Luis Felipe Giesteira, Thiago Caliari, Patrícia de Oliveira Matos
{"title":"工业基础和国防部门系统概念要素和测量建议","authors":"Luis Felipe Giesteira, Thiago Caliari, Patrícia de Oliveira Matos","doi":"10.21544/2359-3075.29230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work seeks to define conceptual elements between the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) and the Sectoral Innovation System (SIS) to formulate a measurement proposal for the DIB in the Brazilian case. Considering this theoretical framework and national specificities, a methodology is developed for assessing three demand components: internal, external, and R&D. For the time period between 2007 and 2020, it is observed that the Brazilian DIB grew from R$ 1 billion in 2007 to R$ 3 billion in 2012, maintaining a stable pattern from there onwards. While the primary component of the DIB is defense R&D, this growth was influenced by increased purchases of medium-high and high-technology-intensive goods, driven by strategic defense projects defined in the National Defense Strategy (END), which did not persist in the following years. It is important to increase defense R&D and exports in different years to maintain the total value of the DIB. Finally, a comparison between what is referred to as the “revealed DIB” (the measured DIB) and the total defense production capacity (generalized DIB) is suggested, revealing findings such as (i) a reflection of the deindustrialization process with a decrease in the share of higher-technology-intensive products, and (ii) the possible limited scope of the procurement policy through the revealed DIB due to the reduction in the measured productive capacity in the generalized DIB.","PeriodicalId":52743,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Base industrial e sistema setorial de defesa elementos conceituais e proposta de mensuração\",\"authors\":\"Luis Felipe Giesteira, Thiago Caliari, Patrícia de Oliveira Matos\",\"doi\":\"10.21544/2359-3075.29230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work seeks to define conceptual elements between the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) and the Sectoral Innovation System (SIS) to formulate a measurement proposal for the DIB in the Brazilian case. Considering this theoretical framework and national specificities, a methodology is developed for assessing three demand components: internal, external, and R&D. For the time period between 2007 and 2020, it is observed that the Brazilian DIB grew from R$ 1 billion in 2007 to R$ 3 billion in 2012, maintaining a stable pattern from there onwards. While the primary component of the DIB is defense R&D, this growth was influenced by increased purchases of medium-high and high-technology-intensive goods, driven by strategic defense projects defined in the National Defense Strategy (END), which did not persist in the following years. It is important to increase defense R&D and exports in different years to maintain the total value of the DIB. Finally, a comparison between what is referred to as the “revealed DIB” (the measured DIB) and the total defense production capacity (generalized DIB) is suggested, revealing findings such as (i) a reflection of the deindustrialization process with a decrease in the share of higher-technology-intensive products, and (ii) the possible limited scope of the procurement policy through the revealed DIB due to the reduction in the measured productive capacity in the generalized DIB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21544/2359-3075.29230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21544/2359-3075.29230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Base industrial e sistema setorial de defesa elementos conceituais e proposta de mensuração
This work seeks to define conceptual elements between the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) and the Sectoral Innovation System (SIS) to formulate a measurement proposal for the DIB in the Brazilian case. Considering this theoretical framework and national specificities, a methodology is developed for assessing three demand components: internal, external, and R&D. For the time period between 2007 and 2020, it is observed that the Brazilian DIB grew from R$ 1 billion in 2007 to R$ 3 billion in 2012, maintaining a stable pattern from there onwards. While the primary component of the DIB is defense R&D, this growth was influenced by increased purchases of medium-high and high-technology-intensive goods, driven by strategic defense projects defined in the National Defense Strategy (END), which did not persist in the following years. It is important to increase defense R&D and exports in different years to maintain the total value of the DIB. Finally, a comparison between what is referred to as the “revealed DIB” (the measured DIB) and the total defense production capacity (generalized DIB) is suggested, revealing findings such as (i) a reflection of the deindustrialization process with a decrease in the share of higher-technology-intensive products, and (ii) the possible limited scope of the procurement policy through the revealed DIB due to the reduction in the measured productive capacity in the generalized DIB.