对冲基金和其他机构投资者之间的分歧以及股票预期收益的横截面

IF 2.6 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE FINANCIAL REVIEW Pub Date : 2022-06-08 DOI:10.1111/fire.12308
Mustafa O. Caglayan, Umut Celiker, Gokhan Sonaer
{"title":"对冲基金和其他机构投资者之间的分歧以及股票预期收益的横截面","authors":"Mustafa O. Caglayan,&nbsp;Umut Celiker,&nbsp;Gokhan Sonaer","doi":"10.1111/fire.12308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We find strong disagreements between hedge funds and other institutions in their common stock trades are twice as likely as agreements. Overall success of hedge funds’ trades and poor performance of non-hedge funds’ trades are both confined to disagreement stocks. Although hedge funds are commonly positive feedback traders, they are neither positive nor negative feedback traders for stocks heavily sold by other institutions. Hedge funds also depend less on earnings news. Our findings highlight the importance of disagreement in studying the performance of institutional investors’ trades and are consistent with the notion that skilled investors rely less on public information.</p>","PeriodicalId":47617,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","volume":"57 3","pages":"663-689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disagreement between hedge funds and other institutional investors and the cross-section of expected stock returns\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa O. Caglayan,&nbsp;Umut Celiker,&nbsp;Gokhan Sonaer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fire.12308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We find strong disagreements between hedge funds and other institutions in their common stock trades are twice as likely as agreements. Overall success of hedge funds’ trades and poor performance of non-hedge funds’ trades are both confined to disagreement stocks. Although hedge funds are commonly positive feedback traders, they are neither positive nor negative feedback traders for stocks heavily sold by other institutions. Hedge funds also depend less on earnings news. Our findings highlight the importance of disagreement in studying the performance of institutional investors’ trades and are consistent with the notion that skilled investors rely less on public information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FINANCIAL REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"663-689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FINANCIAL REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们发现,对冲基金与其他机构在普通股交易中出现强烈分歧的可能性是达成一致的两倍。对冲基金交易的总体成功和非对冲基金交易的糟糕表现都局限于不一致的股票。尽管对冲基金通常是正反馈交易者,但对于其他机构大量卖出的股票,它们既不是正反馈交易者,也不是负反馈交易者。对冲基金对收益消息的依赖程度也有所下降。我们的研究结果强调了在研究机构投资者交易绩效时分歧的重要性,并与熟练投资者较少依赖公开信息的观点一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disagreement between hedge funds and other institutional investors and the cross-section of expected stock returns

We find strong disagreements between hedge funds and other institutions in their common stock trades are twice as likely as agreements. Overall success of hedge funds’ trades and poor performance of non-hedge funds’ trades are both confined to disagreement stocks. Although hedge funds are commonly positive feedback traders, they are neither positive nor negative feedback traders for stocks heavily sold by other institutions. Hedge funds also depend less on earnings news. Our findings highlight the importance of disagreement in studying the performance of institutional investors’ trades and are consistent with the notion that skilled investors rely less on public information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FINANCIAL REVIEW
FINANCIAL REVIEW BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
28.10%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Issue Information From anecdotes to insights: Streamlining the research idea generation process Mandatory audit partner rotation and earnings informativeness in the bond market Carbon risk and equity prices The value of talents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1