基于动、静应力的深空边巷道冲击地压机理研究

IF 4.5 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1080/19475705.2023.2271636
Zepeng Han, Linming Dou, Siyuan Gong, Jiliang Kan, Shuai Chen, Xiaoyi He
{"title":"基于动、静应力的深空边巷道冲击地压机理研究","authors":"Zepeng Han, Linming Dou, Siyuan Gong, Jiliang Kan, Shuai Chen, Xiaoyi He","doi":"10.1080/19475705.2023.2271636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep gob-side entry (DGSE) shows rock burst risk under the condition of kilometer depth and hard roof. Based on the established conditions of the Tengdong coal mine, theoretical analysis, microseismic (MS) monitoring, and numerical modeling were used to study the rock burst mechanism of DGSE. Results show that MS events mainly occurred on the solid side of DGSE and the intense dynamic load was mainly caused by the breaking of low hard roof strata, which can release 2.64 × 105 J elastic energy per meter. The surrounding stress of DGSE was asymmetrical due to the coal pillar yielding and hanging roof’s weight, and the load of coal pillar is negatively correlated with that of solid. Simulation shows the vertical stress evolution of coal pillar and solid shows significant diversity. Coal pillar’s vertical stress first drops sharply, and then increases gradually, finally stable at 10.6 MPa with the DGSE’s excavation. Contrarily, solid’s vertical stress gradually rises and was finally stable at 40.9 MPa. Under roof dynamic loading, the vibration velocity of the entry’s top was higher than that of the floor which was caused by the increase of the propagation distance and the reflection and diffraction effect of waves. The vibration velocity of the coal pillar was significantly higher than that of the solid which is because higher stress can lead to faster attenuation of vibration velocity. After dynamic loading, the coal pillar’s principal stress and principal stress difference decreased while that of the solid can be divided into two drop areas and one rising area. Periodic pressure relief that was carried out in the rising area can reduce the rock burst risk on the solid side of DGSE.","PeriodicalId":51283,"journal":{"name":"Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanism of rock burst in deep gob-side entry based on dynamic and static stress: a case study\",\"authors\":\"Zepeng Han, Linming Dou, Siyuan Gong, Jiliang Kan, Shuai Chen, Xiaoyi He\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19475705.2023.2271636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep gob-side entry (DGSE) shows rock burst risk under the condition of kilometer depth and hard roof. Based on the established conditions of the Tengdong coal mine, theoretical analysis, microseismic (MS) monitoring, and numerical modeling were used to study the rock burst mechanism of DGSE. Results show that MS events mainly occurred on the solid side of DGSE and the intense dynamic load was mainly caused by the breaking of low hard roof strata, which can release 2.64 × 105 J elastic energy per meter. The surrounding stress of DGSE was asymmetrical due to the coal pillar yielding and hanging roof’s weight, and the load of coal pillar is negatively correlated with that of solid. Simulation shows the vertical stress evolution of coal pillar and solid shows significant diversity. Coal pillar’s vertical stress first drops sharply, and then increases gradually, finally stable at 10.6 MPa with the DGSE’s excavation. Contrarily, solid’s vertical stress gradually rises and was finally stable at 40.9 MPa. Under roof dynamic loading, the vibration velocity of the entry’s top was higher than that of the floor which was caused by the increase of the propagation distance and the reflection and diffraction effect of waves. The vibration velocity of the coal pillar was significantly higher than that of the solid which is because higher stress can lead to faster attenuation of vibration velocity. After dynamic loading, the coal pillar’s principal stress and principal stress difference decreased while that of the solid can be divided into two drop areas and one rising area. Periodic pressure relief that was carried out in the rising area can reduce the rock burst risk on the solid side of DGSE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2271636\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2271636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深空侧巷道在公里深、硬顶板条件下具有冲击地压危险性。基于腾东煤矿的既定条件,采用理论分析、微震监测和数值模拟等方法,研究了DGSE岩爆机理。结果表明:MS事件主要发生在DGSE的固体侧,强动荷载主要由低硬顶板岩层破碎引起,每m可释放2.64 × 105 J弹性能;由于煤柱的屈服和上吊顶板的自重,DGSE的周围应力是不对称的,煤柱的载荷与固体的载荷呈负相关。模拟结果表明,煤柱和固体的竖向应力演化具有明显的差异性。随着DGSE的开挖,煤柱竖向应力先急剧下降后逐渐增大,最终稳定在10.6 MPa。相反,固体垂直应力逐渐升高,最终稳定在40.9 MPa。顶板动荷载作用下,巷道顶部的振动速度高于底板,这是由于波的传播距离增大和波的反射和衍射作用所致。煤柱的振动速度明显高于固体,这是由于应力越高,振动速度衰减越快。动加载后煤柱主应力和主应力差减小,固体主应力和主应力差可分为两个下降区和一个上升区。在上升区进行周期性泄压,可以降低岩体固体侧的冲击地压风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mechanism of rock burst in deep gob-side entry based on dynamic and static stress: a case study
Deep gob-side entry (DGSE) shows rock burst risk under the condition of kilometer depth and hard roof. Based on the established conditions of the Tengdong coal mine, theoretical analysis, microseismic (MS) monitoring, and numerical modeling were used to study the rock burst mechanism of DGSE. Results show that MS events mainly occurred on the solid side of DGSE and the intense dynamic load was mainly caused by the breaking of low hard roof strata, which can release 2.64 × 105 J elastic energy per meter. The surrounding stress of DGSE was asymmetrical due to the coal pillar yielding and hanging roof’s weight, and the load of coal pillar is negatively correlated with that of solid. Simulation shows the vertical stress evolution of coal pillar and solid shows significant diversity. Coal pillar’s vertical stress first drops sharply, and then increases gradually, finally stable at 10.6 MPa with the DGSE’s excavation. Contrarily, solid’s vertical stress gradually rises and was finally stable at 40.9 MPa. Under roof dynamic loading, the vibration velocity of the entry’s top was higher than that of the floor which was caused by the increase of the propagation distance and the reflection and diffraction effect of waves. The vibration velocity of the coal pillar was significantly higher than that of the solid which is because higher stress can lead to faster attenuation of vibration velocity. After dynamic loading, the coal pillar’s principal stress and principal stress difference decreased while that of the solid can be divided into two drop areas and one rising area. Periodic pressure relief that was carried out in the rising area can reduce the rock burst risk on the solid side of DGSE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk
Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk is to address new concepts, approaches and case studies using geospatial and remote sensing techniques to study monitoring, mapping, risk mitigation, risk vulnerability and early warning of natural hazards. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk covers the following topics: - Remote sensing techniques - Natural hazards associated with land, ocean, atmosphere, land-ocean-atmosphere coupling and climate change - Emerging problems related to multi-hazard risk assessment, multi-vulnerability risk assessment, risk quantification and the economic aspects of hazards. - Results of findings on major natural hazards
期刊最新文献
Drought driving mechanism and risk situation prediction based on machine learning models in the Yellow River Basin, China Dynamic association of slope movements in the Uttarakhand Himalaya: a critical review on the landslide susceptibility assessment Co-seismic characterization analysis in PWV and land-atmospheric observations associated with Luding Ms 6.8 earthquake occurrence in China on September 5, 2022 Application research on digital twins of urban earthquake disasters Numerical simulation and safety distance analysis of slope instability of ionic rare earth tailings in different rainy seasons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1