鼠体体重和外耳放大与噪声致听阈位移的相关性初步分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1007/s10162-023-00913-2
Sarah K Grinn, Monica Trevino, Edward Lobarinas
{"title":"鼠体体重和外耳放大与噪声致听阈位移的相关性初步分析。","authors":"Sarah K Grinn, Monica Trevino, Edward Lobarinas","doi":"10.1007/s10162-023-00913-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External-ear amplification (EEA) has been shown to vary from 5-19 dB-A in large datasets of pediatric, adolescent, and adult human participants. However, variable EEA is an overlooked characteristic that likely plays a role in individual noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) susceptibility. A noise exposure varying 5-19 dB-A translates to high-EEA individuals theoretically experiencing 3-4 times greater NIHL risk than low-EEA individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this preliminary analysis was to test the hypothesis that higher EEA is correlated with increased noise-induced threshold shift susceptibility.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nine chinchillas were exposed to 4-kHz octave-band noise at 89 dB-SPL for 24 h. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were obtained pre-exposure, 24-h post-exposure, and 4-week post-exposure. Relationships between EEA and threshold shift were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Open-ear EEA ranged 11-19 dB-SPL, and occluded-ear EEA ranged 10-21 dB-SPL. Higher occluded-ear EEA was correlated with increased NIHL susceptibility (p = 0.04), as was lower body weight (p = 0.01). Male animals exhibited more threshold shift than female animals (p = 0.02), lower body weight than female animals (p = 0.02), and higher occluded-ear EEA (male mean = 18 dB; female mean = 15 dB).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taken together, increased threshold shift susceptibility was observed in the smallest animals, animals with the highest occluded-ear EEA, and in male animals (which tended to have higher occluded-ear EEA). Given the established relationship between smaller body size and higher occluded-ear EEA, these preliminary results suggest that body size (and occluded-ear EEA; a function of body size) could be a potential, underlying driver of NIHL susceptibility differences, rather than true sex differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"563-574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10752858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noise-Induced Hearing Threshold Shift Correlated with Body Weight and External-Ear Amplification in Chinchilla: a Preliminary Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah K Grinn, Monica Trevino, Edward Lobarinas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10162-023-00913-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External-ear amplification (EEA) has been shown to vary from 5-19 dB-A in large datasets of pediatric, adolescent, and adult human participants. However, variable EEA is an overlooked characteristic that likely plays a role in individual noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) susceptibility. A noise exposure varying 5-19 dB-A translates to high-EEA individuals theoretically experiencing 3-4 times greater NIHL risk than low-EEA individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this preliminary analysis was to test the hypothesis that higher EEA is correlated with increased noise-induced threshold shift susceptibility.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nine chinchillas were exposed to 4-kHz octave-band noise at 89 dB-SPL for 24 h. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were obtained pre-exposure, 24-h post-exposure, and 4-week post-exposure. Relationships between EEA and threshold shift were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Open-ear EEA ranged 11-19 dB-SPL, and occluded-ear EEA ranged 10-21 dB-SPL. Higher occluded-ear EEA was correlated with increased NIHL susceptibility (p = 0.04), as was lower body weight (p = 0.01). Male animals exhibited more threshold shift than female animals (p = 0.02), lower body weight than female animals (p = 0.02), and higher occluded-ear EEA (male mean = 18 dB; female mean = 15 dB).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taken together, increased threshold shift susceptibility was observed in the smallest animals, animals with the highest occluded-ear EEA, and in male animals (which tended to have higher occluded-ear EEA). Given the established relationship between smaller body size and higher occluded-ear EEA, these preliminary results suggest that body size (and occluded-ear EEA; a function of body size) could be a potential, underlying driver of NIHL susceptibility differences, rather than true sex differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"563-574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10752858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-023-00913-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-023-00913-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在儿童、青少年和成人参与者的大型数据集中,外耳放大(EEA)已被证明在5-19 dB-A之间变化。然而,可变EEA是一个被忽视的特征,可能在个体噪声性听力损失(NIHL)易感性中起作用。噪声暴露在5- 19db -A之间,理论上高eea个体的NIHL风险是低eea个体的3-4倍。目的:本初步分析的目的是检验较高的EEA与噪声诱发的阈值移位敏感性增加相关的假设。设计:9只龙猫以89 dB-SPL的4 khz倍频噪声暴露24小时。分别测定暴露前、暴露后24小时和暴露后4周的听觉脑干反应阈值。分析了EEA与阈值位移之间的关系。结果:开耳EEA范围为11 ~ 19 dB-SPL,闭耳EEA范围为10 ~ 21 dB-SPL。封闭耳EEA越高,NIHL易感性越高(p = 0.04),体重越低(p = 0.01)。雄性动物比雌性动物表现出更大的阈值位移(p = 0.02),体重比雌性动物低(p = 0.02),封闭耳EEA更高(雄性平均= 18 dB;女性平均值= 15 dB)。结论:综上所述,最小的动物、封闭耳EEA最高的动物和雄性动物(往往具有更高的封闭耳EEA)的阈值位移敏感性增加。考虑到较小的体型与较高的封闭耳EEA之间的关系,这些初步结果表明体型(和封闭耳EEA);(身体大小的函数)可能是NIHL易感性差异的潜在驱动因素,而不是真正的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Noise-Induced Hearing Threshold Shift Correlated with Body Weight and External-Ear Amplification in Chinchilla: a Preliminary Analysis.

Background: External-ear amplification (EEA) has been shown to vary from 5-19 dB-A in large datasets of pediatric, adolescent, and adult human participants. However, variable EEA is an overlooked characteristic that likely plays a role in individual noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) susceptibility. A noise exposure varying 5-19 dB-A translates to high-EEA individuals theoretically experiencing 3-4 times greater NIHL risk than low-EEA individuals.

Objective: The purpose of this preliminary analysis was to test the hypothesis that higher EEA is correlated with increased noise-induced threshold shift susceptibility.

Design: Nine chinchillas were exposed to 4-kHz octave-band noise at 89 dB-SPL for 24 h. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were obtained pre-exposure, 24-h post-exposure, and 4-week post-exposure. Relationships between EEA and threshold shift were analyzed.

Results: Open-ear EEA ranged 11-19 dB-SPL, and occluded-ear EEA ranged 10-21 dB-SPL. Higher occluded-ear EEA was correlated with increased NIHL susceptibility (p = 0.04), as was lower body weight (p = 0.01). Male animals exhibited more threshold shift than female animals (p = 0.02), lower body weight than female animals (p = 0.02), and higher occluded-ear EEA (male mean = 18 dB; female mean = 15 dB).

Conclusions: Taken together, increased threshold shift susceptibility was observed in the smallest animals, animals with the highest occluded-ear EEA, and in male animals (which tended to have higher occluded-ear EEA). Given the established relationship between smaller body size and higher occluded-ear EEA, these preliminary results suggest that body size (and occluded-ear EEA; a function of body size) could be a potential, underlying driver of NIHL susceptibility differences, rather than true sex differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance. Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Correlation Between Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Group Delays and Tuning Sharpness in a Cochlear Model. Tuning and Timing of Organ of Corti Vibrations at the Apex of the Intact Chinchilla Cochlea. Vital Dye Uptake of YO-PRO-1 and DASPEI Depends Upon Mechanoelectrical Transduction Function in Zebrafish Hair Cells. Investigating the Effect of Blurring and Focusing Current in Cochlear Implant Users with the Panoramic ECAP Method. Eric Daniel Young.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1