河流碳循环中的暗碳固定

IF 3.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 LIMNOLOGY Limnology and Oceanography Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1002/lno.12430
Fausto Machado‐Silva, David Bastviken, Marcio Miranda, Roberta Bittencourt Peixoto, Humberto Marotta, Alex Enrich‐Prast
{"title":"河流碳循环中的暗碳固定","authors":"Fausto Machado‐Silva, David Bastviken, Marcio Miranda, Roberta Bittencourt Peixoto, Humberto Marotta, Alex Enrich‐Prast","doi":"10.1002/lno.12430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Headwater streams are often characterized by turbulence, organic matter inputs from terrestrial systems, net heterotrophy, and the microbial loop supplying carbon and energy for consumers. However, ecological models overlook dark carbon fixation (DCF), the light‐independent inorganic carbon uptake, mainly based on chemosynthesis, using energy yields from redox reactions. The quantification of microbial biomass production, including DCF, heterotrophic production (HP), gross primary production (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (ER) in lotic aquatic systems, has long yet to be addressed. Here, we investigate HP and DCF in water, sediment, and litter in addition to GPP and ER from streams in pristine rainforests in three distinct sub‐basins of the Amazon River, assessing the variety of turbid, black, and clear waters. We observed mean (min–max) values of microbial biomass production of about 0.1 (0.02–1.2), 3.2 (0.8–14.1), and 0.1 (0.02–0.5) mg C m −2 h −1 in water, sediment, and litter samples, in which DCF : HP showed mean (min–max) values of 0.5 (0.2–2), 0.02 (0.001–0.07), and 0.2 (0.001–0.5). Hence, measurements yielded DCF of similar magnitude as HP in water and litter but significantly lower in sediment, indicating that DCF supplied more carbon to planktonic and litter microbes than in top sediments of streams. Literature comparisons show similar DCF and GPP, both being lower than ER in streams. Finally, we found stream DCF higher than in lentic systems, suggesting that flow and turbulence may accelerate chemosynthesis.","PeriodicalId":18143,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dark carbon fixation in stream carbon cycling\",\"authors\":\"Fausto Machado‐Silva, David Bastviken, Marcio Miranda, Roberta Bittencourt Peixoto, Humberto Marotta, Alex Enrich‐Prast\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lno.12430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Headwater streams are often characterized by turbulence, organic matter inputs from terrestrial systems, net heterotrophy, and the microbial loop supplying carbon and energy for consumers. However, ecological models overlook dark carbon fixation (DCF), the light‐independent inorganic carbon uptake, mainly based on chemosynthesis, using energy yields from redox reactions. The quantification of microbial biomass production, including DCF, heterotrophic production (HP), gross primary production (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (ER) in lotic aquatic systems, has long yet to be addressed. Here, we investigate HP and DCF in water, sediment, and litter in addition to GPP and ER from streams in pristine rainforests in three distinct sub‐basins of the Amazon River, assessing the variety of turbid, black, and clear waters. We observed mean (min–max) values of microbial biomass production of about 0.1 (0.02–1.2), 3.2 (0.8–14.1), and 0.1 (0.02–0.5) mg C m −2 h −1 in water, sediment, and litter samples, in which DCF : HP showed mean (min–max) values of 0.5 (0.2–2), 0.02 (0.001–0.07), and 0.2 (0.001–0.5). Hence, measurements yielded DCF of similar magnitude as HP in water and litter but significantly lower in sediment, indicating that DCF supplied more carbon to planktonic and litter microbes than in top sediments of streams. Literature comparisons show similar DCF and GPP, both being lower than ER in streams. Finally, we found stream DCF higher than in lentic systems, suggesting that flow and turbulence may accelerate chemosynthesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Limnology and Oceanography\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Limnology and Oceanography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12430\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12430","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要源流通常具有湍流、陆地系统有机质输入、净异养和为消费者提供碳和能量的微生物循环等特征。