新恐惧症实验设计的“七宗罪”。

IF 2.2 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY Integrative and Comparative Biology Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1093/icb/icad127
Melanie G Kimball, Christine R Lattin
{"title":"新恐惧症实验设计的“七宗罪”。","authors":"Melanie G Kimball, Christine R Lattin","doi":"10.1093/icb/icad127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neophobia, an aversive response to novelty, is a behavior with critical ecological and evolutionary relevance for wild populations because it directly influences animals' ability to adapt to new environments and exploit novel resources. Neophobia has been described in a wide variety of different animal species from arachnids to zebra finches. Because of this widespread prevalence and ecological importance, the number of neophobia studies has continued to increase over time. However, many neophobia studies (as well as many animal behavior studies more generally) suffer from one or more of what we have deemed the \"seven deadly sins\" of neophobia experimental design. These \"sins\" include: (1) animals that are not habituated to the testing environment, (2) problems with novel stimulus selection, (3) non-standardized motivation, (4) pseudoreplication, (5) lack of sufficient controls, (6) fixed treatment order, and (7) using arbitrary thresholds for data analysis. We discuss each of these potential issues in turn and make recommendations for how to avoid them in future behavior research. More consistency in how neophobia studies are designed would facilitate comparisons across different populations and species and allow researchers to better understand whether neophobia can help explain animals' responses to human-altered landscapes and the ability to survive in the Anthropocene.</p>","PeriodicalId":54971,"journal":{"name":"Integrative and Comparative Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The \\\"Seven Deadly Sins\\\" of Neophobia Experimental Design.\",\"authors\":\"Melanie G Kimball, Christine R Lattin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icb/icad127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neophobia, an aversive response to novelty, is a behavior with critical ecological and evolutionary relevance for wild populations because it directly influences animals' ability to adapt to new environments and exploit novel resources. Neophobia has been described in a wide variety of different animal species from arachnids to zebra finches. Because of this widespread prevalence and ecological importance, the number of neophobia studies has continued to increase over time. However, many neophobia studies (as well as many animal behavior studies more generally) suffer from one or more of what we have deemed the \\\"seven deadly sins\\\" of neophobia experimental design. These \\\"sins\\\" include: (1) animals that are not habituated to the testing environment, (2) problems with novel stimulus selection, (3) non-standardized motivation, (4) pseudoreplication, (5) lack of sufficient controls, (6) fixed treatment order, and (7) using arbitrary thresholds for data analysis. We discuss each of these potential issues in turn and make recommendations for how to avoid them in future behavior research. More consistency in how neophobia studies are designed would facilitate comparisons across different populations and species and allow researchers to better understand whether neophobia can help explain animals' responses to human-altered landscapes and the ability to survive in the Anthropocene.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative and Comparative Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative and Comparative Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad127\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative and Comparative Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新事物恐惧症是一种对新奇事物的厌恶反应,是一种与野生种群具有重要生态和进化相关性的行为,因为它直接影响动物适应新环境和开发新资源的能力。从蛛形纲动物到斑胸草雀,各种各样的动物都有恐新症。由于这种广泛的流行和生态重要性,新恐惧症研究的数量随着时间的推移不断增加。然而,许多新恐惧症研究(以及许多更普遍的动物行为研究)都遭受了我们所认为的新恐惧症实验设计的“七宗罪”中的一项或多项。这些“罪”包括:1)动物不适应测试环境,2)新刺激选择的问题,3)非标准化动机,4)伪复制,5)缺乏足够的控制,6)固定的处理顺序,以及7)使用任意阈值进行数据分析。我们依次讨论这些潜在的问题,并就如何在未来的行为研究中避免它们提出建议。新恐惧症研究设计的一致性将有助于不同种群和物种之间的比较,并使研究人员更好地了解新恐惧症是否有助于解释动物对人类改变的景观的反应以及在人类世中生存的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The "Seven Deadly Sins" of Neophobia Experimental Design.

Neophobia, an aversive response to novelty, is a behavior with critical ecological and evolutionary relevance for wild populations because it directly influences animals' ability to adapt to new environments and exploit novel resources. Neophobia has been described in a wide variety of different animal species from arachnids to zebra finches. Because of this widespread prevalence and ecological importance, the number of neophobia studies has continued to increase over time. However, many neophobia studies (as well as many animal behavior studies more generally) suffer from one or more of what we have deemed the "seven deadly sins" of neophobia experimental design. These "sins" include: (1) animals that are not habituated to the testing environment, (2) problems with novel stimulus selection, (3) non-standardized motivation, (4) pseudoreplication, (5) lack of sufficient controls, (6) fixed treatment order, and (7) using arbitrary thresholds for data analysis. We discuss each of these potential issues in turn and make recommendations for how to avoid them in future behavior research. More consistency in how neophobia studies are designed would facilitate comparisons across different populations and species and allow researchers to better understand whether neophobia can help explain animals' responses to human-altered landscapes and the ability to survive in the Anthropocene.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative and Comparative Biology ( ICB ), formerly American Zoologist , is one of the most highly respected and cited journals in the field of biology. The journal''s primary focus is to integrate the varying disciplines in this broad field, while maintaining the highest scientific quality. ICB''s peer-reviewed symposia provide first class syntheses of the top research in a field. ICB also publishes book reviews, reports, and special bulletins.
期刊最新文献
Big fish can't jump? Allometry of terrestrial jumping in cyprinodontiform fishes. Combining Morphological Characteristics and DNA Barcoding Techniques Confirm Sea Urchins of the Genus Echinometra (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in Marine Habitat Located at Extreme Regions of the Caribbean Sea. Marine Debris Harbor Unique, yet Functionally Similar Cryptofauna Communities. The Young and the Resilient: Investigating Coral Thermal Resilience in Early Life Stages. Hurricane Irma Linked to Coral Skeletal Density Shifts on the Florida Keys Reef Tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1