重新思考缺失的数据:有意识的不确定性建议

IF 7.5 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Big Data Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1109/TBDATA.2023.3300547
Chenxu Wang;Fuli Feng;Yang Zhang;Qifan Wang;Xunhan Hu;Xiangnan He
{"title":"重新思考缺失的数据:有意识的不确定性建议","authors":"Chenxu Wang;Fuli Feng;Yang Zhang;Qifan Wang;Xunhan Hu;Xiangnan He","doi":"10.1109/TBDATA.2023.3300547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historical interactions are the default choice for recommender model training, which typically exhibit high sparsity, i.e., most user-item pairs are unobserved missing data. A standard choice is treating the missing data as negative training samples and estimating interaction likelihood between user-item pairs along with the observed interactions. In this way, some potential interactions are inevitably mislabeled during training, which will hurt the model fidelity, hindering the model to recall the mislabeled items, especially the long-tail ones. In this work, we investigate the mislabeling issue from a new perspective of \n<italic>aleatoric uncertainty</i>\n, which describes the inherent randomness of missing data. The randomness pushes us to go beyond merely the interaction likelihood and embrace aleatoric uncertainty modeling. Towards this end, we propose a new \n<italic>Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation</i>\n (AUR) framework that consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model. According to the theory of aleatoric uncertainty, we derive a new recommendation objective to learn the estimator. As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty, which is demonstrated to improve the recommendation performance of less popular items without sacrificing the overall performance. We instantiate AUR on three representative recommender models: Matrix Factorization (MF), LightGCN, and VAE from mainstream model architectures. Extensive results on four real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of AUR w.r.t. better recommendation results, especially on long-tail items.","PeriodicalId":13106,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Big Data","volume":"9 6","pages":"1607-1619"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendation\",\"authors\":\"Chenxu Wang;Fuli Feng;Yang Zhang;Qifan Wang;Xunhan Hu;Xiangnan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TBDATA.2023.3300547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Historical interactions are the default choice for recommender model training, which typically exhibit high sparsity, i.e., most user-item pairs are unobserved missing data. A standard choice is treating the missing data as negative training samples and estimating interaction likelihood between user-item pairs along with the observed interactions. In this way, some potential interactions are inevitably mislabeled during training, which will hurt the model fidelity, hindering the model to recall the mislabeled items, especially the long-tail ones. In this work, we investigate the mislabeling issue from a new perspective of \\n<italic>aleatoric uncertainty</i>\\n, which describes the inherent randomness of missing data. The randomness pushes us to go beyond merely the interaction likelihood and embrace aleatoric uncertainty modeling. Towards this end, we propose a new \\n<italic>Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation</i>\\n (AUR) framework that consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model. According to the theory of aleatoric uncertainty, we derive a new recommendation objective to learn the estimator. As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty, which is demonstrated to improve the recommendation performance of less popular items without sacrificing the overall performance. We instantiate AUR on three representative recommender models: Matrix Factorization (MF), LightGCN, and VAE from mainstream model architectures. Extensive results on four real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of AUR w.r.t. better recommendation results, especially on long-tail items.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Big Data\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"1607-1619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Big Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10198303/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10198303/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

历史交互是推荐模型训练的默认选择,它通常表现出高稀疏性,即大多数用户-项目对都是未观察到的缺失数据。一种标准的选择是将缺失的数据作为负训练样本,并根据观察到的交互估计用户-物品对之间的交互可能性。这样,在训练过程中不可避免地会出现一些潜在的交互误标注,这会影响模型的保真度,阻碍模型对错误标注的项目,特别是长尾项目的召回。在这项工作中,我们从任意不确定性的新角度研究了错误标记问题,它描述了丢失数据的固有随机性。随机性促使我们超越仅仅是相互作用的可能性,而拥抱任意的不确定性模型。为此,我们提出了一个新的任意不确定性感知推荐(AUR)框架,该框架由一个新的不确定性估计器和一个正常的推荐模型组成。根据任意不确定性理论,提出了一种新的推荐目标来学习估计量。由于错误标注的概率反映了一对商品的潜力,AUR根据不确定性进行推荐,在不牺牲整体性能的情况下提高了不太受欢迎商品的推荐性能。我们在三个代表性的推荐模型上实例化AUR:矩阵分解(MF)、LightGCN和主流模型体系结构中的VAE。在四个真实数据集上的广泛结果验证了AUR w.r.t.的有效性,获得了更好的推荐结果,特别是在长尾项目上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendation
Historical interactions are the default choice for recommender model training, which typically exhibit high sparsity, i.e., most user-item pairs are unobserved missing data. A standard choice is treating the missing data as negative training samples and estimating interaction likelihood between user-item pairs along with the observed interactions. In this way, some potential interactions are inevitably mislabeled during training, which will hurt the model fidelity, hindering the model to recall the mislabeled items, especially the long-tail ones. In this work, we investigate the mislabeling issue from a new perspective of aleatoric uncertainty , which describes the inherent randomness of missing data. The randomness pushes us to go beyond merely the interaction likelihood and embrace aleatoric uncertainty modeling. Towards this end, we propose a new Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation (AUR) framework that consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model. According to the theory of aleatoric uncertainty, we derive a new recommendation objective to learn the estimator. As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty, which is demonstrated to improve the recommendation performance of less popular items without sacrificing the overall performance. We instantiate AUR on three representative recommender models: Matrix Factorization (MF), LightGCN, and VAE from mainstream model architectures. Extensive results on four real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of AUR w.r.t. better recommendation results, especially on long-tail items.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Big Data publishes peer-reviewed articles focusing on big data. These articles present innovative research ideas and application results across disciplines, including novel theories, algorithms, and applications. Research areas cover a wide range, such as big data analytics, visualization, curation, management, semantics, infrastructure, standards, performance analysis, intelligence extraction, scientific discovery, security, privacy, and legal issues specific to big data. The journal also prioritizes applications of big data in fields generating massive datasets.
期刊最新文献
Guest Editorial TBD Special Issue on Graph Machine Learning for Recommender Systems Reliable Data Augmented Contrastive Learning for Sequential Recommendation Denoised Graph Collaborative Filtering via Neighborhood Similarity and Dynamic Thresholding Higher-Order Smoothness Enhanced Graph Collaborative Filtering AKGNN: Attribute Knowledge Graph Neural Networks Recommendation for Corporate Volunteer Activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1