基于时频分析和深度学习的LPI雷达分类技术的时间和精度权衡

Junsang Yoo, Yun Suk Cho, Chang-Joo Kim, Heeyul Choi, Youngsik Kim
{"title":"基于时频分析和深度学习的LPI雷达分类技术的时间和精度权衡","authors":"Junsang Yoo, Yun Suk Cho, Chang-Joo Kim, Heeyul Choi, Youngsik Kim","doi":"10.5515/kjkiees.2022.34.1.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technology for classifying low probability of intercept (LPI) radar signals with speed and accuracy is critical for cognitive communication research. We used time-frequency analysis (TFA) and deep learning to classify 12 typical LPI radar signals. Traditional methods use the Choi-Williams distribution (CWD), which requires more than 500 times longer TFA generation time than the spectrogram method. In this paper, we show the trade-off relationship between classification accuracy and detection time using a spectrogram, Wigner-Ville distribution (WVD), and CWD as the training datasets. As a result, the CWD model showed higher accuracy than the spectrogram model, but the prediction time was more than 200 times longer. The accuracy difference was only 1 %p for an SNR over −2 dB, but it reached 7.5%p for an SNR of −10 dB. Therefore, a lower SNR shows a distinct trade-off between prediction time and accuracy, depending on the type of TFA.","PeriodicalId":55817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time and Accuracy Trade-Off of LPI Radar Classification Technology Based on Time-Frequency Analysis and Deep Learning\",\"authors\":\"Junsang Yoo, Yun Suk Cho, Chang-Joo Kim, Heeyul Choi, Youngsik Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.5515/kjkiees.2022.34.1.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technology for classifying low probability of intercept (LPI) radar signals with speed and accuracy is critical for cognitive communication research. We used time-frequency analysis (TFA) and deep learning to classify 12 typical LPI radar signals. Traditional methods use the Choi-Williams distribution (CWD), which requires more than 500 times longer TFA generation time than the spectrogram method. In this paper, we show the trade-off relationship between classification accuracy and detection time using a spectrogram, Wigner-Ville distribution (WVD), and CWD as the training datasets. As a result, the CWD model showed higher accuracy than the spectrogram model, but the prediction time was more than 200 times longer. The accuracy difference was only 1 %p for an SNR over −2 dB, but it reached 7.5%p for an SNR of −10 dB. Therefore, a lower SNR shows a distinct trade-off between prediction time and accuracy, depending on the type of TFA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5515/kjkiees.2022.34.1.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5515/kjkiees.2022.34.1.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速准确地对低截获概率雷达信号进行分类是认知通信研究的关键。我们使用时频分析(TFA)和深度学习对12个典型的LPI雷达信号进行分类。传统方法使用Choi-Williams分布(CWD),其TFA生成时间比谱图方法长500倍以上。本文使用谱图、Wigner-Ville分布(WVD)和CWD作为训练数据集,展示了分类精度和检测时间之间的权衡关系。结果表明,CWD模型比谱图模型精度更高,但预测时间要长200倍以上。当信噪比大于- 2 dB时,准确度差仅为1% p,但当信噪比为- 10 dB时,准确度差达到7.5%p。因此,较低的信噪比显示了预测时间和准确性之间的明显权衡,这取决于TFA的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time and Accuracy Trade-Off of LPI Radar Classification Technology Based on Time-Frequency Analysis and Deep Learning
Technology for classifying low probability of intercept (LPI) radar signals with speed and accuracy is critical for cognitive communication research. We used time-frequency analysis (TFA) and deep learning to classify 12 typical LPI radar signals. Traditional methods use the Choi-Williams distribution (CWD), which requires more than 500 times longer TFA generation time than the spectrogram method. In this paper, we show the trade-off relationship between classification accuracy and detection time using a spectrogram, Wigner-Ville distribution (WVD), and CWD as the training datasets. As a result, the CWD model showed higher accuracy than the spectrogram model, but the prediction time was more than 200 times longer. The accuracy difference was only 1 %p for an SNR over −2 dB, but it reached 7.5%p for an SNR of −10 dB. Therefore, a lower SNR shows a distinct trade-off between prediction time and accuracy, depending on the type of TFA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
W-Band CMOS Wilkinson Power Divider Application of the Reaction Theorem to Calculate the Coupling between Array Antennas on an Integrated Mast Experimental Study of Active EMI Filters for the Reduction of EMI Passive Elements in SMPS for TV Power IFF Function Design and Mode 5 AIMS Certification Test for CSR-II High-Speed Target Velocity Compensation and Detection/Tracking Algorithm to Improve Detection/Tracking Accuracy for Active Protection System Radar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1