{"title":"混合式学习对学生学习绩效的影响:meta分析","authors":"Qing Yu, Kun Yu, Baomin Li, Qiyun Wang","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2264984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBlended learning (BL) has become a significant way to promote education reform and development. However, the effectiveness of BL on students’ learning is questioned, and some pedagogy and course design issues also need to be clarified. This meta-analysis investigated the effects of BL while also examining whether eleven moderators would affect BL’s effects. A total of 133 empirical studies consisting of 18,464 participants were identified. The results showed that BL had an upper-medium effect on students’ learning performance (Hedges’ g = 0.651, p < 0.001). Further, moderator analyses showed that the teaching method, proportion of online learning, type of online interaction, region, and publication year had moderating effects. These new findings can improve BL. Finally, the impacts of BL and moderators were discussed, and the implications, limitations, and future directions were provided.Keywords: Blended learningonline learninglearning performancemeta-analysis AcknowledgementsThanks to Dr. Yu Li for her suggestions on this article. We are very grateful to the editors and three reviewers for their useful and constructive comments on our work.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData will be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by grants from the National Education Sciences Planning General Project: Construction and Application Research of Human-Computer Collaborative Diagnostic Model for Classroom Teaching Video Analysis [grant number BHA230123].Notes on contributorsQing YuQing Yu is a PhD student at the Institute of Higher Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include AI in education, blended learning, teacher education, technology-enhanced learning, family education, educational management, and student learning and development.Kun YuKun Yu is a graduate student at the School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include computer-assisted learning, online learning, family education, and student learning and development.Baomin LiBaomin Li is a Professor at the Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. Her research interests include intelligent education, teacher education and professional development, classroom teaching research, blended learning, and online education.Qiyun WangQiyun Wang is an Associate Professor at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. His research interests include blended synchronous learning, online learning, technology-supported learning environment, and education design-based research.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of blended learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Qing Yu, Kun Yu, Baomin Li, Qiyun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15391523.2023.2264984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractBlended learning (BL) has become a significant way to promote education reform and development. However, the effectiveness of BL on students’ learning is questioned, and some pedagogy and course design issues also need to be clarified. This meta-analysis investigated the effects of BL while also examining whether eleven moderators would affect BL’s effects. A total of 133 empirical studies consisting of 18,464 participants were identified. The results showed that BL had an upper-medium effect on students’ learning performance (Hedges’ g = 0.651, p < 0.001). Further, moderator analyses showed that the teaching method, proportion of online learning, type of online interaction, region, and publication year had moderating effects. These new findings can improve BL. Finally, the impacts of BL and moderators were discussed, and the implications, limitations, and future directions were provided.Keywords: Blended learningonline learninglearning performancemeta-analysis AcknowledgementsThanks to Dr. Yu Li for her suggestions on this article. We are very grateful to the editors and three reviewers for their useful and constructive comments on our work.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData will be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by grants from the National Education Sciences Planning General Project: Construction and Application Research of Human-Computer Collaborative Diagnostic Model for Classroom Teaching Video Analysis [grant number BHA230123].Notes on contributorsQing YuQing Yu is a PhD student at the Institute of Higher Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include AI in education, blended learning, teacher education, technology-enhanced learning, family education, educational management, and student learning and development.Kun YuKun Yu is a graduate student at the School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include computer-assisted learning, online learning, family education, and student learning and development.Baomin LiBaomin Li is a Professor at the Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. Her research interests include intelligent education, teacher education and professional development, classroom teaching research, blended learning, and online education.Qiyun WangQiyun Wang is an Associate Professor at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. His research interests include blended synchronous learning, online learning, technology-supported learning environment, and education design-based research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Technology in Education\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Technology in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264984\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264984","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
摘要混合式学习已成为推动教育改革与发展的重要途径。然而,BL对学生学习的有效性受到质疑,一些教学法和课程设计问题也需要澄清。本荟萃分析调查了BL的效果,同时也检验了11个调节因子是否会影响BL的效果。共有133项实证研究,涉及18464名参与者。结果显示,BL对学生学习成绩有中上效应(Hedges’g = 0.651, p < 0.001)。此外,调节分析显示,教学方法、在线学习比例、在线互动类型、地区和出版年份具有调节作用。这些新发现有助于改善基础知识。最后,讨论了基础知识和调节因子的影响,并提出了今后的研究方向。关键词:混合式学习在线学习学习绩效meta-分析感谢李宇博士对本文提出的建议。我们非常感谢编辑和三位审稿人对我们的工作提出的有用和建设性的意见。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明如有合理要求,通讯作者将提供数据。本研究由国家教育科学规划总体项目:课堂教学视频分析人机协同诊断模型的构建与应用研究[批准号:BHA230123]资助。作者简介:qing Yu,中国上海复旦大学高等教育学院博士生。他的研究兴趣包括教育中的人工智能、混合式学习、教师教育、技术增强学习、家庭教育、教育管理和学生学习与发展。俞坤,中国上海复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院研究生。他的研究兴趣包括计算机辅助学习、在线学习、家庭教育和学生学习与发展。李保民,华东师范大学教育学院教授。她的研究兴趣包括智能教育、教师教育和专业发展、课堂教学研究、混合式学习和在线教育。王启云,新加坡南洋理工大学国立教育研究院副教授。他的研究兴趣包括混合同步学习、在线学习、技术支持的学习环境和基于教育设计的研究。
Effectiveness of blended learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis
AbstractBlended learning (BL) has become a significant way to promote education reform and development. However, the effectiveness of BL on students’ learning is questioned, and some pedagogy and course design issues also need to be clarified. This meta-analysis investigated the effects of BL while also examining whether eleven moderators would affect BL’s effects. A total of 133 empirical studies consisting of 18,464 participants were identified. The results showed that BL had an upper-medium effect on students’ learning performance (Hedges’ g = 0.651, p < 0.001). Further, moderator analyses showed that the teaching method, proportion of online learning, type of online interaction, region, and publication year had moderating effects. These new findings can improve BL. Finally, the impacts of BL and moderators were discussed, and the implications, limitations, and future directions were provided.Keywords: Blended learningonline learninglearning performancemeta-analysis AcknowledgementsThanks to Dr. Yu Li for her suggestions on this article. We are very grateful to the editors and three reviewers for their useful and constructive comments on our work.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData will be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by grants from the National Education Sciences Planning General Project: Construction and Application Research of Human-Computer Collaborative Diagnostic Model for Classroom Teaching Video Analysis [grant number BHA230123].Notes on contributorsQing YuQing Yu is a PhD student at the Institute of Higher Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include AI in education, blended learning, teacher education, technology-enhanced learning, family education, educational management, and student learning and development.Kun YuKun Yu is a graduate student at the School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include computer-assisted learning, online learning, family education, and student learning and development.Baomin LiBaomin Li is a Professor at the Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. Her research interests include intelligent education, teacher education and professional development, classroom teaching research, blended learning, and online education.Qiyun WangQiyun Wang is an Associate Professor at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. His research interests include blended synchronous learning, online learning, technology-supported learning environment, and education design-based research.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Research on Technology in Education (JRTE) is a premier source for high-quality, peer-reviewed research that defines the state of the art, and future horizons, of teaching and learning with technology. The terms "education" and "technology" are broadly defined. Education is inclusive of formal educational environments ranging from PK-12 to higher education, and informal learning environments, such as museums, community centers, and after-school programs. Technology refers to both software and hardware innovations, and more broadly, the application of technological processes to education.