"人类最大的贱民是女基督徒"(?)解放话语中的教会与宗教

Magdalena Sadlik
{"title":"\"人类最大的贱民是女基督徒\"(?)解放话语中的教会与宗教","authors":"Magdalena Sadlik","doi":"10.31338/2657-599x.ph.2023-2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic signaled by the title is presented on the basis of several journalistic texts: the controversial book Thalitha kumi and articles by “fighting” women, including Cecylia Walewska, Kazimiera Bujwidowa, Iza Moszczeńska, Maria Turzyma, and Maria Czesława Przewóska. The fate of women over the centuries presented in them forms the “history of injustice,” which was blamed on, among other things, Christianity, which had distorted the teachings of Jesus. In the name of fighting forces hostile to progress, emancipatory journalism repeatedly attacked the institutional Church, seen as a bedrock of conservatism, backwardness, and dogmatism.","PeriodicalId":500644,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Humanistyczny","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"„Największym pariasem rodu ludzkiego jest kobieta chrześcijanka” (?) Kościół i religia w dyskursie emancypacyjnym\",\"authors\":\"Magdalena Sadlik\",\"doi\":\"10.31338/2657-599x.ph.2023-2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The topic signaled by the title is presented on the basis of several journalistic texts: the controversial book Thalitha kumi and articles by “fighting” women, including Cecylia Walewska, Kazimiera Bujwidowa, Iza Moszczeńska, Maria Turzyma, and Maria Czesława Przewóska. The fate of women over the centuries presented in them forms the “history of injustice,” which was blamed on, among other things, Christianity, which had distorted the teachings of Jesus. In the name of fighting forces hostile to progress, emancipatory journalism repeatedly attacked the institutional Church, seen as a bedrock of conservatism, backwardness, and dogmatism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przegląd Humanistyczny\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przegląd Humanistyczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31338/2657-599x.ph.2023-2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Humanistyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31338/2657-599x.ph.2023-2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

题目所表达的主题是基于几篇新闻文本:有争议的书《Thalitha kumi》,以及“战斗”女性的文章,包括Cecylia Walewska、Kazimiera Bujwidowa、Iza Moszczeńska、Maria Turzyma和Maria Czesława Przewóska。几个世纪以来,妇女的命运在这些书中呈现出来,形成了“不公正的历史”,这被归咎于基督教,因为基督教扭曲了耶稣的教义。在与敌视进步的势力斗争的名义下,解放新闻不断地攻击被视为保守主义、落后和教条主义基石的教会体制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
„Największym pariasem rodu ludzkiego jest kobieta chrześcijanka” (?) Kościół i religia w dyskursie emancypacyjnym
The topic signaled by the title is presented on the basis of several journalistic texts: the controversial book Thalitha kumi and articles by “fighting” women, including Cecylia Walewska, Kazimiera Bujwidowa, Iza Moszczeńska, Maria Turzyma, and Maria Czesława Przewóska. The fate of women over the centuries presented in them forms the “history of injustice,” which was blamed on, among other things, Christianity, which had distorted the teachings of Jesus. In the name of fighting forces hostile to progress, emancipatory journalism repeatedly attacked the institutional Church, seen as a bedrock of conservatism, backwardness, and dogmatism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nadprzyrodzoność a wyzwolenie człowieka. Wokół związków religii i emancypacji w pismach Stanisława Brzozowskiego Szczeliny dla wolnomyślnych powiewów. Polskie taktyki przekładowe dzieł Johna Williama Drapera Mistycyzm – konserwatyzm – emancypacja. Lucjan Siemieński czyta św. Teresę z Ávili Po co czytać Konopnicką? „Największym pariasem rodu ludzkiego jest kobieta chrześcijanka” (?) Kościół i religia w dyskursie emancypacyjnym
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1