基于信仰的组织与扶贫:定义和术语的范围审查(2010-2021)

Sarah Maes, M. Schrooten, P. Raeymaeckers, B. Broeckaert
{"title":"基于信仰的组织与扶贫:定义和术语的范围审查(2010-2021)","authors":"Sarah Maes, M. Schrooten, P. Raeymaeckers, B. Broeckaert","doi":"10.1080/15426432.2023.2270930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn this paper, we present the results of a scoping review in which we examined the scientific literature (2010–2021) on faith-based organizations (FBOs) working within the field of poverty alleviation, focusing on the way studies define and use the term FBO. Fifty-two relevant studies were identified and included. Our research shows that the term FBOs is primarily used in American studies. Moreover, there is no broad consensus on the exact definition or meaning of the term nor on its scope. Because of this lack of consensus and the inherent shortcomings of the term, we suggest to replace the term FBO by the term “religion-based solidarity initiatives” (RSIs), We define RSIs as: “Initiatives that, from a religious inspiration, aim at organizing collective action for and/or providing support or services to people in vulnerable positions.” These initiatives can range from small scale ad hoc initiatives till large scale formal organizations.KEYWORDS: Faith-based organizationsdefinitionpovertysolidarityreligion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. We left out the five articles that are literature reviews from the table.2. When the definition of specific author(s) is used more than once, we give the complete the first time it appears in the table; on subsequent occasions we mention the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis scoping review is part of the SOLIGION project (2021–2024) funded by the FWO project number: S006621N","PeriodicalId":45302,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIAL WORK","volume":"59 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faith-based organizations and poverty alleviation: a scoping review on definitions and terminology (2010–2021)\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Maes, M. Schrooten, P. Raeymaeckers, B. Broeckaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15426432.2023.2270930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTIn this paper, we present the results of a scoping review in which we examined the scientific literature (2010–2021) on faith-based organizations (FBOs) working within the field of poverty alleviation, focusing on the way studies define and use the term FBO. Fifty-two relevant studies were identified and included. Our research shows that the term FBOs is primarily used in American studies. Moreover, there is no broad consensus on the exact definition or meaning of the term nor on its scope. Because of this lack of consensus and the inherent shortcomings of the term, we suggest to replace the term FBO by the term “religion-based solidarity initiatives” (RSIs), We define RSIs as: “Initiatives that, from a religious inspiration, aim at organizing collective action for and/or providing support or services to people in vulnerable positions.” These initiatives can range from small scale ad hoc initiatives till large scale formal organizations.KEYWORDS: Faith-based organizationsdefinitionpovertysolidarityreligion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. We left out the five articles that are literature reviews from the table.2. When the definition of specific author(s) is used more than once, we give the complete the first time it appears in the table; on subsequent occasions we mention the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis scoping review is part of the SOLIGION project (2021–2024) funded by the FWO project number: S006621N\",\"PeriodicalId\":45302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIAL WORK\",\"volume\":\"59 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIAL WORK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2023.2270930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIAL WORK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2023.2270930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们对2010-2021年在扶贫领域工作的基于信仰的组织(FBO)的科学文献进行了范围审查,重点研究了FBO一词的定义和使用方式。确定并纳入了52项相关研究。我们的研究表明,fbo一词主要用于美国研究。此外,对该术语的确切定义或含义及其范围也没有广泛的共识。由于缺乏共识和这个术语的固有缺陷,我们建议用“基于宗教的团结倡议”(rsi)来代替FBO一词,我们将rsi定义为:“基于宗教的启发,旨在为弱势群体组织集体行动和/或提供支持或服务的倡议。”这些计划可以从小规模的特别计划到大规模的正式组织。关键词:信仰组织、定义、贫困、团结、宗教披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。我们从表中省略了5篇文献综述。当特定作者的定义使用了一次以上时,我们在表中给出第一次出现的完整定义;在随后的场合,我们提到了作者。本范围审查是由two项目资助的SOLIGION项目(2021-2024)的一部分,项目编号:S006621N
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Faith-based organizations and poverty alleviation: a scoping review on definitions and terminology (2010–2021)
ABSTRACTIn this paper, we present the results of a scoping review in which we examined the scientific literature (2010–2021) on faith-based organizations (FBOs) working within the field of poverty alleviation, focusing on the way studies define and use the term FBO. Fifty-two relevant studies were identified and included. Our research shows that the term FBOs is primarily used in American studies. Moreover, there is no broad consensus on the exact definition or meaning of the term nor on its scope. Because of this lack of consensus and the inherent shortcomings of the term, we suggest to replace the term FBO by the term “religion-based solidarity initiatives” (RSIs), We define RSIs as: “Initiatives that, from a religious inspiration, aim at organizing collective action for and/or providing support or services to people in vulnerable positions.” These initiatives can range from small scale ad hoc initiatives till large scale formal organizations.KEYWORDS: Faith-based organizationsdefinitionpovertysolidarityreligion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. We left out the five articles that are literature reviews from the table.2. When the definition of specific author(s) is used more than once, we give the complete the first time it appears in the table; on subsequent occasions we mention the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis scoping review is part of the SOLIGION project (2021–2024) funded by the FWO project number: S006621N
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: In the Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, scholars, researchers, and practitioners examine issues of social justice and religion as they relate to the development of policy and delivery of social services. In addition to timely literature reviews, the journal presents up-to-date, in-depth, expert information on: sectarian and nonsectarian approaches to spirituality and ethics; justice and peace; philosophically oriented aspects of religion in the social services; conceptual frameworks; the philosophy of social work; and a great deal more.
期刊最新文献
Faith-based organizations and poverty alleviation: a scoping review on definitions and terminology (2010–2021) Mind the gap: strategies for child protection in communities and organizations Social work practice, religion, and faith: helping and harming; convergence and divergence “It’s not about imposing what I believe or what I value”: Social workers’ personal reflections on religion and spirituality and their influence on practice Leadership Wholeness, Volume 1 A Model of Spiritual Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1