterprising in the sense that individuals are willing agents of change. Findings suggest that improvisation can also be paradoxically experienced as it misaligns with predispositions of agents. We show this through the struggles of students in getting to grips with the digital move, giving rise to uncertainty. This study, therefore, makes three distinct, yet interrelated, contributions to the literature on management learning by identifying: the risks of taming embodied subjectivities, the changing positionality of learners and the paradox of improvisation. Our work has implications for understanding improvisation in business schools during disruptive events, as overlooking the predispositions of students can lead to an enterprising agency of a different kind (e.g. resistance) that forfeits the purpose of improvisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Management Learning
Management Learning MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
29.20%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The nature of management learning - the nature of individual and organizational learning, and the relationships between them; "learning" organizations; learning from the past and for the future; the changing nature of management, of organizations, and of learning The process of learning - learning methods and techniques; processes of thinking; experience and learning; perception and reasoning; agendas of management learning Learning and outcomes - the nature of managerial knowledge, thinking, learning and action; ethics values and skills; expertise; competence; personal and organizational change
期刊最新文献
The sensuous governmentality of glitter: Educating managing women scientists with gleaming STEM Barbies How do inclusive leaders emerge? A theory-based model The weaponization of plagiarism accusations in the era of anti-woke politics Responsibility as weight and space: An aesthetic (re)theorising of responsibility and responsible leadership development for youth Turning complexity into a Delight to the Mind: An integrative framework for teaching and learning complex reasoning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1