中国对美国青年的欺骗

William H. Jeynes
{"title":"中国对美国青年的欺骗","authors":"William H. Jeynes","doi":"10.5840/jis2023351/25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay addresses four of the primary ways that China is deceiving America’s youth into self-defeating and self-destructive behavior. The strategies include global re-education as indoctrination, the production of prerequisite ingredients for fentanyl, hi-tech apps such as TikTok, and Confucius Institutes. The evidence shows that too many Western, including American, policy-makers readily accept Chinese Communist Party’s revisionist history, and tend to disparage what often are reasonably accurate accounts of history from their own countries. The essay also calls for greater awareness and compassion regarding fentanyl opioid addiction and comprehension of TikTok’s deleterious effects. Americans need to be more aware of the views of professors who have participated in Confucius Institutes that compromise academic freedom. The essay concludes that the United States should be more discerning about China’s motives, especially with regards to youths, in extending “soft power” to Sino-form the world, and act to counter China’s quest for world dominance.","PeriodicalId":36073,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China’s Deceit of U.S. Youth\",\"authors\":\"William H. Jeynes\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/jis2023351/25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay addresses four of the primary ways that China is deceiving America’s youth into self-defeating and self-destructive behavior. The strategies include global re-education as indoctrination, the production of prerequisite ingredients for fentanyl, hi-tech apps such as TikTok, and Confucius Institutes. The evidence shows that too many Western, including American, policy-makers readily accept Chinese Communist Party’s revisionist history, and tend to disparage what often are reasonably accurate accounts of history from their own countries. The essay also calls for greater awareness and compassion regarding fentanyl opioid addiction and comprehension of TikTok’s deleterious effects. Americans need to be more aware of the views of professors who have participated in Confucius Institutes that compromise academic freedom. The essay concludes that the United States should be more discerning about China’s motives, especially with regards to youths, in extending “soft power” to Sino-form the world, and act to counter China’s quest for world dominance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/jis2023351/25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/jis2023351/25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章阐述了中国欺骗美国年轻人自我挫败和自我毁灭行为的四种主要方式。这些策略包括全球再教育作为灌输,生产芬太尼的先决条件成分,抖音等高科技应用程序,以及孔子学院。有证据表明,包括美国在内的太多西方国家的政策制定者欣然接受了中国共产党的修正主义历史,并倾向于贬低他们自己国家对历史的合理准确的描述。这篇文章还呼吁人们提高对芬太尼类阿片类药物成瘾的认识和同情,并理解TikTok的有害影响。美国人需要更多地了解参与孔子学院的教授们损害学术自由的观点。这篇文章的结论是,在将“软实力”扩展到中国的世界中,美国应该更清楚地了解中国的动机,尤其是在年轻人方面,并采取行动对抗中国对世界主导地位的追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
China’s Deceit of U.S. Youth
This essay addresses four of the primary ways that China is deceiving America’s youth into self-defeating and self-destructive behavior. The strategies include global re-education as indoctrination, the production of prerequisite ingredients for fentanyl, hi-tech apps such as TikTok, and Confucius Institutes. The evidence shows that too many Western, including American, policy-makers readily accept Chinese Communist Party’s revisionist history, and tend to disparage what often are reasonably accurate accounts of history from their own countries. The essay also calls for greater awareness and compassion regarding fentanyl opioid addiction and comprehension of TikTok’s deleterious effects. Americans need to be more aware of the views of professors who have participated in Confucius Institutes that compromise academic freedom. The essay concludes that the United States should be more discerning about China’s motives, especially with regards to youths, in extending “soft power” to Sino-form the world, and act to counter China’s quest for world dominance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Role of Institutional Governance in Climate Action in the Western Balkans Economies Smart City Strategies in Slovak Cities Determining a Revenue Generating Model that Creates Customer Value by Using a Skip-the-line Application in Romania State and Entrepreneurship on the Road to Green Growth in a Post Lignite Era: Friends or Foes? Awareness of Unethical Artificial Intelligence and its Mitigation Measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1