1786年9月8日至10日荷兰海军访问瑟堡的文件

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY MARINERS MIRROR Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00253359.2023.2264658
Steve Fraser
{"title":"1786年9月8日至10日荷兰海军访问瑟堡的文件","authors":"Steve Fraser","doi":"10.1080/00253359.2023.2264658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis group of letters offers an insight into the value of the Franco-Dutch treaty of cooperation; although only half-finished, the new roadstead at Cherbourg was viewed as the basis of a new combined force able to challenge British hegemony in Channel waters.Key words: Franco-Dutch treatyCherbourgcrisis 1787French Channel port Notes1 Archives national, Paris: MAR D2 14, 426; and MAR D2 13, 4452 This is specified by Article IV of the treaty, ratified by the Dutch on 12 Dec and the French on 15 Dec. 1785, exchange made 20 Dec.3 Browning (ed.) Despatches from Paris, vol 1, 126.4 The rade at this point offered no protection from a westerly wind.5 The forts, and their armament, remained far from complete.6 Harcourt provides Melvill (Pieter baron Melvill van Carnbee, 1743–1826) with the approximately equivalent French title of chevalier.7 Harcourt is referring to the Fourth Anglo-Dutch war of 1780–84.8 Two redundant ships, the Triton (64), 1747, and the Brillant (64), 1774, were sent to Cherbourg to demonstrate the shelter provided by the breakwater and to be used as depots and barracks as required.9 Woensel uses the plural here to denote the whole of the plateau.10 This is now known as the passe Collignon. Its use was developed as a shortcut from the stone depot at Le Becquet to the breakwater site.11 Following the visit of the comte d’Artois, the king’s youngest brother, in May1786, the fort du Hommet was renamed in his honour.12 An N cardinal buoy still marks these rocks.13 This not entirely accurate idea dates back to Vauban’s Memoire sur les fortifications de Cherbourg of 1686.14 The descent of the English for a week in 1758 was another reason to fortify the rade at Cherbourg.15 This was repeatedly confirmed during the period of the breakwater’s construction, and nearly resulted in its cancellation as early as 1784.16 This is an exaggeration. A cone required around 30,000 cubic feet of timber, a frigate some 50,000 cubic feet.17 45,360 tonnes.18 A cone sunk and filled with stone cost around 300,000 livres tournois, or 15,000 pounds sterling.19 This is corroborated by the PS of Harcourt’s letter to Castries.20 Masonry was already recommended by Belidor in his Architecture hydraulique of 1753. There was much debate about how to complete the breakwater as it became apparent the cones were unable to resist wave action.21 The fort de Querqueville was still only a project at this point.22 The Service historique de la défense is today housed in this naval barracks.23 The site had been proposed as a harbour from the beginning of the eighteenth century, see Battesti, ‘Vauban thuriferaire de Cherbourg’, 75–96. Detailed plans were drawn up in 1778 by military engineers, see Service historique de la défense, Vincennes: 1VH 575.24 A recurrent myth of the period; this vantage point, the montagne du Roule, offers a fine view but only as far as the shipping lanes, less than halfway across the Channel.25 In 1789 La Bretonnière calculated there was still only room for 40 warships.26 The hosts have provided full details of their roles, although they might have mentioned that the inventor of the cones, Ponts et Chaussées engineer Louis-Alexandre de Cessart, was the director of the works at Cherbourg until 1791.