急诊科精神疾病患者化学和物理约束的种族差异调查

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1007/s40615-023-01863-4
Sean Boley, Abbey Sidebottom, Marc Vacquier, David Watson
{"title":"急诊科精神疾病患者化学和物理约束的种族差异调查","authors":"Sean Boley, Abbey Sidebottom, Marc Vacquier, David Watson","doi":"10.1007/s40615-023-01863-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary aim of this study is to examine whether racial disparities exist in the use of physical or chemical restraints in the emergency department (ED). The secondary aim is to explore if there are disparities in type or intensity of restraint. We examined ED encounters for acute mental health crises from a single health system over a 3-year period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine associations of race/ethnicity with primary outcomes of physical and/or chemical restraint and a measure of restraint intensity among patients physically restrained. The study sample included 18,938 ED encounters with completed psychiatric consultations representing 13,316 unique patients. Restraint use was experienced by one-third of the sample (32.6%): 27.9% chemical restraint, 0.8% physical restraint, 3.9% both physical and chemical. In adjusted logistic regression models, odds of chemical restraint were lower for non-Hispanic (NH) Black (OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.93), NH Asian (OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.83), and Hispanic (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.95) patients relative to NH White, with no difference for NH American Indian and multiracial. In the models assessing physical restraint use, there were no statistically significant differences by race/ethnicity. Among patients who were physically restrained, there were no differences in the adjusted models of high versus low intensity of the restraint type used. Among ED patients at high risk for restraint, patients of minority race/ethnicity were not found to have increased likelihood of restraint or intensity of restraint.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":"191-200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Racial Disparities in Chemical and Physical Restraint of Mental Health Patients in the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Sean Boley, Abbey Sidebottom, Marc Vacquier, David Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-023-01863-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The primary aim of this study is to examine whether racial disparities exist in the use of physical or chemical restraints in the emergency department (ED). The secondary aim is to explore if there are disparities in type or intensity of restraint. We examined ED encounters for acute mental health crises from a single health system over a 3-year period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine associations of race/ethnicity with primary outcomes of physical and/or chemical restraint and a measure of restraint intensity among patients physically restrained. The study sample included 18,938 ED encounters with completed psychiatric consultations representing 13,316 unique patients. Restraint use was experienced by one-third of the sample (32.6%): 27.9% chemical restraint, 0.8% physical restraint, 3.9% both physical and chemical. In adjusted logistic regression models, odds of chemical restraint were lower for non-Hispanic (NH) Black (OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.93), NH Asian (OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.83), and Hispanic (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.95) patients relative to NH White, with no difference for NH American Indian and multiracial. In the models assessing physical restraint use, there were no statistically significant differences by race/ethnicity. Among patients who were physically restrained, there were no differences in the adjusted models of high versus low intensity of the restraint type used. Among ED patients at high risk for restraint, patients of minority race/ethnicity were not found to have increased likelihood of restraint or intensity of restraint.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"191-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01863-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01863-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是检查是否存在种族差异在使用物理或化学约束在急诊科(ED)。第二个目的是探索是否存在约束类型或强度上的差异。我们在3年的时间里检查了来自单一卫生系统的急性心理健康危机的ED遭遇。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型来检查种族/民族与物理和/或化学约束的主要结果的关联,以及对物理约束患者的约束强度的测量。研究样本包括18,938例ED就诊,完成精神病学咨询,代表13,316例独特患者。三分之一的样本(32.6%)使用过约束:27.9%的人使用过化学约束,0.8%的人使用过物理约束,3.9%的人使用过物理约束和化学约束。在调整后的logistic回归模型中,与NH白人相比,非西班牙裔(NH)黑人(OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.93)、NH亚洲人(OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.83)和西班牙裔(OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.95)患者发生化学约束的几率较低,而NH美洲印第安人和多种族患者发生化学约束的几率无差异。在评估身体约束使用的模型中,种族/民族之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在身体约束的患者中,使用的约束类型的高强度与低强度的调整模型没有差异。在约束的高风险ED患者中,没有发现少数种族/民族的患者约束的可能性或约束的强度增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating Racial Disparities in Chemical and Physical Restraint of Mental Health Patients in the Emergency Department.

The primary aim of this study is to examine whether racial disparities exist in the use of physical or chemical restraints in the emergency department (ED). The secondary aim is to explore if there are disparities in type or intensity of restraint. We examined ED encounters for acute mental health crises from a single health system over a 3-year period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine associations of race/ethnicity with primary outcomes of physical and/or chemical restraint and a measure of restraint intensity among patients physically restrained. The study sample included 18,938 ED encounters with completed psychiatric consultations representing 13,316 unique patients. Restraint use was experienced by one-third of the sample (32.6%): 27.9% chemical restraint, 0.8% physical restraint, 3.9% both physical and chemical. In adjusted logistic regression models, odds of chemical restraint were lower for non-Hispanic (NH) Black (OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.93), NH Asian (OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.83), and Hispanic (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.95) patients relative to NH White, with no difference for NH American Indian and multiracial. In the models assessing physical restraint use, there were no statistically significant differences by race/ethnicity. Among patients who were physically restrained, there were no differences in the adjusted models of high versus low intensity of the restraint type used. Among ED patients at high risk for restraint, patients of minority race/ethnicity were not found to have increased likelihood of restraint or intensity of restraint.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
Understanding Coping Strategies and Sociocultural Context in Black Americans' Mental Health. The Intersectionality Between Bi and Multiracial College Students' Self-identification and Their Behaviors-A Pilot Study. Impact of Racial Bias on Providers' Empathic Communication Behaviors with Women of Color in Postpartum Checkup. Correction: Implicit Racial Bias in Evaluation of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome. Factors Associated with Self-reported COVID-19 Infection and Hospitalization among Patients Seeking Care at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1