性别与世代:土地所有权与年长印度人的自治权

IF 3.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Feminist Economics Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1080/13545701.2023.2255878
Hope Xu Yan, Sonalde Desai, Debasis Barik
{"title":"性别与世代:土地所有权与年长印度人的自治权","authors":"Hope Xu Yan, Sonalde Desai, Debasis Barik","doi":"10.1080/13545701.2023.2255878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractWhile increased access to household assets has been shown to improve older individuals’ autonomy and bargaining power at home, the role of gender hierarchy in shaping differential impacts of household assets has received far less attention. This article explores the gender asymmetry in the association of older people’s (age 60 years or more) decision-making power at home and survival probability with their ownership of and managerial control over agricultural land in rural India. Using data from the India Human Development Survey, results find that in multi-generational households, landownership at the household level is associated with higher decision-making power and survival probability for older men but not for older women. Among older women, the relationship between household landownership and decision-making power is positive when they have clearly established titles to the land or managerial control but negative when their names are not on the land title.HIGHLIGHTS Landownership is an important source of old age security in India.Agricultural land in India is typically controlled by the patriarch; women rarely own or control household land.The generational power conferred on older men with landownership does not apply to older women to the same degree.It is crucial to register household land under women’s names and recognize women as actual landowners.KEYWORDS: Landownershipgender inequalityolder Indiansdecision-making powermortalityJEL Codes: J16J14Q15 Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [grant number INV-003352]; Foundation for the National Institutes of Health [grant number R01HD041455]; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation [grant number 2018–7924].Notes on contributorsHope Xu YanHope Xu Yan is a PhD Candidate in Sociology at the University of Maryland, College Park and Graduate Research Assistant of the India Human Development Survey. Yan holds a MSc in Gender and a MA in Sociology.Sonalde DesaiSonalde Desai is Professor of Sociology at the University of Maryland, College Park with a joint appointment as Professor and Centre Director, NCAER National Data Innovation Centre, New Delhi. Desai holds a PhD in Sociology and is a social demographer by training.Debasis BarikDebasis Barik is Fellow at the National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi. Barik holds a PhD in Population Studies and is a demographer by training. His research focuses around the issues of gender, health inequality, and social demography.","PeriodicalId":47715,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Economics","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender and Generation: Landownership and Older Indians’ Autonomy\",\"authors\":\"Hope Xu Yan, Sonalde Desai, Debasis Barik\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13545701.2023.2255878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractWhile increased access to household assets has been shown to improve older individuals’ autonomy and bargaining power at home, the role of gender hierarchy in shaping differential impacts of household assets has received far less attention. This article explores the gender asymmetry in the association of older people’s (age 60 years or more) decision-making power at home and survival probability with their ownership of and managerial control over agricultural land in rural India. Using data from the India Human Development Survey, results find that in multi-generational households, landownership at the household level is associated with higher decision-making power and survival probability for older men but not for older women. Among older women, the relationship between household landownership and decision-making power is positive when they have clearly established titles to the land or managerial control but negative when their names are not on the land title.HIGHLIGHTS Landownership is an important source of old age security in India.Agricultural land in India is typically controlled by the patriarch; women rarely own or control household land.The generational power conferred on older men with landownership does not apply to older women to the same degree.It is crucial to register household land under women’s names and recognize women as actual landowners.KEYWORDS: Landownershipgender inequalityolder Indiansdecision-making powermortalityJEL Codes: J16J14Q15 Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [grant number INV-003352]; Foundation for the National Institutes of Health [grant number R01HD041455]; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation [grant number 2018–7924].Notes on contributorsHope Xu YanHope Xu Yan is a PhD Candidate in Sociology at the University of Maryland, College Park and Graduate Research Assistant of the India Human Development Survey. Yan holds a MSc in Gender and a MA in Sociology.Sonalde DesaiSonalde Desai is Professor of Sociology at the University of Maryland, College Park with a joint appointment as Professor and Centre Director, NCAER National Data Innovation Centre, New Delhi. Desai holds a PhD in Sociology and is a social demographer by training.Debasis BarikDebasis Barik is Fellow at the National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi. Barik holds a PhD in Population Studies and is a demographer by training. His research focuses around the issues of gender, health inequality, and social demography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Economics\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2023.2255878\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2023.2255878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要虽然越来越多的家庭资产被证明可以提高老年人在家庭中的自主性和议价能力,但性别等级在形成家庭资产差异影响中的作用却很少受到关注。