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSteve FraserSteve Fraser retired as head of Classics at Thomas Hardye School, Dorchester Dorset in 2015, where he completed a book-length study of the history of the school and its founders, sections of which have won awards and been published in the Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society. For the last decade he has been researching the development of the port of Cherbourg and the construction of its breakwater; he has had several articles published in the Chronique d’histoire maritime in France, and is at present completing a book on the subject for publication next year. Steve, who lives in Weymouth, is a keen cross-Channel sailor and races regularly at Cherbourg with the Cherbourg Yacht Club while on research visits to the archives there.","PeriodicalId":44123,"journal":{"name":"MARINERS MIRROR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Documents Relating to the Official Dutch Naval Visit to Cherbourg, 8–10 September 1786\",\"authors\":\"Steve Fraser\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00253359.2023.2264658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis group of letters offers an insight into the value of the Franco-Dutch treaty of cooperation; although only half-finished, the new roadstead at Cherbourg was viewed as the basis of a new combined force able to challenge British hegemony in Channel waters.Key words: Franco-Dutch treatyCherbourgcrisis 1787French Channel port Notes1 Archives national, Paris: MAR D2 14, 426; and MAR D2 13, 4452 This is specified by Article IV of the treaty, ratified by the Dutch on 12 Dec and the French on 15 Dec. 1785, exchange made 20 Dec.3 Browning (ed.) Despatches from Paris, vol 1, 126.4 The rade at this point offered no protection from a westerly wind.5 The forts, and their armament, remained far from complete.6 Harcourt provides Melvill (Pieter baron Melvill van Carnbee, 1743–1826) with the approximately equivalent French title of chevalier.7 Harcourt is referring to the Fourth Anglo-Dutch war of 1780–84.8 Two redundant ships, the Triton (64), 1747, and the Brillant (64), 1774, were sent to Cherbourg to demonstrate the shelter provided by the breakwater and to be used as depots and barracks as required.9 Woensel uses the plural here to denote the whole of the plateau.10 This is now known as the passe Collignon. Its use was developed as a shortcut from the stone depot at Le Becquet to the breakwater site.11 Following the visit of the comte d’Artois, the king’s youngest brother, in May1786, the fort du Hommet was renamed in his honour.12 An N cardinal buoy still marks these rocks.13 This not entirely accurate idea dates back to Vauban’s Memoire sur les fortifications de Cherbourg of 1686.14 The descent of the English for a week in 1758 was another reason to fortify the rade at Cherbourg.15 This was repeatedly confirmed during the period of the breakwater’s construction, and nearly resulted in its cancellation as early as 1784.16 This is an exaggeration. A cone required around 30,000 cubic feet of timber, a frigate some 50,000 cubic feet.17 45,360 tonnes.18 A cone sunk and filled with stone cost around 300,000 livres tournois, or 15,000 pounds sterling.19 This is corroborated by the PS of Harcourt’s letter to Castries.20 Masonry was already recommended by Belidor in his Architecture hydraulique of 1753. There was much debate about how to complete the breakwater as it became apparent the cones were unable to resist wave action.21 The fort de Querqueville was still only a project at this point.22 The Service historique de la défense is today housed in this naval barracks.23 The site had been proposed as a harbour from the beginning of the eighteenth century, see Battesti, ‘Vauban thuriferaire de Cherbourg’, 75–96. Detailed plans were drawn up in 1778 by military engineers, see Service historique de la défense, Vincennes: 1VH 575.24 A recurrent myth of the period; this vantage point, the montagne du Roule, offers a fine view but only as far as the shipping lanes, less than halfway across the Channel.25 In 1789 La Bretonnière calculated there was still only room for 40 warships.26 The hosts have provided full details of their roles, although they might have mentioned that the inventor of the cones, Ponts et Chaussées engineer Louis-Alexandre de Cessart, was the director of the works at Cherbourg until 1791.