接触心理健康危机热线的人的危机和临床途径的社会经济预测因素。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2023-11-16 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329231212120
Molly McCarthy, Jason C McIntyre, Rajan Nathan, Emma L Ashworth, Pooja Saini
{"title":"接触心理健康危机热线的人的危机和临床途径的社会经济预测因素。","authors":"Molly McCarthy, Jason C McIntyre, Rajan Nathan, Emma L Ashworth, Pooja Saini","doi":"10.1177/11786329231212120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Crisis lines are the first mental health service contact point for many people, making them a vital community and public health intervention. Given the current and potential utility of crisis lines, better understanding the characteristics, socioeconomic factors and subsequent referral pathways of callers is critical to identifying targeted ways to improve such services.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The dataset captured calls to the Cheshire & Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (CWP) crisis line between August 2020 and August 2021. Calls were examined if self-harm, risk to self, or overdose were reported by the caller. Descriptive analyses were conducted to produce a clinical and demographic profile of the callers using the crisis line.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Call handlers were significantly more likely to call 999, hand over to a practitioner and less likely to provide advice and guidance if self-harm, risk to self or overdose was reported. Social issues were found to be significantly associated with all 3 outcomes: self-harm, risk to self and overdose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study provides the first exploratory analysis of the socioeconomic factors and resultant care pathways for those contacting a UK crisis line service. The findings have important implications for community early intervention efforts to reduce self-harm and suicidal behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"16 ","pages":"11786329231212120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic Predictors of Crisis and Clinical Pathways Among People Contacting a Mental Health Crisis Line.\",\"authors\":\"Molly McCarthy, Jason C McIntyre, Rajan Nathan, Emma L Ashworth, Pooja Saini\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11786329231212120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Crisis lines are the first mental health service contact point for many people, making them a vital community and public health intervention. Given the current and potential utility of crisis lines, better understanding the characteristics, socioeconomic factors and subsequent referral pathways of callers is critical to identifying targeted ways to improve such services.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The dataset captured calls to the Cheshire & Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (CWP) crisis line between August 2020 and August 2021. Calls were examined if self-harm, risk to self, or overdose were reported by the caller. Descriptive analyses were conducted to produce a clinical and demographic profile of the callers using the crisis line.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Call handlers were significantly more likely to call 999, hand over to a practitioner and less likely to provide advice and guidance if self-harm, risk to self or overdose was reported. Social issues were found to be significantly associated with all 3 outcomes: self-harm, risk to self and overdose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study provides the first exploratory analysis of the socioeconomic factors and resultant care pathways for those contacting a UK crisis line service. The findings have important implications for community early intervention efforts to reduce self-harm and suicidal behaviours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Insights\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"11786329231212120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655650/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329231212120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329231212120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:危机热线是许多人的第一个精神卫生服务接触点,使其成为重要的社区和公共卫生干预措施。鉴于危机热线目前和潜在的效用,更好地了解呼叫者的特点、社会经济因素和随后的转诊途径对于确定有针对性的改善此类服务的方法至关重要。研究设计:该数据集捕获了2020年8月至2021年8月期间柴郡和威勒尔伙伴关系NHS基金会信托基金(CWP)危机线的电话。调查人员会检查来电者是否报告有自残、自我风险或服药过量。进行描述性分析,以产生使用危机线呼叫者的临床和人口统计资料。结果:呼叫处理人员更有可能拨打999,移交给医生,而不太可能提供建议和指导,如果自残,自我风险或过量报告。社会问题被发现与所有三种结果显著相关:自残、自我风险和过量用药。结论:目前的研究提供了第一个探索性分析的社会经济因素和由此产生的护理途径,为那些联系英国危机热线服务。这一发现对社区早期干预努力减少自残和自杀行为具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Socioeconomic Predictors of Crisis and Clinical Pathways Among People Contacting a Mental Health Crisis Line.

Objective: Crisis lines are the first mental health service contact point for many people, making them a vital community and public health intervention. Given the current and potential utility of crisis lines, better understanding the characteristics, socioeconomic factors and subsequent referral pathways of callers is critical to identifying targeted ways to improve such services.

Study design: The dataset captured calls to the Cheshire & Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (CWP) crisis line between August 2020 and August 2021. Calls were examined if self-harm, risk to self, or overdose were reported by the caller. Descriptive analyses were conducted to produce a clinical and demographic profile of the callers using the crisis line.

Results: Call handlers were significantly more likely to call 999, hand over to a practitioner and less likely to provide advice and guidance if self-harm, risk to self or overdose was reported. Social issues were found to be significantly associated with all 3 outcomes: self-harm, risk to self and overdose.

Conclusion: The current study provides the first exploratory analysis of the socioeconomic factors and resultant care pathways for those contacting a UK crisis line service. The findings have important implications for community early intervention efforts to reduce self-harm and suicidal behaviours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementing a Decommissioning Programme in Swedish Healthcare: Experiences of Healthcare Managers. Are There Shortages and Regional Disparities in Lecanemab Treatment Facilities? A Cross-Sectional Study. Nigerian Hospital and Community Pharmacists' Knowledge, Awareness, and Perceptions of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Stationary Scholars: The Looming Health Crisis Among Preclinical and Paraclinical Doctors in India. Effects of the Mental Health Law on Peruvian Primary Care Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study on Knowledge of Major Depressive Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1