{"title":"基于循环系统优化算法的最优潮流分析","authors":"Hüseyin BAKIR","doi":"10.31127/tuje.1282429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimal power flow (OPF) is one of the most challenging optimization problems of power engineering. Owing to the high computational complexity of the OPF problem, a powerful and robust optimization algorithm is required to solve it. This paper has been centered on the optimization of OPF problem using circulatory system-based optimization (CSBO) algorithm. The solution quality of CSBO is compared with the recently introduced state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms i.e., artificial rabbits optimization (ARO), african vultures optimization algorithm (AVOA), and chaos game optimization (CGO). The practicability of the algorithms was evaluated on the IEEE-57 and 118-bus power networks for the optimization of various objectives, i.e., fuel cost, power loss, voltage deviation, and enhancement of voltage stability. Based on OPF results of the IEEE 57-bus power system, it is seen that the best fuel cost and voltage deviation results are calculated to be 41666.2344 $/h and 0.5871 p.u with the CSBO method. Given the OPF results of the IEEE 118-bus power network, it is observed that the CSBO algorithm presented the best fuel cost and active power loss values of 134934.3140 $/h, and 16.4688 MW. Moreover, OPF solutions obtained from 30 algorithm runs were analyzed using the Wilcoxon statistical test method. Consequently, the present paper reports that the CSBO algorithm produces better-quality OPF solutions compared to its competitors and other literature studies.","PeriodicalId":23377,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Power Flow Analysis with Circulatory System-Based Optimization Algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Hüseyin BAKIR\",\"doi\":\"10.31127/tuje.1282429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Optimal power flow (OPF) is one of the most challenging optimization problems of power engineering. Owing to the high computational complexity of the OPF problem, a powerful and robust optimization algorithm is required to solve it. This paper has been centered on the optimization of OPF problem using circulatory system-based optimization (CSBO) algorithm. The solution quality of CSBO is compared with the recently introduced state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms i.e., artificial rabbits optimization (ARO), african vultures optimization algorithm (AVOA), and chaos game optimization (CGO). The practicability of the algorithms was evaluated on the IEEE-57 and 118-bus power networks for the optimization of various objectives, i.e., fuel cost, power loss, voltage deviation, and enhancement of voltage stability. Based on OPF results of the IEEE 57-bus power system, it is seen that the best fuel cost and voltage deviation results are calculated to be 41666.2344 $/h and 0.5871 p.u with the CSBO method. Given the OPF results of the IEEE 118-bus power network, it is observed that the CSBO algorithm presented the best fuel cost and active power loss values of 134934.3140 $/h, and 16.4688 MW. Moreover, OPF solutions obtained from 30 algorithm runs were analyzed using the Wilcoxon statistical test method. Consequently, the present paper reports that the CSBO algorithm produces better-quality OPF solutions compared to its competitors and other literature studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1282429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1282429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal Power Flow Analysis with Circulatory System-Based Optimization Algorithm
Optimal power flow (OPF) is one of the most challenging optimization problems of power engineering. Owing to the high computational complexity of the OPF problem, a powerful and robust optimization algorithm is required to solve it. This paper has been centered on the optimization of OPF problem using circulatory system-based optimization (CSBO) algorithm. The solution quality of CSBO is compared with the recently introduced state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms i.e., artificial rabbits optimization (ARO), african vultures optimization algorithm (AVOA), and chaos game optimization (CGO). The practicability of the algorithms was evaluated on the IEEE-57 and 118-bus power networks for the optimization of various objectives, i.e., fuel cost, power loss, voltage deviation, and enhancement of voltage stability. Based on OPF results of the IEEE 57-bus power system, it is seen that the best fuel cost and voltage deviation results are calculated to be 41666.2344 $/h and 0.5871 p.u with the CSBO method. Given the OPF results of the IEEE 118-bus power network, it is observed that the CSBO algorithm presented the best fuel cost and active power loss values of 134934.3140 $/h, and 16.4688 MW. Moreover, OPF solutions obtained from 30 algorithm runs were analyzed using the Wilcoxon statistical test method. Consequently, the present paper reports that the CSBO algorithm produces better-quality OPF solutions compared to its competitors and other literature studies.