2010-2021年津巴布韦特别临时居留许可审查

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politikon Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1080/02589346.2023.2260630
Zvikomborero Maziyanhanga, Mandisi Majavu
{"title":"2010-2021年津巴布韦特别临时居留许可审查","authors":"Zvikomborero Maziyanhanga, Mandisi Majavu","doi":"10.1080/02589346.2023.2260630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article reviews the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits to demonstrate how these permits have, over the past 13 years, been used to limit Zimbabwean migrants from accessing permanent residency and South African citizenship. For instance, we illustrate in this article how the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits effectively marked Zimbabweans as perpetual outsiders with no rights to reside indefinitely in South Africa, even though some Zimbabwean migrants have been living in the country on an ongoing basis for the past two decades. The Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits keep Zimbabwean migrants in a ‘temporary migration status’ as ‘guest workers’ who are expected to eventually ‘go back home’. We further argue that although the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits are not racist tools per se, they are exclusionary tools that embody analogous, exclusionary and othering logic as the twentieth-century migrant labour system that the White South African government used to banish all Blacks from the category of citizenship. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":45047,"journal":{"name":"Politikon","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical review of the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits, 2010–2021\",\"authors\":\"Zvikomborero Maziyanhanga, Mandisi Majavu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589346.2023.2260630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis article reviews the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits to demonstrate how these permits have, over the past 13 years, been used to limit Zimbabwean migrants from accessing permanent residency and South African citizenship. For instance, we illustrate in this article how the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits effectively marked Zimbabweans as perpetual outsiders with no rights to reside indefinitely in South Africa, even though some Zimbabwean migrants have been living in the country on an ongoing basis for the past two decades. The Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits keep Zimbabwean migrants in a ‘temporary migration status’ as ‘guest workers’ who are expected to eventually ‘go back home’. We further argue that although the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits are not racist tools per se, they are exclusionary tools that embody analogous, exclusionary and othering logic as the twentieth-century migrant labour system that the White South African government used to banish all Blacks from the category of citizenship. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politikon\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politikon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2023.2260630\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politikon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2023.2260630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文回顾了津巴布韦的特别临时居留许可,以证明在过去的13年中,这些许可是如何被用来限制津巴布韦移民获得永久居留权和南非公民身份的。例如,我们在这篇文章中说明了津巴布韦特别临时居留证如何有效地将津巴布韦人标记为永久的外来者,没有权利无限期地居住在南非,尽管一些津巴布韦移民在过去的二十年里一直生活在这个国家。津巴布韦特别临时居留许可使津巴布韦移民处于“临时移民身份”,即“客工”,他们最终有望“回家”。我们进一步认为,尽管津巴布韦的特殊临时居留证本身不是种族主义工具,但它们是排他性的工具,体现了与20世纪南非白人政府用来将所有黑人从公民类别中驱逐出去的移民劳工制度类似的、排他性的和其他逻辑。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A critical review of the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits, 2010–2021
ABSTRACTThis article reviews the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits to demonstrate how these permits have, over the past 13 years, been used to limit Zimbabwean migrants from accessing permanent residency and South African citizenship. For instance, we illustrate in this article how the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits effectively marked Zimbabweans as perpetual outsiders with no rights to reside indefinitely in South Africa, even though some Zimbabwean migrants have been living in the country on an ongoing basis for the past two decades. The Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits keep Zimbabwean migrants in a ‘temporary migration status’ as ‘guest workers’ who are expected to eventually ‘go back home’. We further argue that although the Zimbabwe special temporary residence permits are not racist tools per se, they are exclusionary tools that embody analogous, exclusionary and othering logic as the twentieth-century migrant labour system that the White South African government used to banish all Blacks from the category of citizenship. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politikon
Politikon POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Politikon focuses primarily on South African politics, but not exclusively so. Over the years the journal has published articles by some of the world" leading political scientists, including Arend Lijphart, Samuel Huntingdon, and Philippe Schmitter. It has also featured important contributions from South Africa"s leading political philosophers, political scientists and international relations experts. It has proved an influential journal, particularly in debates over the merits of South Africa"s constitutional reforms (in 1983 and 1994). In the last few years special issues have focused on women and politics in South Africa, and the South African election of 1999.
期刊最新文献
Combatants in African conflicts, professionals, praetorians, militias, insurgents and mercenaries Combatants in African conflicts, professionals, praetorians, militias, insurgents and mercenaries , by, Simon David Taylor, London, Routledge, May 2022, 248pp., £130.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781351065467 Amin’s progressive internationalism EU sanctions on Zimbabwe: rethinking Africa’s economic and political security in the global age Beyond the debate: decolonisation, decoloniality and the reframing of development in Africa Between Samir Amin and Claude Ake: towards a roadmap for Africa’s development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1