计算机断层扫描引导下经皮肺活检与传统方法的比较:一项开放标签,随机对照试验。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Thoracic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000763
Qin Liu, Xiaoxia Guo, Ziyin Wang, Hao Xu, Wei Huang, Jingjing Liu, Zhongmin Wang, Fuhua Yan, Zhiyuan Wu, Xiaoyi Ding
{"title":"计算机断层扫描引导下经皮肺活检与传统方法的比较:一项开放标签,随机对照试验。","authors":"Qin Liu, Xiaoxia Guo, Ziyin Wang, Hao Xu, Wei Huang, Jingjing Liu, Zhongmin Wang, Fuhua Yan, Zhiyuan Wu, Xiaoyi Ding","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the efficiency and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous biopsy of lung lesions with electromagnetic (EM) navigation and compare them with those of conventional approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-nine patients with lung or liver lesions who needed biopsies were enrolled in this trial. All patients were randomly assigned to the E group underwent CT-guided percutaneous biopsies with the EM navigation system or to the C group treated with conventional approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 27 patients with lung lesions were assigned to the E group, and 20 patients were assigned to the C group. The diagnostic success rate was 92.6% and 95% in both groups, respectively ( P >0.9999). The median number of needle repositions in the E group was less than that in the C group (2.0 vs. 2.5, P =0.03). The positioning success rate with 1 or 2 needle repositions for the E group was significantly higher than the C group (81.5% vs. 50%, P =0.03). The median accuracy of the puncture location in the E group was better than that in the C group (2.0 vs. 6.6 mm, P <0.0001). The total procedure time lengthened in the E group compared with the C group (30.5±1.6 vs. 18.3±1.7 min, P <0.0001), but the number of CT acquisitions was not significantly different ( P =0.08). There was no significant difference in complication incidence between the 2 groups ( P =0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EM navigation system is an effective and safe auxiliary tool for CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy, but lengthen the procedure time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR2100043361, registered February 9, 2021-retrospectively registered ( http://www.medresman.org.cn/uc/project/projectedit.aspx?proj=7591 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"247-254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed Tomography-guided Percutaneous Lung Biopsy With Electromagnetic Navigation Compared With Conventional Approaches: An Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Qin Liu, Xiaoxia Guo, Ziyin Wang, Hao Xu, Wei Huang, Jingjing Liu, Zhongmin Wang, Fuhua Yan, Zhiyuan Wu, Xiaoyi Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the efficiency and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous biopsy of lung lesions with electromagnetic (EM) navigation and compare them with those of conventional approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-nine patients with lung or liver lesions who needed biopsies were enrolled in this trial. All patients were randomly assigned to the E group underwent CT-guided percutaneous biopsies with the EM navigation system or to the C group treated with conventional approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 27 patients with lung lesions were assigned to the E group, and 20 patients were assigned to the C group. The diagnostic success rate was 92.6% and 95% in both groups, respectively ( P >0.9999). The median number of needle repositions in the E group was less than that in the C group (2.0 vs. 2.5, P =0.03). The positioning success rate with 1 or 2 needle repositions for the E group was significantly higher than the C group (81.5% vs. 50%, P =0.03). The median accuracy of the puncture location in the E group was better than that in the C group (2.0 vs. 6.6 mm, P <0.0001). The total procedure time lengthened in the E group compared with the C group (30.5±1.6 vs. 18.3±1.7 min, P <0.0001), but the number of CT acquisitions was not significantly different ( P =0.08). There was no significant difference in complication incidence between the 2 groups ( P =0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EM navigation system is an effective and safe auxiliary tool for CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy, but lengthen the procedure time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR2100043361, registered February 9, 2021-retrospectively registered ( http://www.medresman.org.cn/uc/project/projectedit.aspx?proj=7591 ).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"247-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000763\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估电磁(EM)导航下计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下经皮肺组织活检的有效性和安全性,并与传统方法进行比较。材料和方法:本试验纳入了79例需要活检的肺或肝病变患者。所有患者被随机分配到E组,在EM导航系统下进行ct引导下的经皮活检,C组采用常规方法治疗。结果:共有27例肺部病变患者被分为E组,20例患者被分为C组。两组诊断成功率分别为92.6%和95% (P < 0.05)。E组的中位换针次数少于C组(2.0 vs. 2.5, P=0.03)。E组复位1、2针的定位成功率明显高于C组(81.5% vs. 50%, P=0.03)。E组穿刺位置的中位精度优于C组(2.0 vs. 6.6 mm)。结论:EM导航系统是ct引导下经皮肺活检有效、安全的辅助工具,但会延长手术时间。试验注册:ChiCTR2100043361,注册于2021年2月9日-回顾性注册(http://www.medresman.org.cn/uc/project/projectedit.aspx?proj=7591)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computed Tomography-guided Percutaneous Lung Biopsy With Electromagnetic Navigation Compared With Conventional Approaches: An Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficiency and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous biopsy of lung lesions with electromagnetic (EM) navigation and compare them with those of conventional approaches.

Materials and methods: Seventy-nine patients with lung or liver lesions who needed biopsies were enrolled in this trial. All patients were randomly assigned to the E group underwent CT-guided percutaneous biopsies with the EM navigation system or to the C group treated with conventional approaches.

Results: In total, 27 patients with lung lesions were assigned to the E group, and 20 patients were assigned to the C group. The diagnostic success rate was 92.6% and 95% in both groups, respectively ( P >0.9999). The median number of needle repositions in the E group was less than that in the C group (2.0 vs. 2.5, P =0.03). The positioning success rate with 1 or 2 needle repositions for the E group was significantly higher than the C group (81.5% vs. 50%, P =0.03). The median accuracy of the puncture location in the E group was better than that in the C group (2.0 vs. 6.6 mm, P <0.0001). The total procedure time lengthened in the E group compared with the C group (30.5±1.6 vs. 18.3±1.7 min, P <0.0001), but the number of CT acquisitions was not significantly different ( P =0.08). There was no significant difference in complication incidence between the 2 groups ( P =0.44).

Conclusion: The EM navigation system is an effective and safe auxiliary tool for CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy, but lengthen the procedure time.

Trial registration: ChiCTR2100043361, registered February 9, 2021-retrospectively registered ( http://www.medresman.org.cn/uc/project/projectedit.aspx?proj=7591 ).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Resolution Fidelity Comparison Between Energy Integrating and Deep Silicon Photon Counting CT: Implications for Pulmonary Imaging. Incidental Apical Pleuroparenchymal Scarring on Computed Tomography: Diagnostic Yield, Progression, Morphologic Features and Clinical Significance. The Relationship Between Cardiac CT-based Left Atrial Structure and Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Postablation Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Within 2 Years. Left Atrial Strain for Prediction of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking. Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression Provides Incremental Prognostic Value and Optimizes Risk Reclassification by Computed Tomography Angiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1