幼儿机器人:儿童阅读和编写程序的信念和客观能力

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Research in Childhood Education Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1080/02568543.2023.2259946
Rina Zviel Girshin, Nathan Rosenberg, Ida Kukliansky
{"title":"幼儿机器人:儿童阅读和编写程序的信念和客观能力","authors":"Rina Zviel Girshin, Nathan Rosenberg, Ida Kukliansky","doi":"10.1080/02568543.2023.2259946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This longitudinal study of robot programming in early childhood (ROPEC) was performed based on summative and formative assessments of the robotics program in kindergarten and year one of elementary school. The study aims to broaden our knowledge about children’s understanding of programming, their confidence in ability to read and write programs, and their real capabilities of reading and explaining programs. In this study, we used a sample of 114 children (age 5–7 years) participating in the robotics program. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from participant interviews. We added to the usual surveys a real evaluation by experts of children’s capability to read and explain the code. Unique emphasis was put on being able to assess objective vs. subjective aspects of a ROPEC participant. Our findings revealed significant differences between objective beliefs and real capabilities of children that should be dealt with in any robot programming; however, the findings were very positive. The results of this study provide crucial evidence that participation in ROPEC contributes in reducing the gender gap in science and engineering. Girls are not less interested or capable than boys in reading, writing, or explaining the code and in important aspects are even better and more eager.","PeriodicalId":46739,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Childhood Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Childhood Robotics: Children’s Beliefs and Objective Capabilities to Read and Write Programs\",\"authors\":\"Rina Zviel Girshin, Nathan Rosenberg, Ida Kukliansky\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02568543.2023.2259946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This longitudinal study of robot programming in early childhood (ROPEC) was performed based on summative and formative assessments of the robotics program in kindergarten and year one of elementary school. The study aims to broaden our knowledge about children’s understanding of programming, their confidence in ability to read and write programs, and their real capabilities of reading and explaining programs. In this study, we used a sample of 114 children (age 5–7 years) participating in the robotics program. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from participant interviews. We added to the usual surveys a real evaluation by experts of children’s capability to read and explain the code. Unique emphasis was put on being able to assess objective vs. subjective aspects of a ROPEC participant. Our findings revealed significant differences between objective beliefs and real capabilities of children that should be dealt with in any robot programming; however, the findings were very positive. The results of this study provide crucial evidence that participation in ROPEC contributes in reducing the gender gap in science and engineering. Girls are not less interested or capable than boys in reading, writing, or explaining the code and in important aspects are even better and more eager.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Childhood Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Childhood Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2023.2259946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Childhood Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2023.2259946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项关于幼儿机器人编程(ROPEC)的纵向研究是基于对幼儿园和小学一年级机器人项目的总结性和形成性评估进行的。这项研究的目的是拓宽我们对儿童对编程的理解,他们对阅读和编写程序的能力的信心,以及他们阅读和解释程序的真实能力的认识。在这项研究中,我们使用了114名儿童(5-7岁)参加机器人项目的样本。从参与者访谈中收集定量和定性数据。我们在通常的调查中加入了专家对儿童阅读和解释代码能力的真实评估。独特的重点放在能够评估欧佩克参与者的客观与主观方面。我们的研究结果揭示了在任何机器人编程中应该处理的客观信念和儿童的实际能力之间的显著差异;然而,调查结果是非常积极的。本研究的结果提供了重要的证据,证明参与欧佩克有助于缩小科学和工程领域的性别差距。女孩在阅读、写作和解释代码方面的兴趣和能力并不比男孩差,在一些重要的方面甚至比男孩更好、更渴望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Childhood Robotics: Children’s Beliefs and Objective Capabilities to Read and Write Programs
This longitudinal study of robot programming in early childhood (ROPEC) was performed based on summative and formative assessments of the robotics program in kindergarten and year one of elementary school. The study aims to broaden our knowledge about children’s understanding of programming, their confidence in ability to read and write programs, and their real capabilities of reading and explaining programs. In this study, we used a sample of 114 children (age 5–7 years) participating in the robotics program. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from participant interviews. We added to the usual surveys a real evaluation by experts of children’s capability to read and explain the code. Unique emphasis was put on being able to assess objective vs. subjective aspects of a ROPEC participant. Our findings revealed significant differences between objective beliefs and real capabilities of children that should be dealt with in any robot programming; however, the findings were very positive. The results of this study provide crucial evidence that participation in ROPEC contributes in reducing the gender gap in science and engineering. Girls are not less interested or capable than boys in reading, writing, or explaining the code and in important aspects are even better and more eager.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Childhood Education
Journal of Research in Childhood Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Childhood Education, a publication of the Association for Childhood Education International, features articles that advance knowledge and theory of the education of children, infancy through early adolescence. Consideration is given to reports of empirical research, theoretical articles, ethnographic and case studies, participant observation studies, and studies deriving data collected from naturalistic settings. Cross-cultural studies and those addressing international concerns are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Gendering Emotions Work in Primary Schools: “Effortless” or “Important”? How and When Does Early Home Learning Environment Improve Children’s Kindergarten Academic Skills? The Roles of Language Ability and Self-Control “My Child Might Be Thinking About Something Beneficial to Humanity”: Enhancing Parental Perspectives on Engineering Education in Early Childhood “Transience, Disruption, and Unfamiliarity in Refugee Journeys”: How Are Newly Arrived Refugee Families Supported in Their Children’s Transition to School in a Host Country? Family Engagement Practices in a Public Pre-Kindergarten Program: Variation by Program, Classroom, and Staff Characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1