优质的“在线”教师——远程教育中学生对教师的欣赏和重视是什么?

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogika-Pedagogy Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.53656/ped2023-8.3
Irena Golubović-Ilić, Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Nataša Vukićević
{"title":"优质的“在线”教师——远程教育中学生对教师的欣赏和重视是什么?","authors":"Irena Golubović-Ilić, Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Nataša Vukićević","doi":"10.53656/ped2023-8.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the research was to determine what students praise and value about university teachers during distance learning, i.e. what qualities, according to students, characterize effective online teachers. By combining a quantitative and qualitative approach to research, we determined which teachers’ qualities students highlighted as positive, examined the shortcomings in the work of teachers that students noticed in certain academic subjects, and determined differences in the evaluation of the quality of teacher work in relation to the level of study. The research included a total of 965 students, of which 674 were undergraduate students and 291 were students in master’s academic studies. The paper used a descriptive-analytical method, a survey technique and a questionnaire for student evaluation of the quality of the teacher’s work. The results of the research showed that students of both study levels during distance learning positively value the ways teachers treat them – appreciation, respect, understanding, investing extra effort when explaining content, fairness, correctness and a positive atmosphere in classes. In addition, students in master’s studies especially appreciate discussion that enables them to discuss certain topics and give different opinions in class. Despite certain limitations of the study, the results overall suggest that students value and rank certain characteristics of teachers in an almost identical way regardless of whether it is an online or a face-to-face class.","PeriodicalId":44645,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogika-Pedagogy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Quality “Online” Teacher – What Do Students Appreciate and Value in Teachers during Distance Learning?\",\"authors\":\"Irena Golubović-Ilić, Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Nataša Vukićević\",\"doi\":\"10.53656/ped2023-8.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of the research was to determine what students praise and value about university teachers during distance learning, i.e. what qualities, according to students, characterize effective online teachers. By combining a quantitative and qualitative approach to research, we determined which teachers’ qualities students highlighted as positive, examined the shortcomings in the work of teachers that students noticed in certain academic subjects, and determined differences in the evaluation of the quality of teacher work in relation to the level of study. The research included a total of 965 students, of which 674 were undergraduate students and 291 were students in master’s academic studies. The paper used a descriptive-analytical method, a survey technique and a questionnaire for student evaluation of the quality of the teacher’s work. The results of the research showed that students of both study levels during distance learning positively value the ways teachers treat them – appreciation, respect, understanding, investing extra effort when explaining content, fairness, correctness and a positive atmosphere in classes. In addition, students in master’s studies especially appreciate discussion that enables them to discuss certain topics and give different opinions in class. Despite certain limitations of the study, the results overall suggest that students value and rank certain characteristics of teachers in an almost identical way regardless of whether it is an online or a face-to-face class.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogika-Pedagogy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogika-Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2023-8.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogika-Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2023-8.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定学生在远程学习过程中对大学教师的评价和价值,即根据学生的看法,有效的在线教师的特点是什么。通过结合定量和定性的研究方法,我们确定了学生认为积极的教师素质,检查了学生在某些学术科目中注意到的教师工作中的缺点,并确定了与学习水平相关的教师工作质量评价的差异。该研究共包括965名学生,其中本科生674名,硕士研究生291名。本文采用描述分析法、调查法和问卷法对学生对教师工作质量的评价进行了研究。研究结果表明,在远程学习中,两种学习水平的学生都积极评价教师对待他们的方式——欣赏、尊重、理解、在解释内容时付出额外的努力、公平、正确和课堂上的积极氛围。此外,硕士学生特别喜欢讨论,这使他们能够在课堂上讨论某些话题并发表不同的意见。尽管这项研究有一定的局限性,但总的来说,结果表明,无论是在线课程还是面对面课程,学生对教师的某些特征的评价和排名几乎是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Quality “Online” Teacher – What Do Students Appreciate and Value in Teachers during Distance Learning?
The goal of the research was to determine what students praise and value about university teachers during distance learning, i.e. what qualities, according to students, characterize effective online teachers. By combining a quantitative and qualitative approach to research, we determined which teachers’ qualities students highlighted as positive, examined the shortcomings in the work of teachers that students noticed in certain academic subjects, and determined differences in the evaluation of the quality of teacher work in relation to the level of study. The research included a total of 965 students, of which 674 were undergraduate students and 291 were students in master’s academic studies. The paper used a descriptive-analytical method, a survey technique and a questionnaire for student evaluation of the quality of the teacher’s work. The results of the research showed that students of both study levels during distance learning positively value the ways teachers treat them – appreciation, respect, understanding, investing extra effort when explaining content, fairness, correctness and a positive atmosphere in classes. In addition, students in master’s studies especially appreciate discussion that enables them to discuss certain topics and give different opinions in class. Despite certain limitations of the study, the results overall suggest that students value and rank certain characteristics of teachers in an almost identical way regardless of whether it is an online or a face-to-face class.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogika-Pedagogy
Pedagogika-Pedagogy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges to Entrepreneurship Education in High School. Interaction between Formal and Informal Assessment Designing a University Environment for Inclusive Digital Education – Methods and Approaches The Problem with Penmanship in the Bulgarian Education System Free Online Resources in Teaching Mathematics The Stereotypes of Pedagogical Students – Barriers to the Implementation of Quality Inclusive Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1