然而,生态模型忽略了暗碳固定(DCF),这是一种不依赖于光的无机碳吸收,主要基于化学合成,利用氧化还原反应产生的能量。微生物生物量生产的量化,包括DCF、异养产量(HP)、总初级产量(GPP)和生态系统呼吸(ER),长期以来尚未得到解决。在这里,我们研究了亚马逊河三个不同子流域的原始雨林中的水、沉积物和凋落物中的HP和DCF,以及GPP和ER,评估了浑浊水、黑色水和清澈水的多样性。我们观察到水、沉积物和凋落物样品中微生物生物量产量的平均值(min-max)约为0.1(0.02 - 1.2)、3.2(0.8-14.1)和0.1 (0.02 - 0.5)mg C m - 2 h - 1,其中DCF: HP的平均值(min-max)为0.5(0.2 - 2)、0.02(0.001-0.07)和0.2(0.001-0.5)。因此,测量结果显示,水体和凋落物中的DCF值与HP值相似,但沉积物中的DCF值明显低于HP值,这表明DCF为浮游生物和凋落物微生物提供的碳比溪流顶部沉积物中的DCF值更多。文献比较显示,河流DCF和GPP相似,均低于ER。最后,我们发现水流的DCF高于水流系统,这表明水流和湍流可能会加速化学合成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dark carbon fixation in stream carbon cycling
Abstract Headwater streams are often characterized by turbulence, organic matter inputs from terrestrial systems, net heterotrophy, and the microbial loop supplying carbon and energy for consumers. However, ecological models overlook dark carbon fixation (DCF), the light‐independent inorganic carbon uptake, mainly based on chemosynthesis, using energy yields from redox reactions. The quantification of microbial biomass production, including DCF, heterotrophic production (HP), gross primary production (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (ER) in lotic aquatic systems, has long yet to be addressed. Here, we investigate HP and DCF in water, sediment, and litter in addition to GPP and ER from streams in pristine rainforests in three distinct sub‐basins of the Amazon River, assessing the variety of turbid, black, and clear waters. We observed mean (min–max) values of microbial biomass production of about 0.1 (0.02–1.2), 3.2 (0.8–14.1), and 0.1 (0.02–0.5) mg C m −2 h −1 in water, sediment, and litter samples, in which DCF : HP showed mean (min–max) values of 0.5 (0.2–2), 0.02 (0.001–0.07), and 0.2 (0.001–0.5). Hence, measurements yielded DCF of similar magnitude as HP in water and litter but significantly lower in sediment, indicating that DCF supplied more carbon to planktonic and litter microbes than in top sediments of streams. Literature comparisons show similar DCF and GPP, both being lower than ER in streams. Finally, we found stream DCF higher than in lentic systems, suggesting that flow and turbulence may accelerate chemosynthesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Limnology and Oceanography
Limnology and Oceanography 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography (L&O; print ISSN 0024-3590, online ISSN 1939-5590) publishes original articles, including scholarly reviews, about all aspects of limnology and oceanography. The journal''s unifying theme is the understanding of aquatic systems. Submissions are judged on the originality of their data, interpretations, and ideas, and on the degree to which they can be generalized beyond the particular aquatic system examined. Laboratory and modeling studies must demonstrate relevance to field environments; typically this means that they are bolstered by substantial "real-world" data. Few purely theoretical or purely empirical papers are accepted for review.
期刊最新文献
Advancing an integrated understanding of land–ocean connections in shaping the marine ecosystems of coastal temperate rainforest ecoregions Life in turbulent waters: unsteady biota–flow interactions across scales Genes involved in carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling in an important estuarine ecosystem show coherent shifts in response to changes in environmental conditions Diel dissolved organic matter patterns reflect spatiotemporally varying sources and transformations along an intermittent stream Differential impacts of temperature increase on prokaryotes across temperature regimes in subtropical coastal waters: insights from field experiments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1