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSteve FraserSteve Fraser retired as head of Classics at Thomas Hardye School, Dorchester Dorset in 2015, where he completed a book-length study of the history of the school and its founders, sections of which have won awards and been published in the Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society. For the last decade he has been researching the development of the port of Cherbourg and the construction of its breakwater; he has had several articles published in the Chronique d’histoire maritime in France, and is at present completing a book on the subject for publication next year. Steve, who lives in Weymouth, is a keen cross-Channel sailor and races regularly at Cherbourg with the Cherbourg Yacht Club while on research visits to the archives there.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MARINERS MIRROR\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MARINERS MIRROR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2023.2264658\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MARINERS MIRROR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2023.2264658","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[摘要]这组信件让我们对法荷合作条约的价值有了深刻的认识;虽然只完成了一半,但瑟堡的新基地被视为一支能够挑战英国在英吉利海峡水域霸权的新联合部队的基础。关键词:法荷条约;瑟堡危机;1787年法国海峡港口注1国家档案馆,巴黎:MAR D2 14,426;1785年12月12日,荷兰和法国分别在12月15日和12月20日批准了该条约,条约的第四条明确规定了这一点。3勃朗宁(编)《来自巴黎的电报》,第1卷,126.4这些堡垒及其武器装备还远远没有完成哈考特给梅尔维尔(Pieter baron Melvill van Carnbee, 1743-1826)提供了一个大致相当于法国骑士的头衔哈考特指的是1780 - 848年的第四次英荷战争。两艘多余的船,1747年的特里顿号(Triton)和1774年的布里兰特号(Brillant)被派往谢堡,以演示防波堤提供的庇护,并按要求用作仓库和兵营温塞尔在这里用复数表示整个高原这就是现在著名的柯利侬河。它的用途是从Le Becquet的石头仓库到防波堤的捷径1786年5月,国王最小的弟弟达图瓦伯爵来访后,霍梅特堡以他的名义重新命名在这些岩石上仍有一个N号浮标作标记这个不完全准确的想法可以追溯到1686.14年Vauban的Memoire sur les fortifications de Cherbourg。1758年英国人在一周内的下降是在Cherbourg加强贸易的另一个原因。15这在防波堤建造期间被反复证实,早在1784年就几乎导致了它的取消。一个圆锥体需要大约3万立方英尺的木材,一艘护卫舰需要大约5万立方英尺。17 45,360吨一个沉入海底并填满石头的圆锥体耗资约30万利弗尔(约合1.5万英镑)这一点在哈考特写给卡斯特里的信的附注中得到了证实。20在1753年的《水力建筑》一书中,贝利多已经推荐了砌筑。有很多关于如何完成防波堤的争论,因为很明显,圆锥体无法抵抗波浪的作用在这个时候,克尔克维尔堡还只是一个工程今天,德萨芬斯服役历史馆就设在这个海军军营里从18世纪初开始,这个地方就被提议作为一个港口,见Battesti, ' Vauban thuriferaire de Cherbourg ', 75-96。1778年,军事工程师制定了详细的计划,见文森斯:1VH 575.24那个时期反复出现的神话;这个有利位置,即鲁尔山,提供了一个很好的视野,但只能看到航道,不到海峡的一半。1789年,La bretonni计算出那里仍然只能容纳40艘战舰主持人提供了他们角色的全部细节,尽管他们可能会提到锥的发明者,Ponts et chauss工程师Louis-Alexandre de Cessart,直到1791年都是瑟堡的工程主管。2015年,史蒂夫·弗雷泽从多切斯特·多塞特的托马斯·哈代伊学院古典文学系主任的职位上退休,在那里,他完成了一本书长度的关于学校及其创始人历史的研究,其中的部分内容获得了奖项,并发表在《多塞特自然史和考古学会学报》上。在过去的十年里,他一直在研究瑟堡港的发展及其防波堤的建设;他在法国的《航海历史纪事》上发表了几篇文章,目前正在完成一本关于这一主题的书,将于明年出版。史蒂夫住在韦茅斯,是一名热衷于跨海峡的水手,他经常在瑟堡参加瑟堡游艇俱乐部的比赛,同时对那里的档案馆进行研究访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Documents Relating to the Official Dutch Naval Visit to Cherbourg, 8–10 September 1786
AbstractThis group of letters offers an insight into the value of the Franco-Dutch treaty of cooperation; although only half-finished, the new roadstead at Cherbourg was viewed as the basis of a new combined force able to challenge British hegemony in Channel waters.Key words: Franco-Dutch treatyCherbourgcrisis 1787French Channel port Notes1 Archives national, Paris: MAR D2 14, 426; and MAR D2 13, 4452 This is specified by Article IV of the treaty, ratified by the Dutch on 12 Dec and the French on 15 Dec. 1785, exchange made 20 Dec.3 Browning (ed.) Despatches from Paris, vol 1, 126.4 The rade at this point offered no protection from a westerly wind.5 The forts, and their armament, remained far from complete.6 Harcourt provides Melvill (Pieter baron Melvill van Carnbee, 1743–1826) with the approximately equivalent French title of chevalier.7 Harcourt is referring to the Fourth Anglo-Dutch war of 1780–84.8 Two redundant ships, the Triton (64), 1747, and the Brillant (64), 1774, were sent to Cherbourg to demonstrate the shelter provided by the breakwater and to be used as depots and barracks as required.9 Woensel uses the plural here to denote the whole of the plateau.10 This is now known as the passe Collignon. Its use was developed as a shortcut from the stone depot at Le Becquet to the breakwater site.11 Following the visit of the comte d’Artois, the king’s youngest brother, in