本文探讨了印度农村老年人(60岁或以上)家庭决策权和生存概率与他们对农业用地的所有权和管理控制权之间的性别不对称关系。利用印度人类发展调查的数据,结果发现,在多代家庭中,家庭层面的土地所有权与老年男性更高的决策权和生存概率有关,而与老年女性无关。在老年妇女中,如果她们对土地有明确的所有权或管理控制权,家庭土地所有权与决策权之间的关系是积极的,但如果她们的名字不在土地所有权上,则是消极的。在印度,土地所有权是养老保障的重要来源。印度的农业用地通常由族长控制;妇女很少拥有或控制家庭土地。赋予拥有土地所有权的年长男性的代际权力在同样程度上并不适用于年长女性。将家庭土地登记在妇女名下并承认妇女为实际土地所有人是至关重要的。关键词:土地所有权;性别不平等;印度老年人;决策权;美国国立卫生研究院基金会[拨款号R01HD041455];威廉和弗洛拉休利特基金会[批准号2018-7924]。作者许燕(音译)是马里兰大学帕克分校社会学博士研究生,也是印度人类发展调查的研究生研究助理。她拥有性别硕士学位和社会学硕士学位。Sonalde Desai是马里兰大学帕克分校的社会学教授,同时担任新德里NCAER国家数据创新中心的教授和中心主任。德赛拥有社会学博士学位,是一名训练有素的社会人口学家。Debasis Barik是新德里国家应用经济研究委员会研究员。巴里克拥有人口研究博士学位,是一名训练有素的人口统计学家。他的研究重点是性别、健康不平等和社会人口问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender and Generation: Landownership and Older Indians’ Autonomy
AbstractWhile increased access to household assets has been shown to improve older individuals’ autonomy and bargaining power at home, the role of gender hierarchy in shaping differential impacts of household assets has received far less attention. This article explores the gender asymmetry in the association of older people’s (age 60 years or more) decision-making power at home and survival probability with their ownership of and managerial control over agricultural land in rural India. Using data from the India Human Development Survey, results find that in multi-generational households, landownership at the household level is associated with higher decision-making power and survival probability for older men but not for older women. Among older women, the relationship between household landownership and decision-making power is positive when they have clearly established titles to the land or managerial control but negative when their names are not on the land title.HIGHLIGHTS Landownership is an important source of old age security in India.Agricultural land in India is typically controlled by the patriarch; women rarely own or control household land.The generational power conferred on older men with landownership does not apply to older women to the same degree.It is crucial to register household land under women’s names and recognize women as actual landowners.KEYWORDS: Landownershipgender inequalityolder Indiansdecision-making powermortalityJEL Codes: J16J14Q15 Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [grant number INV-003352]; Foundation for the National Institutes of Health [grant number R01HD041455]; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation [grant number 2018–7924].Notes on contributorsHope Xu YanHope Xu Yan is a PhD Candidate in Sociology at the University of Maryland, College Park and Graduate Research Assistant of the India Human Development Survey. Yan holds a MSc in Gender and a MA in Sociology.Sonalde DesaiSonalde Desai is Professor of Sociology at the University of Maryland, College Park with a joint appointment as Professor and Centre Director, NCAER National Data Innovation Centre, New Delhi. Desai holds a PhD in Sociology and is a social demographer by training.Debasis BarikDebasis Barik is Fellow at the National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi. Barik holds a PhD in Population Studies and is a demographer by training. His research focuses around the issues of gender, health inequality, and social demography.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Economics
Feminist Economics Multiple-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Feminist Economics is a peer-reviewed journal that provides an open forum for dialogue and debate about feminist economic perspectives. By opening new areas of economic inquiry, welcoming diverse voices, and encouraging critical exchanges, the journal enlarges and enriches economic discourse. The goal of Feminist Economics is not just to develop more illuminating theories but to improve the conditions of living for all children, women, and men. Feminist Economics: -Advances feminist inquiry into economic issues affecting the lives of children, women, and men -Examines the relationship between gender and power in the economy and the construction and legitimization of economic knowledge -Extends feminist theoretical, historical, and methodological contributions to economics and the economy -Offers feminist insights into the underlying constructs of the economics discipline and into the historical, political, and cultural context of economic knowledge -Provides a feminist rethinking of theory and policy in diverse fields, including those not directly related to gender -Stimulates discussions among diverse scholars worldwide and from a broad spectrum of intellectual traditions, welcoming cross-disciplinary and cross-country perspectives, especially from countries in the South
期刊最新文献
Dispossession after War: A Feminist Political Economy Perspective Analysis of Seasonal Time Poverty and Aspirations in the Upper East Region of Ghana The Value of Work: The Gendered Outcomes of Organizational Wage Reforms Feminist Ideologies at Work: Culture, Collectivism, and Entrepreneurship among Disadvantaged Women in India Women’s Colleges and Economics Major Choice: Evidence from Wellesley College Applicants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1