P. R. Miller, S. C. Atencio, C. A. Jones, P. M. Carr, E. Eriksmoen, W. Franck, J. Rickertsen, S. I. Fordyce, M. Ostlie, P. F. Lamb, D. L. Fonseka, M. A. Grusak, C. Chen, M. Bourgault, S. T. Koeshall, K. W. Baber
{"title":"接种剂和肥料对美国北部大平原小扁豆的影响","authors":"P. R. Miller, S. C. Atencio, C. A. Jones, P. M. Carr, E. Eriksmoen, W. Franck, J. Rickertsen, S. I. Fordyce, M. Ostlie, P. F. Lamb, D. L. Fonseka, M. A. Grusak, C. Chen, M. Bourgault, S. T. Koeshall, K. W. Baber","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lentil (<i>Lens culinaris</i> Medikus) is an important crop, averaging over 250,000 ha in Montana and North Dakota during 2016–2021. However, relatively little is known about rhizobial inoculant and fertility response in lentil in the US northern Great Plains. The objective was to evaluate the effect of rhizobial inoculant formulations (seed coat and in-furrow) and nutrient additions (potassium [K], sulfur [S], and micronutrients) on lentil yield and seed protein concentration. This study was conducted at seven university research centers in Montana and North Dakota from 2019 to 2021, resulting in 20 location-years of data. In six of 20 experiments, inoculant application increased seed yield by an average of 36% (323 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) but had no consistent effect on seed protein concentration. Lentil or pea crop history among locations did not explain inoculant response. Inoculant formulations (seed coat vs. in-furrow) and K fertilizer had inconsistent and small effects on seed yield and protein concentration. However, S fertilizer (5.6 kg S ha<sup>−1</sup>) increased seed yield in four of 20 experiments (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.02) by an average of 14.5% (255 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) in those experiments and decreased seed yield for one experiment (<i>p</i> = 0.05) by 5.8% (153 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). Pre-plant SO<sub>4</sub>-S soil test levels did not predict lentil response to S fertilizer. Micronutrient application was assessed in 12 location-years but had no effect on lentil yield or protein concentration. This research suggests a need to better understand what factors control lentil yield and protein response to rhizobial inoculant and S fertilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 2","pages":"704-718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21501","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inoculant and fertilizer effects on lentil in the US northern Great Plains\",\"authors\":\"P. R. Miller, S. C. Atencio, C. A. Jones, P. M. Carr, E. Eriksmoen, W. Franck, J. Rickertsen, S. I. Fordyce, M. Ostlie, P. F. Lamb, D. L. Fonseka, M. A. Grusak, C. Chen, M. Bourgault, S. T. Koeshall, K. W. Baber\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Lentil (<i>Lens culinaris</i> Medikus) is an important crop, averaging over 250,000 ha in Montana and North Dakota during 2016–2021. However, relatively little is known about rhizobial inoculant and fertility response in lentil in the US northern Great Plains. The objective was to evaluate the effect of rhizobial inoculant formulations (seed coat and in-furrow) and nutrient additions (potassium [K], sulfur [S], and micronutrients) on lentil yield and seed protein concentration. This study was conducted at seven university research centers in Montana and North Dakota from 2019 to 2021, resulting in 20 location-years of data. In six of 20 experiments, inoculant application increased seed yield by an average of 36% (323 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) but had no consistent effect on seed protein concentration. Lentil or pea crop history among locations did not explain inoculant response. Inoculant formulations (seed coat vs. in-furrow) and K fertilizer had inconsistent and small effects on seed yield and protein concentration. However, S fertilizer (5.6 kg S ha<sup>−1</sup>) increased seed yield in four of 20 experiments (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.02) by an average of 14.5% (255 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) in those experiments and decreased seed yield for one experiment (<i>p</i> = 0.05) by 5.8% (153 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). Pre-plant SO<sub>4</sub>-S soil test levels did not predict lentil response to S fertilizer. Micronutrient application was assessed in 12 location-years but had no effect on lentil yield or protein concentration. This research suggests a need to better understand what factors control lentil yield and protein response to rhizobial inoculant and S fertilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 2\",\"pages\":\"704-718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21501\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21501\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21501","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inoculant and fertilizer effects on lentil in the US northern Great Plains
Lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) is an important crop, averaging over 250,000 ha in Montana and North Dakota during 2016–2021. However, relatively little is known about rhizobial inoculant and fertility response in lentil in the US northern Great Plains. The objective was to evaluate the effect of rhizobial inoculant formulations (seed coat and in-furrow) and nutrient additions (potassium [K], sulfur [S], and micronutrients) on lentil yield and seed protein concentration. This study was conducted at seven university research centers in Montana and North Dakota from 2019 to 2021, resulting in 20 location-years of data. In six of 20 experiments, inoculant application increased seed yield by an average of 36% (323 kg ha−1, p ≤ 0.05) but had no consistent effect on seed protein concentration. Lentil or pea crop history among locations did not explain inoculant response. Inoculant formulations (seed coat vs. in-furrow) and K fertilizer had inconsistent and small effects on seed yield and protein concentration. However, S fertilizer (5.6 kg S ha−1) increased seed yield in four of 20 experiments (p ≤ 0.02) by an average of 14.5% (255 kg ha−1) in those experiments and decreased seed yield for one experiment (p = 0.05) by 5.8% (153 kg ha−1). Pre-plant SO4-S soil test levels did not predict lentil response to S fertilizer. Micronutrient application was assessed in 12 location-years but had no effect on lentil yield or protein concentration. This research suggests a need to better understand what factors control lentil yield and protein response to rhizobial inoculant and S fertilization.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.