May1786, the fort du Hommet was renamed in his honour.12 An N cardinal buoy still marks these rocks.13 This not entirely accurate idea dates back to Vauban’s Memoire sur les fortifications de Cherbourg of 1686.14 The descent of the English for a week in 1758 was another reason to fortify the rade at Cherbourg.15 This was repeatedly confirmed during the period of the breakwater’s construction, and nearly resulted in its cancellation as early as 1784.16 This is an exaggeration. A cone required around 30,000 cubic feet of timber, a frigate some 50,000 cubic feet.17 45,360 tonnes.18 A cone sunk and filled with stone cost around 300,000 livres tournois, or 15,000 pounds sterling.19 This is corroborated by the PS of Harcourt’s letter to Castries.20 Masonry was already recommended by Belidor in his Architecture hydraulique of 1753. There was much debate about how to complete the breakwater as it became apparent the cones were unable to resist wave action.21 The fort de Querqueville was still only a project at this point.22 The Service historique de la défense is today housed in this naval barracks.23 The site had been proposed as a harbour from the beginning of the eighteenth century, see Battesti, ‘Vauban thuriferaire de Cherbourg’, 75–96. Detailed plans were drawn up in 1778 by military engineers, see Service historique de la défense, Vincennes: 1VH 575.24 A recurrent myth of the period; this vantage point, the montagne du Roule, offers a fine view but only as far as the shipping lanes, less than halfway across the Channel.25 In 1789 La Bretonnière calculated there was still only room for 40 warships.26 The hosts have provided full details of their roles, although they might have mentioned that the inventor of the cones, Ponts et Chaussées engineer Louis-Alexandre de Cessart, was the director of the works at Cherbourg until 1791.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSteve FraserSteve Fraser retired as head of Classics at Thomas Hardye School, Dorchester Dorset in 2015, where he completed a book-length study of the history of the school and its founders, sections of which have won awards and been published in the Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society. For the last decade he has been researching the development of the port of Cherbourg and the construction of its breakwater; he has had several articles published in the Chronique d’histoire maritime in France, and is at present completing a book on the subject for publication next year. Steve, who lives in Weymouth, is a keen cross-Channel sailor and races regularly at Cherbourg with the Cherbourg Yacht Club while on research visits to the archives there.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MARINERS MIRROR
MARINERS MIRROR HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The Society’s quarterly journal, The Mariner"s Mirror, is internationally recognised as the pre-eminent English-language journal on naval and maritime history, nautical archaeology and all aspects of seafaring and lore of the sea. It covers a wide range of history, from Bronze Age ships to nuclear submarines, and nautical matters such as hydography, navigation and naval logistics. The Mariner’s Mirror has an extensive book review section. Its notes and queries sections and correspondence pages provide a channel for a lively exchange between members.
期刊最新文献
The Petrol Navy: British, American and other motor boats at war 1914–1920 The Petrol Navy: British, American and other motor boats at war 1914–1920 , by S. R. Dunn, Seaforth Publishing, 2023, £25 (hb), 320 pages, illustrations, ISBN 9781399062855 The Myth of HMS Minden and ‘The Star-Spangled Banner’: Where did it originate? A Jacobean Draught of an 18-gun Ship in the Danish National Archives Drawn by Phineas Pett Under Five Flags: Miguirditch Gumuchdjian, an Armenian shipowner of Constantinople and London 1900–1932 Documents Relating to the Official Dutch Naval Visit to Cherbourg, 8–10 September 1786
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1